I have written before on the regime "losing the mandate of heaven." Here is WSJ's James Taranto on "A Crisis of Authority."
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
What is it when a pervert calls somebody else a pervert? Professional opinion or projection? A collectivist constitutional pervert's view of the Second Amendment.
Here's a government monopoly of violence Horwitz would logically endorse.
Government-monopoly-of-violence advocate Horwitz is at it again: The NRA's Perverted View of America
And you know what NOBODY is reporting about Burke's criminality? That he was ALWAYS and remains to this day JANET NAPOLITANO'S LAPDOG.
Fox News tried unsuccessfully to contact Burke, who recently formed a security and lobbying firm with former Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan, Chicago White Sox and Chicago Bulls Chairman Jerry Reinsdorf and Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano's Chief of Staff Noah Kroloff.The Office of Inspector General is an investigative arm that monitors the Justice Department. It tried to interview Burke, but he resigned.The IG said Burke violated numerous federal and professional rules of conduct and it would forward a copy of its report to the Arizona State Bar Association for disciplinary conduct.
And you know what NOBODY is reporting about Burke's criminality? That he was ALWAYS and remains to this day JANET NAPOLITANO'S LAPDOG. That's why he was picked to ramrod F&F in the first place. He was politically reliable.
When the rest of society increasingly looks like Sodom and Gomorrah, I suppose this shouldn't be a surprise.
While men are statistically more loathe to report their sexual victimization than are women, 10,700 male soldiers, sailors and airmen in 2010 actually reported their sexual assaults. What this means is not totally clear, since men are cannot technically be raped, (!?!?!) despite the term being regularly used in the recent hearings on the matter.
We used to execute rapists, of whatever stripe. Can you really say we're better off now because we no longer do? Heck, with DNA and other forensic advances, we have less reason NOT to execute the bastards these days.
Monday, May 20, 2013
"Important Update to Perazzi Story." Somebody's lying here, but who? It sure ain't David Codrea.
Even later: Stonewall. Cincinnati Ground Zero of Exploding IRS Scandal, But Answers Hard to Find
Please circulate this link to all your friends: Don't Comply.
The Stasi perfected the technique of psychological harassment of perceived enemies known as Zersetzung – a term borrowed from chemistry which literally means "corrosion" or "undermining".By the 1970s, the Stasi had decided that methods of overt persecution which had been employed up to that time, such as arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung was designed to side-track and "switch off" perceived enemies so that they would lose the will to continue any "inappropriate" activities.Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim’s private or family life. This often included breaking into homes and messing with the contents – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included smear campaigns, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds, and mental breakdowns and suicide could result.One great advantage of the harassment perpetrated under Zersetzung was that its subtle nature meant that it was able to be denied. That was important given that the GDR was trying to improve its international standing during the 1970s and 80s. Zersetzung techniques have since been adopted by other security agencies, particularly the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).
Fears of a tyrannical government, willing to break any law, and sacrifice any number of lives for its agenda, are no longer the exclusive province of "conspiracy theorists." In light of these scandals, is it really so difficult to believe that the Obama administration would deliberately facilitate mass murder on both sides of the Mexican border, including the killings of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and ICE Agent Jaime Zapata, in order to advance the "gun control" agenda? Is it not, in fact, more difficult to put such evil past these people?