Tuesday, October 26, 2010

They went to vote for Sharron Angle and Harry Reid's name was already checked.

Fluke or election stealing?

And here's another "isolated incident" from NC.


Anonymous said...

Even better reason to "withdraw" from this fraud called an election process!

ParaPacem said...

Is it not beyond the powers of cosmic coincidence, that in such vastly different locations, the only problems with the fraudulent machines, consistently fail in favor of the dhimmicrats?
No Repube-ican favoring "errors".
Ain't it just too too weird?

MadDawg308 said...

There will be NO MORE stolen elections.

Anonymous said...

"There will be NO MORE stolen elections."

Unfortunately for all involved, there most certainly will be. Count on it.

Anonymous said...

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."

Dedicated_Dad said...

Most electronic machines still have no paper backup, hence no recount is possible.

Take it from a computer systems guru: there are infinite ways to turn these machines to the will of the person capable of hacking them.

"voting machines" are - at their core - essentially a PC with a touch screen. Like all computers, they're only as reliable as their programming.

The "buttons" on screen are defined by the programmer - not just the number, position or appearance, but the label as well.

When you touch an on-screen "button", the program then takes a defined action based on the program - in this case it would be to record a vote for the person for whom you intended to vote.

The thing is, it would be trivial for any programmer to tell the system to record your vote for "A" when you push "B."

Worse, in especially close races, it could easily turn every-other vote for "A" to "B" - the "favored" candidate. Likewise every 9th, 11th or whatever -- just a matter of simple programming.

Without a paper backup, the entire thing is a black hole, impossible to REALLY secure against such abuse.

The solution couldn't be simpler, and the cost - relatively - trivial.

All it would take is a simple multi-part receipt printer.

The top copy (usually white) is torn off and handed to the voter so he can check his votes were recorded as he intended.

The second copy (usually yellow or pink) is contained in a roll inside the printer. They even come with a lock.

The voter copy lets him verify his vote, the rolled-up copy provides a clear record so a validation-exercise or recount could be performed.

Best of all, receipt printers can be bought online for under $100 -- and that's RETAIL price for ONE.

Imagine how low wholesale price would me on an order for a few hundred thousand!

So, you must ask yourself a simple question:

Why is it that - after all the ongoing controversy over these machines - this still has not been done?

Simple: SOMEONE prefers the current and ongoing ease of corruption.

Anonymous said...

Someone on here once stated that Once is an accident. Twice could be coincidence. Three times is enemy action.

Anonymous said...

Don't think for a minute they're going to go quietly in to the night.
They have been doing it for years, both sides, and they can't stop themselves. They also think we're stupid enough to take it one more time, and they're largely right, at least regarding voters on the whole.
Prepare yourself for shameless open theft. And more Black-Panther style "security" at urban polling places.

Scott J said...

Read a great idea on another blog: cellphone cameras.

Let's get some proof of this stuff out there.

Bad Cyborg said...

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict that in every race where Repubs are currently lest than 10 percentage points ahead on the last poll before the election the Dumbocrat will win. I expect the Dumbs not only NOT to have a net loss in seats but to actually GAIN seats in both houses. After this election the GOP will no longer be relevant. They will be the permanent Washington Senators.

Of the masses; by the unelected; for the elites.

Anonymous said...

The voting machine techs are seiu;

Anonymous said...

It only takes a few votes to win an election when you employ fraud and that is what has been done in the past. Take a look at Washington state in the last election for governor.

Anonymous said...

When your vote no longer counts, it's time.

Anonymous said...

Another admission;

Anonymous said...

do you think the obamanoids and D's across the states are going to go quietly? The bigger question is what will we do about it? Because no one else will? Better get yourself ready, as talk is cheap. Even if the D's loose, they have set the money crash and everything else in motion that will spin the US far from what we used to know.

TPaine said...

The coup de grace here is that SEIU is in charge of the voting process in NV. Does that trigger any alarm bells? The big question is, how in the hell are they involved, and no one is raising a major stink about it? If I was Sharron Angle, I'd be in front of a major court somewhere, protesting the entire vote count BEFORE November 2nd rolls around.

They're not only rigging the vote, they're doing it openly and daring anyone to stop them.

Definitely time to lock and load!