A more likely explanation is that there's something in their files that if it came to light in court it would be damaging to the present administration.
That means, by definition, something the Iranian group has found out (and turned over to the US Gov), but the administration has not admitted, or has taken credit for, or has lied to cover up.
4 comments:
Ah yes, the ol' "any Palomino is a pal-o'-mine-o" defense. Bet if one of us tried to sue SPLC you'd get the same treatment
A more likely explanation is that there's something in their files that if it came to light in court it would be damaging to the present administration.
"United Against Nuclear Iran"? Not a group with government (or crony) connections? Don't make me laugh.
That means, by definition, something the Iranian group has found out (and turned over to the US Gov), but the administration has not admitted, or has taken credit for, or has lied to cover up.
Pick one.
Post a Comment