Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Turnabout IS fair play.

That didn't take long.
Why Can’t We Publish Addresses Of New York Times Reporters?


Anonymous said...

Screw Darren Wilson. Even supposing that the Brown shooting was justified, Wilson is still a little punk. I've seen the video of him telling a (polite) citizen that he was going to "lock his ass up" for filming him with a camera phone.

Besides, in a police state, the police are the enemy. Wilson was a member of the Blue Bacon Mafia that seeks to make serfs of us all. I'm glad his address was published. I think we should know as much about the cops as they know about us.

As for those reporters, the only people who might care to pay them a visit are the pigs (who can already get anyone's address) and maybe their authoritarian sycophants. So it's no big loss for them even if their addresses do go public.

III% in the Media said...

Nawww. It would be wrong to publish their addresses, so I won't be posting these:

CHICAGO, IL 60660-4204

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70119-3203

Mitch Rapp said...

However bad you think Wilson is, Michael Brown was worse and deserved what he got. I only wish his parents could be charged with conspiracy to release dangerous nuisance felon on the public.

What'sa matter "Turnabout"? Don't want folks to know who you are and where you live?

PO'd American said...

Provide the link of the video. If you have evidence that he acted improperly take it to the DA. This action reminds me of the NY whore that published all of the addresses of the CC in NY. Please tell me what was her motive?

Anonymous said...

Yes Mike, of course we can. We are allowed, and we are able.

Anonymous said...


Take a look at Gus Bailey's comments...

Anonymous said...

Those publishing scurrilous comments on our LEOs might want to consider the consequences. We absolutely need for our LEOs to be the most moral and honest among us. Publicly attacking and disparaging their character only means we'll get a lower class - and morality - - of aspirants to the badge. >Jeff

Anonymous said...


No, Michael Brown was NOT worse than Darren Wilson.

Brown was just some dumb kid, a two-bit hood. Did you ever do anything wrong when you were a teenager?

Darren Wilson is part of an institution that believes it has the absolute right to dominate you in every way: to spy on you, insult you, humiliate you, harm you, steal from you, and even kill you. And your loved ones. This applies to you, me, and everyone else who isn't a cop or someone else with governmental "authority."

Michael Brown was never a threat to your freedom or mine. Darren Wilson and his kind are exactly such a threat. (It bears mention that they pose that threat only by dint of their association with a nationwide, state-sanctioned street gang. On an individual basis nearly all cops are sissies who will run from a fair fight.)

If a common thug attempts to victimize you, then by all means, deal with him. Otherwise, we all need to remember who the enemy is and keep our focus.