Showing posts sorted by relevance for query for breakfast. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query for breakfast. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

"What they eat for breakfast." -- Washington D.C.'s "Top Fifty Party Animals."

Michael Collins

Michael Collins: How long has that man been there?
IRA local man: As long as we have. Half an hour or so.
Michael Collins: How'd they know we were coming?
IRA local man: They know what we ate for breakfast.
Michael Collins: There's only one way to beat them, then.
IRA local man: How?
Michael Collins: Find out what they eat for breakfast.

Later --
"I want a file drawn up on every member of the British administration. Look through whatever you can find. Who's Who. Stubb's, Society columns. I want names, addresses, clubs, where they bank down to what they eat for breakfast. Keep it up to date. Add to it every week." -- Michael Collins, 1996.

Top 50 party animals (from Politico.com)


By ANNE SCHROEDER MULLINS & PATRICK GAVIN | 9/8/09 1:15 AM EDT

In the nation’s capital, social events are as mandatory as staff meetings. Whether you are a senior senator or a first-year staffer, a clever strategist or a budding journalist, the best way to move up is to make friends. “Creating and maintaining relationships are vital in a town where information is power,” says Republican operative and favorite party guest Ron Bonjean.

To facilitate this exchange, Washington has established a vibrant ecosystem of social events unlike any other city. Here at POLITICO, we’ve scoured the black-tie dinners, book parties and after-work happy hours to generate a list of the city’s Top 50 Party Animals.

But remember: A Washington party animal is not like any other. The very best don’t swing from the rafters or wake up on the roof. Instead, they hit a cocktail party after work, then make their way to a fundraiser and turn up later to toast a friend’s promotion. This list celebrates the partygoers that show up the most and throw the best events. Today, we list in alphabetical order 25 of the top 50 party animals in Washington.

You’ll find video interviews that make clear just how much personality these folks bring to the table. The web page for each party animal featured will be updated with video and links as CLICK roves the city for the best party news, gossip and good times.

Check back tomorrow for the remaining 25.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Those From Whom We Learn by Fred Marshall

My thanks to Jackie J. for passing this on to me:

Those From Whom We Learn

By Fred Marshall, Jr


In my formal but unscripted farewell speech when I retired from the Army, I mentioned that we all ought to look in the mirror occasionally and ask “Who am I?” The answer, I went on, is that we are little more than the grand sum total - - a composite, if you will - - of all the people we have known in our lives. As we live, we observe others. We take what we see that we like and try to emulate it. What we don’t like, we repudiate and avoid doing. For example, by the time I had become a First Sergeant, I had served under several of them, so I tried to combine the best of what I had seen in all of them, and then that was who I was when it came my turn. Of course I added a few twists of my own but, essentially, I was the grand sum total of the First Sergeants I had known.

Whenever you see a musician or movie star or professional athlete interviewed, the question is usually asked “Who had the greatest influence upon your (music) (acting) (playing) career?” They will each name one or more professionals who preceded them. And so it goes.

My military career was exceptionally successful and, while some might accuse me of bragging, I’m really quite proud but in an humble sort of way. Very little of that success was due to anything I did that was original or really innovative on my part, though it often appeared to be. Most of it was just reacting to situations in ways I had seen others successfully react. I’ve previously mentioned, in considerable detail, the impact the late Sergeant Major of the Army George W. Dunaway had upon my career and my life. Now, keenly aware that there are so many stories in us that we’ll never get to tell, I want to pay tribute to a U.S. Army Engineer named Earl Calvin Pope. He retired in the late 60s as a Command Sergeant Major at Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

On October 10th, 1962, I signed out of the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell with orders for Germany. I had a 14-day leave en route, which I took with my wife and first son at my Mom’s in Humboldt, Tennessee. On October 15th, I received a telegram from the Army at my Mom’s address instructing me to stay where I am until further notice. The Cuban Missile Crisis was underway, though the telegram didn’t say that.

The Crisis ended on October 28th but, a week later, I had received no further orders. Here I was out here in “no man’s land,” having already enjoyed what I hoped the Army would count as free leave time, and I wondered how long it would be before I would continue on to Germany. After two more weeks of hearing nothing, I went to Fort Campbell, records in hand, and learned that I had just been inadvertently overlooked. Makes a fella feel really important, huh?

Instead of sending me on to Germany, they made me sign back in so they could develop a new assignment for me. Overseas levies took four to six months in those days, that is, assignments developed today were to fill vacancies expected to occur four to six months hence. So, they assigned me to work at Post Engineers, a non-airborne slot with no jump pay to my chagrin, until a new assignment to Germany could be developed.

The Chief enlisted man there was Earl Calvin Pope, a 6 2 redheaded Master Sergeant who had a command and intimidating presence. I disliked him from the first time I laid eyes on him until shortly before I left for Germany five months later. Only with the passage of time would I come to appreciate this giant of a man. He smoked corncob pipes which he bought at the PX for ten cents apiece. They smelled awful, and he went through two a week, tossing and replacing them with new ones. In those days, smokers smoked at their desks all day long.

His job title was Chief Clerk, Post Engineers. He was responsible to the Post Engineer (a full colonel named Shelley, a professional engineer) for all the administration of Post Engineers, and he was over all the enlisted men who worked in the various departments and shops. I would come to learn over time that he was a walking calculator, encyclopedia, dictionary, index of Army Regulations, and a master carpenter and cabinet maker.

My background at that time had been all Infantry, with the exception of the 20 months I had spent as a jump school instructor. I knew absolutely nothing about administration, but I was about to learn, and what I would learn from Pope would prove to be a tremendous advantage in the coming years in my successive assignments.

Pope’s admin office was spacious. His desk sat where everyone who walked into the main entrance to the PE office had to walk past it. He had another desk brought in for me and placed it about six feet directly behind his and facing the same direction. That put me to looking at the back of his head all day, and that in itself was miserable. Behind me was a wall of bookshelves filled with Army Regulations, DA Pamphlets, Circulars, a wide variety of Army publications, and a ton of engineer specifications. I think Pope had every word of all of them committed to memory.

One day Colonel Shelley stepped out of his office and addressed Pope. He said “Sergeant Pope, somewhere there is a regulation related to the specifications for air conditioning in Capehart housing. Would you get it for me?”

Pope leaned back in his chair, looked into space halfway to the ceiling for a few moments, then he turned to me and said “Marshall, get me AR 385 dash 216 point 1 dash 4 (not the actual number). I went to a bookshelf, found a huge binder labeled “AR 385-216 and opened it up to section 1-4 and there the title read “Specifications for air conditioning in Capehart military housing.”

In high school I had taken typing, to avoid Latin or Physics I think, and had been a 70 wpm man at one time. Pope had found that information when screening my records to determine where to employ me for a few months. However, the Infantry doesn’t involve a helluva lot of typing practice, so I was rusty. But it didn’t take long to get back into the swing of things though, as a Staff Sergeant, I found typing and clerical work to be beneath my dignity. I hated it, and I despised Pope.

The Army has a correspondence manual which gives every detail of Army correspondence of all kinds, from letters to memorandums to you name it. Everything is standardized, with margins and spacing specified precisely for every type of written communication known to mankind. I had never seen a copy.

Pope would frequently hand me three or four lined-tablet pages of handwritten material someone had drafted and say “Type that up in one original and three carbon copies. After I learned the lingo, he’d simply say “one and three.” The way he would “hand” them to me was he’d lean back in his chair without turning around, he’d extend his left arm up and to the left, holding the papers, and say “Here you go.” That meant I was to get up and get to his hand before he had to turn around. I hated that.

When I’d finish a paper, and take it to him, he’d look at it briefly and say “It isn’t correct, redo it correctly, and hand it back to me.” In the beginning I’d ask “What’s wrong with it?” to which he’d reply, “Get the manual out and see what’s wrong with it.”

If the matter were urgent, Pope would pull out a retractable well in his desk, which held a portable typewriter, and he would type it himself and take it in to Colonel Shelley for signature and dispatch it. He typed at least 80 wpm. But he would make me retype it till I got it right. When it appeared that I had a paper done at least close to properly, he’d pluck a four-inch ruler from his shirt pocket and measure all four margins. When it was letter-perfect, then he’d toss it in the trash can. God, how I hated him. But I learned Army correspondence, from A to Z, and then some.

I also learned the Army’s Functional Filing System (TAFFS) from A to Z. It was an ingenious - - though complex - - and efficient system for the few who understood it. As a First Sergeant, I would later teach the system formally to first sergeant candidates, company clerks, company commanders, and others. I was considered Fort Benning’s “resident expert” on the system.

