Saturday, November 26, 2011

The Rules of Journalism that T. Brown missed. Spanish Inquisition begins at Newsweak. Tina Brown decides she really, really doesn't like me. Really.

Ximinez: NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four* *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... I'll come in again. -- Monty Python, The Spanish Inquisition.

Principles of Journalism

After extended examination by journalists themselves of the character of journalism at the end of the twentieth century, we offer this common understanding of what defines our work. The central purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with accurate and reliable information they need to function in a free society.

This encompasses myriad roles--helping define community, creating common language and common knowledge, identifying a community's goals, heros and villains, and pushing people beyond complacency. This purpose also involves other requirements, such as being entertaining, serving as watchdog and offering voice to the voiceless.

Over time journalists have developed nine core principles to meet the task. They comprise what might be described as the theory of journalism:

1. Journalism's first obligation is to the truth

Democracy depends on citizens having reliable, accurate facts put in a meaningful context. Journalism does not pursue truth in an absolute or philosophical sense, but it can--and must--pursue it in a practical sense. This "journalistic truth" is a process that begins with the professional discipline of assembling and verifying facts. Then journalists try to convey a fair and reliable account of their meaning, valid for now, subject to further investigation. Journalists should be as transparent as possible about sources and methods so audiences can make their own assessment of the information. Even in a world of expanding voices, accuracy is the foundation upon which everything else is built--context, interpretation, comment, criticism, analysis and debate. The truth, over time, emerges from this forum. As citizens encounter an ever greater flow of data, they have more need--not less--for identifiable sources dedicated to verifying that information and putting it in context.

2. Its first loyalty is to citizens

While news organizations answer to many constituencies, including advertisers and shareholders, the journalists in those organizations must maintain allegiance to citizens and the larger public interest above any other if they are to provide the news without fear or favor. This commitment to citizens first is the basis of a news organization's credibility, the implied covenant that tells the audience the coverage is not slanted for friends or advertisers. Commitment to citizens also means journalism should present a representative picture of all constituent groups in society. Ignoring certain citizens has the effect of disenfranchising them. The theory underlying the modern news industry has been the belief that credibility builds a broad and loyal audience, and that economic success follows in turn. In that regard, the business people in a news organization also must nurture--not exploit--their allegiance to the audience ahead of other considerations.

3. Its essence is a discipline of verification

Journalists rely on a professional discipline for verifying information. When the concept of objectivity originally evolved, it did not imply that journalists are free of bias. It called, rather, for a consistent method of testing information--a transparent approach to evidence--precisely so that personal and cultural biases would not undermine the accuracy of their work. The method is objective, not the journalist. Seeking out multiple witnesses, disclosing as much as possible about sources, or asking various sides for comment, all signal such standards. This discipline of verification is what separates journalism from other modes of communication, such as propaganda, fiction or entertainment. But the need for professional method is not always fully recognized or refined. While journalism has developed various techniques for determining facts, for instance, it has done less to develop a system for testing the reliability of journalistic interpretation.

4. Its practitioners must maintain an independence from those they cover

Independence is an underlying requirement of journalism, a cornerstone of its reliability. Independence of spirit and mind, rather than neutrality, is the principle journalists must keep in focus. While editorialists and commentators are not neutral, the source of their credibility is still their accuracy, intellectual fairness and ability to inform--not their devotion to a certain group or outcome. In our independence, however, we must avoid any tendency to stray into arrogance, elitism, isolation or nihilism.

5. It must serve as an independent monitor of power

Journalism has an unusual capacity to serve as watchdog over those whose power and position most affect citizens. The Founders recognized this to be a rampart against despotism when they ensured an independent press; courts have affirmed it; citizens rely on it. As journalists, we have an obligation to protect this watchdog freedom by not demeaning it in frivolous use or exploiting it for commercial gain.

