Sipsey Street Irregulars: Halvorson defeat less about guns than race-based voting

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Halvorson defeat less about guns than race-based voting

What the Halvorson loss signifies instead is a profound hypocrisy from race-based voters who continually reelect the likes of Marion Barry and anti-gun gun criminal Bobby Rush. That’s because this is the same faction that accuses white voters, who disagree with Barack Obama on matters of politics and policy, of voting against him because they’re racists.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...: Bah! Serves 'em all right to live in the hell they voted for themselves. If only it could be confined to Chicago, instead of spreading to the Red Shed (White House), and thus infecting the rest of the country.

B Woodman
III-PER; March 17, 2013 at 10:13 PM
Anonymous said...: Once again I got "Bit in the Butt" by one of the "EXAMINER" advertising stories. I absolutely hate it when my entire computer screen gets covered by some advertising and once I (X) out of that I end up having to MUTE the Progressive Insurance ads plus at least one or two more. Codura might be needing money to live off of but IT PISSES ME OFF to have to wade thru this BLANTANT CRAP. There are other ways to advertise and not to SLAP ME IN THE FACE.
It won't be long before I will checking each and every story I see on this site to decide whether or not I want to have unwelcome ADVERTISING crammed in my FACE.; March 19, 2013 at 2:14 AM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Halvorson defeat less about guns than race-based voting

2 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers