As the article points out, this puts into proper perspective that curious admission in the NYT that "assault weapons" was a manufactured category and a manufactured crusade. It's because they're shifting to bolt action rifles as the latest terror.
Nothing is random or accidental with the Democrat-Media Complex.
Gabby pushes to limit gun accessibility to the very women who may need it to protect their lives from abusive men in their lives. What a moron. Makes me think the brain damage is a lot more significant than we've been told.
Of course, this is from the same person that prior to being shot in the head, lied repeatedly about the FairTax to keep support from growing.
So she may just be stupid now, but prior to her shooting....she was evil as well.
How about ILLINOIS where it's already "illegal" to "shoot deer" with a rifle? Don't think it can't happen when it already has!
As for the article - aww it's just a "botched" "rollout".
Now, the reality is that this is actually OLD HAT! It's the same old "technological advancement" argued employed forever. This really is just the -only muskets are protected while semis select fires AND even bolt and lever actions are ummmm not protected. And that's why the abandoning of "assault weapons" .... Just like abandoning "global warming" and renaming it "climate change"!!! Same substance with a different name! We gotta tell the truth. And here's a place to start - we call them Fudds but what they REALLY are is DEMOCRAT NRA members.....
Just bought a 6.5-284 Savage 111. With the right ammunition, it's a 1200 yard rifle- if the shooter can do her part. Most can't...
A computer/laser/advanced algorithm/senser suite grafted onto the rifle scope might help an EXPERIENCED user. Don't think it will do jack for an ignorant one. Even less so if the ammunition is loaded by someone who has no clue.
I once found myself taking "sniper fire" from a guy who thought allah would guide the bullets from his busted up Druganov. He met the appropriate end. I assure you it takes more than what you mentioned above. It is a good start, but having the right tools and the correct application of learned skills, will get you a whole lot farther.
Owning a peasant army rifle is a start, but just a start.
"Nothing is random or accidental with the Democrat-Media Complex."
No it's the MARXIST-Media Complex.
The democratic party is being used as a Marxist base and because they have every protection and concealment that they can afford themselves, they have been wildly successful.
So much so that we see a blossoming Socialist "lite" movement within the republican party, which now does everything it can to see that only Marxist democrats get elected. This is called penetration, and the republican "leadership" is definitely in their control.
The theory and practices are that, if you control both party leaderships, you always get a Marxist win, ibn policy or elected officials, regardless if it is a "LITE" one or not.
If you want to know what it takes to make 1200-1600 yards shots, go to youtube and search "sniper 101," by a guy called Tibosaurus Rex. A long series of videos, I've watched ~20 hours so far, and still a long way to go.
It is VERY hard, takes a lot of work to get that good...
19 comments:
Wait, I know this game.....
"...Given the PARING KNIFE 's deadly accuracy, no one is safe - this cannot be allowed..."
How'd I do?
If they decide to come for them, the will find out just how correct they are...
LOL....the Fudds thought they'd be eaten last.
Disagree on "deadly accurate" sniper rifles being disallowed.
Agree that prohibitionists and would be tyrants should be very afraid of patriots with "deadly accurate" sniper rifles.
So afraid that they change their minds about promoting tyranny.
As the article points out, this puts into proper perspective that curious admission in the NYT that "assault weapons" was a manufactured category and a manufactured crusade. It's because they're shifting to bolt action rifles as the latest terror.
Nothing is random or accidental with the Democrat-Media Complex.
Yeah sure, banning scoped Bolt Actions in PA. Like that will actually happen. What will the 950,000 deer hunters in the state use now?
somebody please use one of these fancy guns on Fineman and let me know how it worked
Gabby pushes to limit gun accessibility to the very women who may need it to protect their lives from abusive men in their lives. What a moron. Makes me think the brain damage is a lot more significant than we've been told.
Of course, this is from the same person that prior to being shot in the head, lied repeatedly about the FairTax to keep support from growing.
So she may just be stupid now, but prior to her shooting....she was evil as well.
How about ILLINOIS where it's already "illegal" to "shoot deer" with a rifle? Don't think it can't happen when it already has!
As for the article - aww it's just a "botched" "rollout".
Now, the reality is that this is actually OLD HAT! It's the same old "technological advancement" argued employed forever. This really is just the -only muskets are protected while semis select fires AND even bolt and lever actions are ummmm not protected. And that's why the abandoning of "assault weapons" .... Just like abandoning "global warming" and renaming it "climate change"!!! Same substance with a different name!
We gotta tell the truth. And here's a place to start - we call them Fudds but what they REALLY are is DEMOCRAT NRA members.....
So semiautomatic 'sniper' rifles will be OK ... and Fudds will be disarmed?
Problems solved ...
III
Anonymous said...
Yeah sure, banning scoped Bolt Actions in PA. Like that will actually happen. What will the 950,000 deer hunters in the state use now?
Answer: Paring knifes!! They are deadly accurate.
Next the Fudds will be screetching about their 2nd Amendment 'right' to hunt!
Who knows - maybe this will finally open some eyes.....
Merle
But... Sarah Brady bought just such a rifle as a gift to her son a few years ago? What gives?
Just bought a 6.5-284 Savage 111. With the right ammunition, it's a 1200 yard rifle- if the shooter can do her part. Most can't...
A computer/laser/advanced algorithm/senser suite grafted onto the rifle scope might help an EXPERIENCED user. Don't think it will do jack for an ignorant one. Even less so if the ammunition is loaded by someone who has no clue.
All you need to be a sniper is a rifle, a target, a good eye, a steady hand, and hard heart. The tool is immaterial.
Badanov,
I once found myself taking "sniper fire" from a guy who thought allah would guide the bullets from his busted up Druganov. He met the appropriate end. I assure you it takes more than what you mentioned above. It is a good start, but having the right tools and the correct application of learned skills, will get you a whole lot farther.
Owning a peasant army rifle is a start, but just a start.
"Nothing is random or accidental with the Democrat-Media Complex."
No it's the MARXIST-Media Complex.
The democratic party is being used as a Marxist base and because they have every protection and concealment that they can afford themselves, they have been wildly successful.
So much so that we see a blossoming Socialist "lite" movement within the republican party, which now does everything it can to see that only Marxist democrats get elected. This is called penetration, and the republican "leadership" is definitely in their control.
The theory and practices are that, if you control both party leaderships, you always get a Marxist win, ibn policy or elected officials, regardless if it is a "LITE" one or not.
If you want to know what it takes to make 1200-1600 yards shots, go to youtube and search "sniper 101," by a guy called Tibosaurus Rex. A long series of videos, I've watched ~20 hours so far, and still a long way to go.
It is VERY hard, takes a lot of work to get that good...
Post a Comment