Friday, April 17, 2015

Inside the secret political police. "The FBI Informant Who Mounted a Sting Operation Against the FBI."

Torres isn’t an all-American guy. He’s an FBI informant, one of more than 15,000 domestic spies who make up the largest surveillance network ever created in the United States. During J. Edgar Hoover’s COINTELPRO operations, the bureau had just 1,500 informants. The drug war brought that number up to about 6,000. After 9/11, the bureau recruited so many new informants — many of them crooks and convicts, desperate for money or leniency on previous crimes — that the government had to develop software to help agents track their spies.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Grassley: DOJ gun ban unfair to veterans

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/16/senator-investigates-why-so-many-veterans-are-being-placed-on-fbi-mental-defective-gun-ban-list/

Anonymous said...

SECOND AMENDMENT: Ted Cruz Throws Down

When you asked about the role of public opinion polls, when it comes to Constitutional rights, what matters is what the Bill of Rights says. It doesn’t matter what happens to be popular at the moment.

The entire reason for the Second Amendment is not for hunting, it’s not for target shooting … it’s there so that you and I can protect our homes and our families and our lives. And it’s also there as fundamental check on government tyranny.”

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2015/04/second-amendment-ted-cruz-throws-down.html

Anonymous said...

Don't worry. The media will find some way to destroy Cruz before the primaries.

They always do this because they are fair minded, unbiased and independent, Marxists, just looking out for the country don't 'cha know.

Anonymous said...

VIDEO: Students support Hillary -- just because she is woman...


http://campusreform.org/?ID=6452

Anonymous said...

The FBI cannot find up actual terrorist muzzies so it has to make them up in order to justify budgets. It's the same as cops with bogus traffic stops to "find drugs".... It's all about the money, man!

To the Cruz comment posted -
The rights enumerated ARE subject to the democratic vote - but ONLY under the tallest of combinations. After all, it was the democratic process, both direct and representative and both state and federal that brought the bill of rights to become part of the constitution in the first place. It's called the amendment process.

The ONLY way the gun control the zealots want can LAWFULLY be put in place BY the democratic process those tyrants seek to abuse is by constitutional amendment. That's the fight we should be waging right there. We should be telling the zealots regularly that if they want to employ "democracy" to enumerated inalienable rights that they are bound to relent before the terms of their own desires. That is to say hoist them by their own petard.

It's protections, the bill of rights, became law. So really it's the law of rights - it's no longer a bill. It's not debatable as if it isn't yet passed. We ought to start ACTING from that position instead of accepting the premise that it's all still in the debate stage.

Capitalist Eric said...

Thought you might get a laugh out of this....
http://nytimes.com.co/california-implements-statewide-ban-on-all-45-acp-ammunition/

Leave it to the government to open all KINDS of new business opportunities! ;)

Capitalist Eric said...

Sorry, the website I just linked was *satire.* Apologies.