"I like Durbin's bill, but I see no chance of its passage as long as Republicans control the House. However, I consider it worth pursuing, because it makes public the manner in which Republicans are sabotaging Americans' safety for the sake of gun industry profits and seditionist hate groups."
"Seditionist hate groups." Where have I heard that before? My response, which is "awaiting moderation."
"Free the ATF?" Interesting experiment in alternate collectivist reality. You perhaps have heard of the Law of Unintended Consequences? Starting a bloody civil war seems a bit counterproductive to your plans and to the safety of the society you wish to foist them upon. I understand that collectivism is nothing but an appetite for other people's liberty, property and lives but just how many of us "bitter clingers" are you willing to see dead in order to enforce your plans for more citizen disarmament? A million? Two? Ten? Think hard, and think now — before that process server from the Law of Unintended Consequences shows up at your door with the butcher's bill.
"just how many of us "bitter clingers" are you willing to see dead in order to enforce your plans for more citizen disarmament?"
His answer, of course, will be "all of you". A question that might give him some pause is, "Just how many of us 'bitter clingers' are you willing to come after you?"
The mindset of the enemy is absolute. They want ALL "counterrevolutionaries" & "bourgeois" dead.
They killed 262 million in their attempt at utopia. The rematch will not be in their favor.
Post a Comment