My wife, son and I had, by sheer chance, moved back into the very same set of family government quarters we had vacated when we had departed for Germany before the Cuban Missile Crisis. During the “down time,” the quarters had been refurbished and renovated and were much nicer than we had left them. That was about the only nice thing - - as I saw it then - - about having to wait those extra five months.

One morning I was scheduled for a dental appointment at 8:30. Office hours began at 8:00. I overslept that morning and awakened at ten minutes to eight, and had no way in hell of getting to the office by 8:00. So I called the office - - Pope was always there at a quarter to eight, so I knew he would answer the phone.

Trying to sound as casual as possible, I said “Sergeant Pope, I just wanted to remind you that I have a dental appointment at 8:30, so I’ll just go directly to the dental clinic, since it’s between here and the office, and be on to work as soon as I’m finished.” He sensed that I had overslept. He said, “Yes, I have that on my schedule, just be here at eight and I’ll send you along to the dental clinic.” He knew I couldn’t make it, so I had to admit I had overslept. I could make the appointment by 8:30, but I couldn’t be at the office at eight. So, I was caught when I had intended to lie my way out of oversleeping.

When I arrived at work around 10:30, he waited till I was settled into my desk. Then he picked up his cap and said, “Grab your hat and let’s go.” I asked, “Where are we going?” to which he repeated “Grab your hat.” I followed him to his car, a deep orange Opel stationwagon (German made) that was the most god-awful color I’d ever seen on a car. He drove to the PX, went in with me in tow, and bought a dozen corncob pipes, a box of pipe cleaners and some pipe tobacco. The purpose of taking me with him was to “counsel” me for oversleeping. Having me in the car with him guaranteed that I would have to listen to every word. It also took away the formality of being across his desk from him. His was a technique I would use many times, both with soldiers and with my children.

One Friday night, my wife and I got into a spat about something minor and she called the military police. There had been no physical contact, just a little yelling at each other. They arrested me and took me to the MP station, and I was furious. In such cases, the procedure was to call a supervisor or commander to come and pick up the arrested soldier. I had never been arrested by the military before. Once someone came in and signed for the “prisoner,” he was normally set free. I had them call Pope. He drove in, about 10 miles - - he lived in a new subdivision on the outskirts of Clarksville - - and picked me up. When he headed back off post, I said “I live here on post.” He said “I’ll take you to your quarters Sunday afternoon, after church, around 2 P.M. You’re going to meet the Pope family and cool off first. “But,” I said, I don’t have any clothes, underwear or toilet articles.” He said, “We’ll fix that, but you aren’t going home, so you may as well get used to the idea.”

Off post, he stopped at an all-night drug store and bought (and paid for) a complete set of toilet articles for me. He put me into his spare bedroom for the night. The next morning he gave me two sets of brand new boxer shorts and tee shirts. Saturday afternoon, he called my wife and dropped by - - without me - - and picked up a suit, white shirt, tie, shoes and socks, etc., for church. Most all day Saturday I watched him work on custom-made piece of furniture he was crafting. Sunday I went to church with his family and then he took me home.

Though we worked for Colonel Shelley, we were assigned to a headquarters company commanded by a captain. He was our commander. He approved our leaves and signed any personnel actions we might submit, or which might be submitted by others (such as recommendations for promotions, etc.).

One Friday afternoon, early in my fifth month with Pope, he called me outside the building for a smoke. We already knew my scheduled departure date was just a couple of weeks away. He told me he was taking leave all the following week and, though he would be at home constructing a storage building, he didn’t want to be bothered unless the President of the United States called. But if some emergency should arise, he would be at home. He made it clear to me that I would be running the office and that he did not want to be bothered.

Monday I sat at his desk. The day passed without incident. Around 9 A.M. on Tuesday morning, Colonel Shelley walked out to my (Pope’s) desk. He said “Where is Sergeant Pope?’ I said “He’s on leave this week, sir, but he’s at home if you need him.” He said, “I didn’t approve a leave for him, get him on the phone for me.”

I could already hear the ass-chewing that was coming, and I reveled at the thought of it. I reached Pope on the phone, alerted the colonel and waited for him to pick up. When he did, I hung up so they both heard my receiver hit the cradle. Then I quietly eased my receiver back up. I just HAD to hear this. This would, as Dirty Harry said, “make my day.”

