Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Colorado enforcement dilemma shows exploitable weakness of anti-gun laws

Despite duplicitous “progressives” like Democrat State Senator John Kefalas of Fort Collins trying to put a happy face on Colorado’s most recent anti-gun edicts by making contradicted-by-reality claims that they have been “useful and effective in denying people who shouldn't have firearms,” the laws are demonstrably unenforceable failures. . .
A fundamental truth more and more gun owners are awakening to is that just as arms can discourage individual aggressors, so too does that principle work at a societal level. As long as that holds true, it means the Second Amendment is working as a deterrent. And while the need has never been greater for gun owners to involve themselves in doing what they can to use civil means to restore freedom, through elections, through educating their countrymen, through lawsuits and the like, one inescapable conclusion is becoming increasingly evident: The Founders were visionary in recognizing the necessity of an armed citizenry for the security of a free State in times when choices are reduced to surrender or resist.

3 comments:

Galaxie_Man said...

Hee, Hee, Hee! I love seeing these articles! Hey biased media...keep spreading the word about the armed civil disobedience, defiance, non-compliance, evasion, smuggling, etc., because the more people hear about it, the more inclined they will become to participate.

And to those that believe they rule over us, you just keep fretting about what to do....AND DO NOTHING!! The consequences of attempted enforcement will be severe.

From behind enemy lines in Kommiecticut.

Anonymous said...

"Duplicitous 'progressives'" -- from The Department of Redundancy Department

Anonymous said...

Good example of how background checks work:


http://www.king5.com/story/news/local/marysville-shooting/2015/03/31/marysville-pilchuck-shooting-father-arrested/70725850/