6. It must provide a forum for public criticism and compromise

The news media are the common carriers of public discussion, and this responsibility forms a basis for our special privileges. This discussion serves society best when it is informed by facts rather than prejudice and supposition. It also should strive to fairly represent the varied viewpoints and interests in society, and to place them in context rather than highlight only the conflicting fringes of debate. Accuracy and truthfulness require that as framers of the public discussion we not neglect the points of common ground where problem solving occurs.

7. It must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant

Journalism is storytelling with a purpose. It should do more than gather an audience or catalogue the important. For its own survival, it must balance what readers know they want with what they cannot anticipate but need. In short, it must strive to make the significant interesting and relevant. The effectiveness of a piece of journalism is measured both by how much a work engages its audience and enlightens it. This means journalists must continually ask what information has most value to citizens and in what form. While journalism should reach beyond such topics as government and public safety, a journalism overwhelmed by trivia and false significance ultimately engenders a trivial society.

8. It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional

Keeping news in proportion and not leaving important things out are also cornerstones of truthfulness. Journalism is a form of cartography: it creates a map for citizens to navigate society. Inflating events for sensation, neglecting others, stereotyping or being disproportionately negative all make a less reliable map. The map also should include news of all our communities, not just those with attractive demographics. This is best achieved by newsrooms with a diversity of backgrounds and perspectives. The map is only an analogy; proportion and comprehensiveness are subjective, yet their elusiveness does not lessen their significance.

9. Its practitioners must be allowed to exercise their personal conscience

Every journalist must have a personal sense of ethics and responsibility--a moral compass. Each of us must be willing, if fairness and accuracy require, to voice differences with our colleagues, whether in the newsroom or the executive suite. News organizations do well to nurture this independence by encouraging individuals to speak their minds. This stimulates the intellectual diversity necessary to understand and accurately cover an increasingly diverse society. It is this diversity of minds and voices, not just numbers, that matters. --

Tina Brown must have skipped class the day that they covered those rules.

According to reports from our C.O.W.L. deep-cover agent Alvin Wombat, the Spanish Inquisition began at Newsweak within two hours of the posting Friday of "Hiding mass murder behind 'national security. What Newsweak & the FBI didn't want you to know about PATCON and the OKC Bombing."

Tina Brown is said to very angry and is determined to find out who leaked the details of the story she didn't want to surface. Wombat reports that the screaming was largely focused on the fact that Tina has decided that she really, really doesn't like me. Really.

Various editors, reporters and sources are under suspicion.

(No attention has as yet focused on the aforementioned Wombat, who learned his intelligence techniques following around his brother-in-law, the celebrated anti-ATF spy Ramsey A. Bear.)

"Who the hell is Mike Vanderboegh and how did he find out about me gutting the f--king PATCON story?!? More importantly, WHO gave him the original story?!?!?"

Seriously, though, Brown is beside herself. So too, say other sources, is the FBI, DOJ and White House. They are all quite at sea about how to deal with this, and with me. Some fear that anything they do, including disciplining the editors and journalists, will blow back on them, drawing more attention to the story. On the other hand, the smart ones understand that this will not go away and all they need is for Brent Bozell to bring it to the attention of Rush Limbaugh and it will begin to get far, far worse.

It's a conundrum, fer sure. And it couldn't happen to nicer, more deserving folks.

For now, the Rules of Journalism have been taken down off the walls at Newsweek and the following poster put up in its stead, to remind Newsweek employees who's boss.


Anonymous said...

Might be a good time to remind folks of the "100 heads" meme.

I'm quite sure that our old friend "0317" is FAR from alone in his vow.

Y'all better think long and hard about touching even a single hair on this loud mouthed old fat-man's head.


Anonymous said...

LMAF - love it when the truth smacks them.

"0317" is not alone, never was.


Chunkdog said...

Wow, rules 3 & 4 are pretty much non-existent with today's journalists.

And I guess really pissing off Tina Brown and the Feds is like getting a early Christmas present.