Colonel Shelley: “Why aren’t you in the office, Sergeant Pope?’
Pope: “I’m on leave, sir, I’m doing a couple of projects at home.”
Colonel Shelley: “I didn’t approve a leave for you.”
Pope: “You don’t approve my leaves, sir, my company commander does that.”
Colonel Shelley: (after a brief pause) “How long do you plan to be gone?”
Pope: “All week sir.”
Colonel Shelley: “Well, who’s going to run the office and take care of all the things you handle so well?”
Pope: “If you’ll look at my desk, sir, you’ll find a young sergeant sitting there. Just give him anything you would give me and then don’t worry about it, it will be taken care of. He’s completely competent and, if he encounters anything unusually heavy, he can call me but I have instructed him not to.”
Colonel Shelley: “Well, why isn’t Master Sergeant Bledsoe sitting out there, he’s the next senior isn’t he?”
Pope: “Yes sir, but he has a full time job running his own section and, besides, Marshall’s more qualified to run your office for you than anyone in Post Engineers. I’ve already told all the NCOs that Marshall is in charge while I’m gone, and that’s that.”
Colonel Shelley: “I ought to call you back in off leave for not letting me know in advance.”
Pope: “You can certainly do that, sir, but may I suggest that you wait until you encounter a problem Marshall can’t handle, then I’ll deserve it. But in the meantime, just relax and go about your important business and call on Marshall whenever you need assistance in the little things I normally handle for you.”

At that point I quietly hung up my phone, totally in shock. I had never heard any kind of sergeant talk to a full colonel in such an authoritative, matter-of-fact yet with all due respect manner before….one more lesson that would serve me well in the future.

What I learned from Earl Calvin Pope (his wife called him Calvin) was invaluable. The acquired knowledge and proficiency in Army administration would open a lot of doors for me in the future, putting me head and shoulders above most of my peers, time and time again. It got me out of the Infantry for a few years - - I returned at my own request, because that’s where the rubber meets the road, and that’s where troop leadership is best practiced - - and into administering the 8th Division’s sports program in Germany, and a couple of special assignments, including one top-secret assignment in 1966 which directly led to my promotion to Sergeant First Class and, almost immediately, my first assignment as a First Sergeant long before I had achieved the rank of First Sergeant.

Earl Calvin Pope. I departed his world and went to Germany for the next four years. He was promoted to Sergeant Major and was later among the Army’s first batch of Command Sergeants Major when the new rank debuted in 1968. He retired in 1969. I was never to see or communicate with him again during my Army career. In fact, it would be 38 years before we talked again.

In 2000, while living in Columbus, Georgia, I attended a five-day reunion of the 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team at Fort Campbell, actually in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, to be more specific. While glancing through a Clarksville, Tennessee, area telephone book, I found “Earl C. Pope” listed in Palmyra, Tennessee, just outside Clarksville. I called. The man I sought answered. After nearly four decades, he remembered me in greater detail than I had ever dreamed. I could never forget him. We chatted and he met me the next morning at Shoney’s for breakfast and then led me to his home.

He was in his mid seventies. His wife had died. His children were grown. He lived alone, and most of the things in his home he had built himself, from cabinets to chests of drawers to coffee tables and end tables to dining room table and china cabinet to a kitchenette, complete with chairs, to bookshelves to a picnic table and benches, all of which he designed and built. The place was very unique and comfortable beyond belief. We spent the day talking. He loved beer (I had not remembered any beer in his home in 1962). I don’t care for beer, but I drank four that day and lived with the bloating for the next 24 hours. What a marvelous and heart-warming experience that day was.

I wanted this man to know that he had played more than a pivotal role in the successes I had enjoyed. I had learned so much from him, I couldn’t begin to itemize the ways and the times that I benefited from what he had taught me. I told him how much I had despised him at the time. He already knew it. But then he told me, “You’re among the top of my best success stories. You’ve paid me back tenfold by teaching and helping people as I taught and helped you. It doesn’t matter whether you liked me or not, it matters that you learned and taught others.”

