Monday, August 31, 2015

David Codrea's first Ammoland column: IFOA Offers Concessions on Guns Following Roanoke Murders.

Latest from IFOA, one of the ghetto Judenraten of "gun rights groups."


Anonymous said...

Speaking of ghettos.....
It seems there is some racial animus happening with Oathkeepers down in Ferguson.
It seems the Oathkeepers got bit by that "can't win for loosing" bug or maybe it was the "no good deed goes unpunished" virus.

I actually liked the idea of a armed march in Missouri - I knew it was doomed to descend into abject failure the instant it was made about "blackness". Funny how that works, eh? Anytime something comes down to being decided by skin color it turns sour. Maybe that is a huge HINT that only be REMOVING skin color can a subject be addressed openly and honestly.....

Blackbird said...

As usual, great work by Mr. David Codrea!

Let's hammer these facts every time the leftist, disarmist, democratzis open their mouths about common sense gun control, blah, blah, blah.

“In 2004, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences released its evaluation from a review of 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some original empirical research. It failed to identify any gun control that had reduced violent crime, suicide, or gun accidents,” Kates and Mauser explain.

“The same conclusion was reached in 2003 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control’s review of then‐extant studies.”

Remember: In the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy, President Obama issued a list of Executive Orders. Notably among them, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) was given $10 million to research gun violence.

Here are some key findings from the CDC report, “Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence,” released in June [2013]:
1. Armed citizens are less likely to be injured by an attacker:
2. Defensive uses of guns are common:
3. Mass shootings and accidental firearm deaths account for a small fraction of gun-related deaths, and both are declining:
4. “Interventions” (i.e, gun control) such as background checks, so-called assault rifle bans and gun-free zones produce “mixed” results:
5. Gun buyback/turn-in programs are “ineffective” in reducing crime:
6. Stolen guns and retail/gun show purchases account for very little crime:
7. The vast majority of gun-related deaths are not homicides, but suicides:


Gun Control has been exposed for what it is - a False narrative. The Facts prove it time and again.

Galaxie_Man said...

"We have to do something!!"

There it is....the emotional cry that got us the "Safe Act" in NY and SB 1160 "AN ACT CONCERNING GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND CHILDREN'S SAFETY" in Kommiecticut. The response of Patriots, appropriately, is The Armed Civil Disobedience of Non-Compliance. Both intolerable acts are in a joint case before the 2nd Circuit Court, and we are STILL WAITING for their decision (the hearings were in December 2014, rulings usually 6 months later). Whatever decision is handed down, will be appealed to SCOTUS.

David certainly nailed it, though.....they will NEVER speak the words of what they really want, and what it would take to get actually there.

Anonymous said...

Good thoughts by Mr. C, but IMHO he sort of danced around the pivotal issue: exactly which of the 25,000 (nobody seems to know the exact number) currently existing local, state and federal 'gun control' laws are not 'reasonable' or 'common sense' enough for the hoplophobes? When they get cornered on that, their reply is ALWAYS well we just have to do 'something' - never mind of course that any and all of their 'solutions' (except of course total gun bans) most of which are in place already, have NOT stopped any of the crimes...........