Monday, January 26, 2009

Praxis: Home-Made Bandoleers From Home Depot Nail Aprons.

Many thanks to ChuckAtPodunkOutpost for directing me to TCM's excellent post here.

Home-Made Bandoleers (or Bandoliers, if you prefer...)

Sorry to be late getting this post up. I've been indescribably swamped at work since mid-December and it's only now easing up enough for me to do things like sleep and post.

Those who know Fûze fairly well know that he's the crowned king of DIY (Do It Yourself). I'm not sure there are many "sweat equity" production projects he's not willing to attempt: AK building, brewing, reloading, tanning, butchering, etc. He's not afraid of tools nor reckless experimentation. Fûze doesn't undertake these efforts to save money so much as to acquire the skills/knowledge they require. And if my fawning over his aptitude in this regard doesn't make it obvious, I'm horribly jealous. Being the perfectionist that I am, I'm less willing to tolerate failure and, thus, less likely to experiment. But I have my moments.

There has been some discussion of late on various rifleman websites concerning the dearth of mil-surp bandoleers, specifically those for 5-round 7.62 NATO stripper clips. I have a few of the Aussie bandoleers for this application and they are indeed nice. But I like my SKSs and AKs, too, and I wanted something to hold 10-round 7.62x39 stripper clips. Having solved this for myself a few years back, I thought I'd discuss my DIY solution with you folks -- our four dedicated readers.

I started out with a mess of these:

That's a Home Depot two-pocket nail pouch. They're heavy cotton and have two narrow tie straps at each end. The cost was a whopping 77¢ each. I ripped-out the middle (double) stitching -- which took no small amount of time -- and turned each one inside-out to hide the violently orange HD logo. Then I had three vertical stitches run, making four pockets. Like this:

Not wanting the end result to be white, I picked up some fabric dye in "earth tone" colors. In this case, green, brown, and black. The original project involved 36 pouches so I dyed 12 in each of the three colors. Using a stainless steel kitchen sink, I submersed each batch of 12 pouches in the (very hot!) water-and-dye mix and let them marinate for about a 1/2-hour, stirring occasionally. I then rinsed each batch several times and ran them thru the washer-n-dryer to remove what dye was remaining and to shrink them to their final size. (I washed each batch separately to prevent color bleeding.) I ended up with this:

The lighting made the colors a little weird; they're darker than what's in the pic. Trust me, they're green, brown, and black! (OK, maybe not black, but definitely charcoal...)

Each of the four pouch pockets will easily hold three 10-round 7.62x39 stripper clips, for a total of 120 rounds:

Doing the (simple) math, that's enough to fully recharge four 30-round AK mags or prep your SKS barrel for heat treating!

Just as an experiment, I took one of the pouches and applied some sew-on hook-n-loop (aka, Velcro) tabs to the top of each pocket. I thought this might offer some additional "retention security". It did, marginally, but I didn't think the ROI justified the effort and I didn't bother to "upgrade" any of the other pouches.

So, since this post was initially prompted by blogs addressing 7.62 NATO pouches, I wanted to see how mine worked with those 5-round stripper clips. The result was this:

I can get six charged stripper clips into each pocket. They seem to be retained well enough, but only a "march thru the boonies" experiment would tell. I can say that due to the depth of the pocket, the bottom three clips are kinda' tricky to retrieve. Not impossible, but I'd hate to be fussing with it while dodging incoming fire. (YMMV...) If someone wanted to apply these bandoleers specifically to 7.62 NATO stripper clips, they could simply cut each pouch in half horizontally and restitch the bottom.

And just to see what else we can stick in these pockets I tried these 30-round mags:

As far as I'm concerned, the AK mags are a "no-go". Too top heavy and they'd likely rattle. The AR mags would work in a pinch. They're not held very securely, though the pouches would probably work well with 20-round'ers. Then again, showing up at a firefight with 20-round AR mags is akin to showing up at a firefight with an AR. (Did I say that??...) The pockets will not hold M14, FAL, or HK-91 mags, though I suspect sewing the pouches for three pockets would do that nicely. Obviously, there's plenty of room in each pocket for M1 Garand en blocs, though they don't occupy the space optimally.

So, there's a weekend DIY project for ya'. Not a lot of moving parts and it can be done while catching your favorite "athletic entertainment programming" on the talkin' picture box.


MBV: Of course, you'll want to sew attachment points (D-rings, for example) and a shoulder strap. Still, GREAT improvisation.


Anonymous said...

Now that's thinkin' outside the box. Well done. Many other applications are possible...


Anonymous said...

I not sure what the problem with 20round mags is. They are a hell of a lot handier then 30's or 40's. Not to mention that if you are in a situation where you need 30 rounds rather then 20 rounds, I submit that you are already over your head.

Just sayin'.

Anonymous said...

Really, there is NO problem with 20 round magazines. They were just an extrapolation of the "volume of fire" methodology that sprang from the Korean conflict and grew as time went on. Can't be too awfully critical, though, because that mindset gave us the M-14 type rifle (a "product improved" Garand), which was the answer to human wave attacks by the Chinese in Korea.

After watching folks train with semi-automatic rifles in AQT marksmanship, 20 round magazines are the 'edge of the envelope' in my humble and very biased view point.

Just my .02

Torque said...

Where are the cardboard inserts to keep the noise down?

Oh, They are still attached to the cereal boxes on the shelf? Make sure to grab them and cut them out before the boxes land in the recylce bin.



Unknown said...

i know everyone has their "pet" firearm, but no need to dis the AR. anyone who blatantly disparages ARs and their wielders makes me instantly wonder if they've ever ACTUALLY been in a firefight, or if they are just spouting their favorite, untested philosophy. there's no doubt, bigger is better in many cases. right tool for right job. but i can tell you that a 223 will kill a person just fine. the rounds are lighter and therefore you can lay down more suppressing, which is important, especially if you don't have a MG in your team. oh yeah, in america MGs are mostly outlawed. besides all that, except for the slight off-chance zombie hords apocalypse, where are you going to be planning to get into a firefight?