That day will live with me till I die, as will all the lessons I learned from him. Earl Calvin Pope died in 2005, in the house he built and furnished. But he died knowing that, by teaching me, he taught (by proxy) a lot of very fine soldiers a lot of very valuable lessons of life. Rest in peace, Earl Calvin Pope. You’re gone, but you are remembered, and your influence on me is appreciated by people who never knew you.

In closing, Dear Hearts, most people die never knowing the many lives they have touched. If there is someone in your life who has impacted you in positive ways, who is still alive, let him/her know how much you appreciate him/her - - while you can.

Copyright August 2009
Fred Marshall Jr.
May be reproduced and
distributed in its entirety
only. All rights reserved.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

"We are everywhere." -- A call for all Sons of Liberty and Three Percenters who can to join the IRS plus a little task for those who can't .



In talking to a reporter yesterday I was asked, "Well, what are you going to do for an encore (to the Window War)?"

I assured him that I did not think the Window War was quite finished, and that it would revive with the attempts to "cram down" the global warming and amnesty bills in the coming months. Indeed, I can foresee that if any GOPer treats with the declared enemies of the Founders' Republic on these issues, the windows of BOTH parties will be broken, just as I posited in my short story The Window War, so many years ago.

"But is that it? Is that all?" he asked.

I merely smiled.

I didn't tell him, but, no. That is not all.



From the film Michael Collins, 1993:

Michael Collins to Royal Irish Constabulary "G Man" Ned Broy: What's this? What's all this? You've been on my heels for weeks. Very eager for a G man.

Broy: I've something for you. (Reaching inside his coat.)

Collins: Don't! (Sticking a revolver in Broy's neck.)

Broy: (Unfazed.) Don't you ever calm down? (Hands Collins a piece of paper.) Names and addresses of the whole cabinet. They're to be lifted tonight. It's an illegal gathering... in open defiance of His Majesty's government.

Collins: How'd you get this?

Broy: Like you said, I'm eager, for a G man.

Collins: Why should I trust you?

Broy: Logically, I suppose you shouldn't. But I've been on your heels for weeks... making notes of your speeches. Let's just say that you can be persuasive.

Collins: You work for the Castle for Christ's sake..

Broy: I know. What was it you said... "Our only weapon is our refusal".


Well, as my Michigan grandma once told me, when life hands you lemons, make lemonade.

Nancy Pelosi has given us a great opportunity in the new "Health Care" Law. She's hiring some 16,000 plus new Internal Revenue agents to enforce her tyranny. So, why can't some of those be Three Percenters? I mean, there's a bunch of us out of work, yet we have clean records and skills that would dovetail nicely with those required of an IRS agent. Hey, we would also have the advantage of actually meaning it when they swear us in -- you know, that oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Indeed, while the private sector is shrinking, government at most levels is still growing, so the IRS is not the only agency that could benefit from dozens, hundreds, thousands of Ned Broy's.

Sweet lemonade indeed.

Thanks a bunch, Nancy!

So sign up today! Our Dear Leader needs you to enforce the "Health Care" Act! Join. Learn. Lurk in the shadows, and await the right time and place to muck up the works. And you don't need a Michael Collins to report to. We have the Internet. Study Fourth Generation Warfare and open source insurgency at John Robb's Global Guerrillas site and others. Begin today. Leave no trace. Shut up about your politics. At the very least, we will cause the IRS to waste vast amounts of time and money trying to ferret out our Ned Broy's during the selection process. And if you make it through, study, watch and wait.

I can see whole reams of internal documents posted anonymously to the web, raids compromised with no one there when the door lock is blown in by those new 14 inch barrel entry shotguns. I can see an entire agency in a blue funk, eating at its own vitals.

Oh yes, join now, without delay.

And for those of you who cannot do this, I have this task which is the best force multiplier suggestion I can think of.

Today, we must begin a new campaign: We Are Everywhere.

For we are, you know. Our Socialist Mandarin masters like Nancy Pelosi rub elbows with us everyday, though they do not know it.

We carry their mail and packages.

We check out their groceries.

We clean out their drains, fix their wiring, install their alarm systems and hand them their lattes at Starbucks.

We ARE everywhere.

Everywhere.

They do not know this. It never enters their minds. Even if they knew it, they wouldn't care. We have no opinions, they believe, that they are bound to respect. In truth, they despise us. You can tell that by the sneering names they call us and by the arrogance with which they corruptly arrange tyrannical laws.