"Tina Brown and the Feds"...sounds like a singing group from the 60's.

Longbow said...

The flak is heaviest over the target!

Got get some, Mike!


The world will be watching to make sure Mike stays healthy.

Anonymous said...

Mike, I think you have just hammered a big sharp stake up their backsides. Somehow I think they might be pissed off and are considering revenge but I do believe they fear what you will be coming out with next. Keep up the good work.

Mt Top Patriot said...

100 heads...yup.

Slobyskya Rotchikokov said...

RE the 100 heads "

I seem to recall that two total screwups in the Maryland /DC area - who never were true snipers - kept the best and brightest of the LEOs stepping and fetching all around the clock for weeks and unable to track them down, despite the taunts and such that the dimwit duo had left.

So should anything - God forbid - ever happen to Mike, I should imagine that a few hundred properly trained sniper types scattered around a dozen or so states could make life interesting for all kinds of the jackbooted thugs who serve the Beast.
From coast to coast, the hits would just keep on comin'. But this time, no taunts, no clues, no trace. At least, that's the word on the street.

Anonymous said...

Every. Where.

Believe it.

Anonymous said...

Tina Brown made #17 on GQ's list of "25 Least Influential People Alive" (coming out in December).

Here's an excerpt from The Blaze (

"But where GQ really pulls out all the stops, is in disparaging Tina Brown..."

"Brown spent 2011 transforming Newsweek from a magazine no one reads into a magazine no one reads but everyone despises..."

Dakota said...

Obviously a conundrum Mike, once again I am worried about you. Y'all be careful, ya hear.

Loved the "Bitches" poster .... always good to start the day with a good belly laugh.

Aiken Patriot said...

Your piece on Patcon says that our benevolent government has infiltrated every news organization. They need useful idiots like Tina Brown who think they are on the side of right. In turn, sad little newswriters like Tina Brown get to think they own the news and are the gate keepers. Sad, sad little Tina Brown.

Anonymous said...

Woodward and Bernstein got Nixon and Vanderboegh and Codrea will get Holder and Obama. There is not a damn thing that bitch Tina Brown can do about it. Rant on Bitch.

Anonymous said...

Dear Newsisweak,

Att: Tina Brown,

Do another story on how Lt. John F. Kerry's awards and citations are fact and not fraud.

Use his words, use his documents, that way you dig your on hole, we can work on real problmes. You and your worthless as hell mag. are not worth any effort.

If you need any real facts check with "Navy Cheif" of the swiftboat terror to liars blog.

Yours ever true,

rexxhead said...

Oderint dum metuant.

(Caligula's motto: Let them hate as long as they fear.)

Ashrak said...

Brent pointing GunWalker out to Rush is kinda what I had in mind when I pointed it out, straightforwardly, in a place Brent and those close to him were sure to see it, back in February.

I was torqued way back then after reading about GunWalker for a couple months and seeing it gain zero traction in the supposed "mainstream" media. I pointed to your guys' stuff there then so it could never be said that, even in that arena, "nobody knew" about it.

It is my hope that it was noticed right off the bat and that a lovely MRC study of how the supposed "mainstream" media has outright refused to 'Tell the Truth' about this scandal - which rises to the level of actively working to cover up the demonic nature of the scandal in order to continue to "help" the current "administration".

It is long past time for GunWalker to be blown wide open for all to see and, likewise, it is long past time that entrenched bureaucrats and elected corrupticrats are held to full account.

Might Brent, the MRC, Rush or some combination finally achieve such a detonation of bright shining light? That I cannot know, but I do know this much......Mike and David, along with those who trusted the sense of honor they thought and hoped existed within them both, will keep blowing it up by spreading lumens without fear but instead with boldness and courage found in too few souls these days.

Anonymous said...


I wonder when we're going to hear from Tina Brown's friend "Barkus"?

Anonymous said...

Time to settle in with some popcorn!

You absolutely rock, Mr. Vanderboegh.