Saturday, January 26, 2013

Another country heard from. Paul M. Bangiola, Esq. Responds to Bruce Krafft

"Well Bruce, you have convinced me that you are probably somebody to worry about. But, I still don’t think you represent most gun owners. many of whom I know and who are disgusted by people who own stupid guns like Bushmasters, the cynical politicization of gun violence for profit by the NRA, and those wannabe leaders-without-followers like you, who talk about armed rebellion when they are upset that their candidate didn’t get the most votes in a recent election, or maybe just because they are unhealthy social misfits, with unmet needs of one kind or another."


bruce said...

I will own any gun I feel like owning not what you approve rump swab.

LordChamp said...

Alinsky at it's best. Call name, marginalize, belittle, but provide no facts.

I responded to the idiot on his site too. I know, a waste of good logic, but I love irritating liberals with facts.

Anonymous said...

Well golly gee, if us anti-hoplophobes were even remotely as dangerous oo scary or mad or whatever he is labeling (or would that be LIBELING?) us as we would ALREADY have come after his sorry butt.......the mere fact that he is still breathing proves we are not what he claims

oughtsix said...

Complete waste of time.

Fucking COMPLETE waste of time...

for either side.

Once more into the breach, dear friends...

We are not debating, arguing, factualizing, enumerating, statisticing, much less voting, grass roots organizing, caucusing, or in any way politicizing OUR WAY OUT OF THE INEVITABLE RESULTS of the last hundred years of the progressive/communist/fascist/globalist-mercantilist assault on Constitutional Liberty

Which leaves ... What?

No one gets out of here alive....

That includes you.

Why not die for something worthy of a good death?

Today is a good day to die, if the Cause is Just.

It is.

Mr Jones said...

I posted this on the linked article. I re-post it here in the event it doesn't survive the "moderation" process.

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the
people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments,
to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers
are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more
insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can
admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several
kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will
bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is
not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off
their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of
local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national
will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia,
by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia,
it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every
tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions
which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America
with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights
of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects
of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.
Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that
they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment,
by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious
measures which must precede and produce it.
The argument under the present head may be put into a very concise
form, which appears altogether conclusive. Either the mode in which the
federal government is to be constructed will render it sufficiently dependent
on the people, or it will not. On the first supposition, it will be
restrained by that dependence from forming schemes obnoxious to their
constituents. On the other supposition, it will not possess the confidence
of the people, and its schemes of usurpation will be easily defeated by
the State governments, who will be supported by the people."

Federalist No.46

-continued below -

William V Wood said...

This guy needs to rethink what he is saying, because if we are what he is implying, he would be dead by now. Sorry Paul old buddy old pal, we got better thing to do.

bubba said...

We are a free country, a place where even the ignorati try to express their opinions, and understanding that, I simply don’t find their arguments wishing to disarm me very convincing. They may have desires on how society should function but their opinions do not have a correlation to the true facts of life. Their ignorance surrounding firearms is breathtaking and their understanding of gun-safety is child like. The paranoia they have about firearms is not fitting for grown, intelligent adults and certainly is no reason for honorable and thoughtful citizens to surrender their legally owned property and their liberty.

Our would-be tyrants purposefully pretend to misunderstand our clearly stated and easily understood positions on liberty. According to them majority opinion (as long as it agrees with their own) trumps everyone's God given, natural human rights, codified (not granted) by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

They claim we are violent and that we shouldn’t be allowed to exercise our God given rights without any evidence to prove our perfidy other than our words of self defense. They do understand that the ultimate purpose of our weapons is for our essential defense against threats such as Union-thugs, Criminals, the Majority and tyrannical Politicians. In reality they must understand a potential response from us, to their usurpation's of our rights, is with the very means of their fear as millions of us will not comply with their wishes and we are willing and able to defend our rights.