Newsbusters debunks Rachel's Big Lie.
Ethics-averse Rachel Maddow did exactly that on her MSNBC show last night. After disparaging Republican candidates for their gall in criticizing reckless federal spending and government-controlled health care, Maddow made this jaw-dropper of a claim --
MADDOW: Yes, this has happened to a smaller degree before. In 1994, in the first mid-term election after the last Democratic president was elected, we got a slate of candidates that included Helen Chenoweth of Idaho and Steve Stockman of Texas. These two were so close to the militia movement in this country that Mr. Stockman actually received advance notice that the Oklahoma City bombing was going to happen.
... and by that, Maddow implies, Stockman consigned 168 innocent people to death. Except that Stockman received no such prior, uh, "notice" (note how Maddow did not say "warning") , which explains why Maddow neglected to attribute this outlandish assertion to a source, any source.
There is no source, of course. Newsbusters easily debunked the claim. Truth be told, despite the "Narrative of 1995" and Madcow's most delirious imaginings, the militias had nothing to do with the Oklahoma City Bombing. That fault lies with an FBI sting on the Aryan Republican Army gone bad.
Now, if Rachel wants to name people who ACTUALLY had warning of the OKC bombing she could name Andreas Carl Strassmeier, the FBI snitch inside the Aryan Republican Army support base at Elohim City, Oklahoma, or the FBI agents who were out the night before with direction finding hoops on OKC's overpasses looking for a misplaced rental van, or the ATF agents who were told "not to come into work that day," or maybe Morris Dees of the Southern Preposterous Lie Center, who also had a snitch inside Elohim City.
"Shut the hell up, Rachel! Why did you have to bring up Oklahoma City?"
But, no, I doubt that Madcow is interested in the truth behind the mass murder of 176 Americans. The truth just will not do. So she prefers the Big Lie.
I have read your tidbits regarding some watershed moments in recent American History and find them fascinating and in agreement with the truth as far as i can tell. Can you direct me to some of your articles (dates)that go into greater depth on :
Waco,9/11,khobhar towers bombing,the assassinations of various enemies of the clintons (Ron Brown,Vince Foster) also do you have any info on Osama bin Laden as a CIA asset and if he is still alive? In addition i feel the PTB are planning another holodomor. Do you agree have a game plan you wish to share?
I find lies told by douche-bag lesbian communists emminently amusing. If anyone sees her before I do, would you tell her I need another cup of coffee?
When I worked in the news biz, I saw a photo on the Associated Press wire of Timothy McVeigh as part of Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf's elite personal security detail. Was that ever mentioned again during his trial and swift execution, by anyone? I mean, what kind of security clearance would he have had to have had? I know Maddow interviewed him prior to his execution, because my somewhat liberal stepson recommended I watch it. I couldn't watch her for 30 seconds, based on what I've read.
Was McVeigh ein gut soldat, a good soldier who would follow ANY order, even to mounting a false flag demolition job that would demonize the militia for the foreseeable future? Would an elite soldier "get lost" and be late on that morning but carry through on the mission anyway, killing children?
If the *Hell's Angels* in New York City can get pounds of C-4, why ammonium nitrate and fuel oil in OKC?
In a way, it's good that Madcow has brought this back to the public consciousness.
This situation is kind of like a retailer who advertises in the widely-circulated Sunday paper every week with an intentional "misprint" to draw customers. They print a tiny correction in the back pages of the Wednesday newspaper to make things right, but who notices that? The public at large believes that store has the best deals in town, but the few who attempt to acquire those bargains only get an apology instead. Eventually, the truth becomes known to all and the reputation of the retailer suffers. The same outcome awaits Rachel Madcow.
If it comes out of MSM, it is completely unreliable with the exception of Fox news. Fox is not immune from pressures, has changed it's format while attempting not to piss off it's market base and may slump further to the left in years to come.
Real truth and facts are found there still but ever increasingly the net is the primary source of factual information. Which is why they want to control it and will do so by any means they can arrange, terrorism being the most ready available excuse.
Anon @ 8:17am
FOX news is the enemy within. We KNOW the rest of the alphabet news agencies are leftist scum, but it seems we think FOX is one of us. Hardly! In the last presidential election Frank Luntz, Fox employee and author of "Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear" was responsible for choosing a focus group of random citizens to comment on the Republican primary debates. After the election was over it was discovered that Frank had chosen one random man (Chuck) multiple times for discussion about the debates. Google "frank luntz exposed" -- and here is the youtube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrpES1Lk7X4
It turns out that man was negative on any anti-establishment candidate, and PRO McCain. FOX news help guaranteed a McCain primary victory, thus destroying Republican chances of taking the Whitehouse. Yes, FOX is responsible for giving us Obama. And don't get me started on Murdock. Anyway... This is just one example of the dirty tricks they use to protect the establishment. Watch this video with Frank Luntz and other manipulative douche-bags discussing -- "Deceiving Images: The Science of Manipulation" http://www.linktv.org/programs/orwell_deceiving
Its long and boring but you'll understand why FOX news hires men (tools) like Frank Luntz. They need him to help with the dirty work.
Post a Comment