The ORIGINAL gathering place for a merry band of Three Percenters. (As denounced by Bill Clinton on CNN!)
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Ferguson “Activists” Deliver Pre-Riot Demands To Police
Bob Owens calls this list "insane." It is not. It is perfectly understandable given the way that Eric Holder and his racist band have crafted the battlefield.
The "protesters" kind of put themselves in a corner for the inevitable exhoneration. They have to break other peoples stuff and generally act like a bunch of assholes after all of their social justice, righteous indignation, 400 years of slavery street theater bullshit antics.
And those people wonder why no one other than white guilt ridden hipsters and opportunistic politicians like them.
Number 11 reminds me of Lon Chaney in The Hunchback of Notre Dame at the door of the church yelling "Sanctuary".
Additionally they don't want their private information made public, but they can protest in front of officers homes? In my opinion if you're a protestor, you're a public figure.
If I recall one of the requirements for success in 4th generation warfare is a 'sanctuary' where the fighters can retreat to without possible interference. Those requested 'safe zones' seem to fit that bill rather nicely.
I read it and to me, there was nothing insane about it, it seemed to simply be asking that law enforcement act like the public servants they are instead of an occupying military force
I have no love for common street thugs, but MOST of the protesters aren't any such thing. Of course, government propaganda dispensed by the mainstream media would have you believe otherwise.
Besides, even if all the protesters WERE thugs, we need to keep things in perspective. Common street hoodlums pose a relatively minor threat to lives and property that is easily minimized. The police mafia is a much greater threat, and it seeks nothing less than the total domination of your life. If I have to take sides here, it sure won't be that of the pigs.
8 comments:
The "protesters" kind of put themselves in a corner for the inevitable exhoneration. They have to break other peoples stuff and generally act like a bunch of assholes after all of their social justice, righteous indignation, 400 years of slavery street theater bullshit antics.
And those people wonder why no one other than white guilt ridden hipsters and opportunistic politicians like them.
Re #8: Would they prefer #00 and FMJ?
_revjen45
Number 11 reminds me of Lon Chaney in The Hunchback of Notre Dame at the door of the church yelling "Sanctuary".
Additionally they don't want their private information made public, but they can protest in front of officers homes? In my opinion if you're a protestor, you're a public figure.
If I recall one of the requirements for success in 4th generation warfare is a 'sanctuary' where the fighters can retreat to without possible interference. Those requested 'safe zones' seem to fit that bill rather nicely.
They forgot "Cops must tie one hand behind their backs"
I read it and to me, there was nothing insane about it, it seemed to simply be asking that law enforcement act like the public servants they are instead of an occupying military force
I'm in agreement with "bitter clinging Texan"....seem to be just asking LEOs to act like professionals when faced with a riled up group of citizens.
I have no love for common street thugs, but MOST of the protesters aren't any such thing. Of course, government propaganda dispensed by the mainstream media would have you believe otherwise.
Besides, even if all the protesters WERE thugs, we need to keep things in perspective. Common street hoodlums pose a relatively minor threat to lives and property that is easily minimized. The police mafia is a much greater threat, and it seeks nothing less than the total domination of your life. If I have to take sides here, it sure won't be that of the pigs.
Post a Comment