Saturday, October 25, 2014

Clinton's "Forehead" gets his panties in a wad over Thomas Jefferson's view of the Second Amendment.

"Candidate's gun remarks should scare us."
No, usurper, they should scare YOU.


Anonymous said...

I like this woman already! Wish we'd get candidates like her in NY

Anonymous said...

Chicken shit bastard closed comments when it didn't look like it was going the way he wanted it to.

Be afraid collectivists! Be very afraid!

JohninMd.(HELP!?!! said...

The Constitution gave Congress the right to tax the whisky in western Pa, as interstate commerce. The govt's been playing fast and loose with the Constitution for 50 yrs., to the open disregard Obola has for the Founders, they've been lucky armed resistance has _NOT_ broken out!

Anonymous said...

"Oh, Sir, we should have fine times indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people. Your arms wherewith you could defend yourselves, are gone; and you have no longer an aristocratical; no longer democratical spirit. Did you ever read of any revolution in a nation, brought about by the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no power at all? You read of a riot act in a country which is called one of the freest in the world, where a few neighbors cannot assemble without the risk of being shot by a hired soldiery, the engines of despotism. We may see such an act in America."
= Patrick Henry, June 5, 1788

Anonymous said...

I noticed that he closed the comments section too.

They simply can't tolerate being told how wrong they are.

The FACT is, the Founders themselves fired on the gov't that claimed authority over them for abusing their rights, history shows this as fact, and we all know it here.

We also know how the actual shooting started- when they came for the colonists guns at Lexington and Concord.

They can try to obfuscate, deny, and ostracize individuals and organizations who know this truth all they want, but they can't change the facts.

And the FACT is, the 2A wasn't something the founders had to call upon as law, each and every gun they had was "illegal" when it was turned on the king that demanded unwavering loyalty and submission to his whims.

This is because this isn't about the second amendment, this is about peoples natural right to resist tyranny by force, when tyrants attempt to use force to impose it.

Sycophantic bureaucrat lick-spittles like this Paul Begala just can't understand that.

Miles said...

"Sycophantic bureaucrat lick-spittles like this Paul Begala just can't understand that."

Oh, they understand that. They understand it all to well.

And they're scared shitless that one day a variegated bunch of Americans will decide to take matters back into their own hands and the invitations to the festivities will include them.