But they do not know that we are everywhere, passing through, or working in, their offices, their side businesses, their homes.

It is time to remind them.

Send them the message: We are everywhere.

There is no need to explain further. The message is the message.

So send them the message.

By little notes left in their morning papers.

By email, fax and letter.

By phone call.

It is no threat. "We are everywhere." Who is "we"? What do we mean "everywhere"? The message is the message. Nothing more is required. I suppose if you wanted to put a "III" on it, that would be okay, but keep it simple, keep it effective. The message is the message, and I can just see Eric Holder and his boys scratching their heads, trying to make a case out of three little words that by themselves threaten nobody.

Scrawl it in felt-tip pen on the restroom walls of federal buildings.

Leave it in the lockers at the athletic clubs they frequent.

Print it on stickers and slap them on the bumpers of their cars.

We are everywhere.

Paint it on sidewalks wherever it suits your fancy.

Put it on billboards for everyone to see.

We are everywhere.

Especially -- soon, thanks to Nancy Pelosi -- within the vitals of the Internal Revenue Service.

We are everywhere.

If you agree with this idea, pass it on. Let it go viral.

We are everywhere, Nancy.

Deal with it.

Mike Vanderboegh
The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters.
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com

PS: Oh, and thanks in advance for employing some of us.

PPSS: Threepers, I especially draw your attention to these guys: http://www.treas.gov/tigta/careers.shtml. TIGTA is like the "Internal Affairs" of IRS. Ought to be some great openings for Three Percenters there. Go for it!

"And remember, lads, find out what they eat for breakfast."

LATER: Carl Bussjaeger sends this design, done in a few easy strokes.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

David Codrea on Commie Times Columnist "Mr. Moustache."

This is Thomas Friedman, senior foreign affairs columnist for the New York Times.

No, wait, THAT'S Joseph Stalin, collectivist butcher of millions. THIS is Thomas Friedman, modern-day apologist for collectivist butchers.

Friedman, like Stalin before him, is very proud of his moustache. This has caused a number of people to make him and his "I know better than thou" attitude the subject of cartoons.



Sorry, folks, I picked up another bug on Friday and I've been knocked for a loop -- temp, alternate freezing and burning up, sensitive skin (?), nausea, etc. Didn't even look at the computer all day yesterday. Awoke today feeling better, but with 400 plus e-mails in the in box. One of the first I saw was this from David Codrea about a Thomas Friedman column in the New York Times.



"One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages. That one party can just impose the politically difficult but critically important policies needed to move a society forward in the 21st century."


Attached to the quote was David's reaction:

Shameful and treasonous. Typical unmasked New York Times apologia for tyranny. This almost makes me want the commies to take over just so they can enact their predictable purge of the "intelligentsia."

Anybody still think we can reason with cancer?

David Codrea


Friedman strikes a dictatorial pose.

Well, scratch a liberal, get a communist, I always said. And, no I don't think you can reason with cancer or any other type of collectivism.

Mike
III

This is where Thomas Friedman, advocate of the common collectivist dictator, lives.

"What does he eat for breakfast?" asks Michael Collins.

"Why does he want to know what I eat for breakfast?"

PS: Best "get well" call from yesterday. At the height of my misery, Bob Wright called me. His question: "Nobody came up behind you and stuck you with an umbrella, did they?"

Very funny, Bob. Very funny.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

It Can Be Done -- "Fate only picks on the cowards and quitters, So give 'em both barrels--and aim for the eyes."


Another listless night of pain and insomnia. This time I turned from the previous night's National Geographic to a small, slim, blue soft-covered volume from the early 1920's entitled It Can Be Done: Poems of Inspiration. Collected by Joseph Morris and St. Clair Adams and originally published in November 1921, it was incredibly popular in its day for mine is the twentieth printing from August 1925. Indeed, you can still find it in print on Amazon here. You can find on the 'net here at Gutenberg and here at Archive.org.

The copy I have came from the library of a maiden great aunt of my ex-wife's, Miss Grayce M. May, whose penciled signature is inside the front cover. The circumstances of my acquiring it are a bit hazy, but as I remember it was in the effects of one of my ex-wife's relatives after their passing and I was given leave to rummage through the books before the rest were donated or discarded. I will pass this one on to my son Matt when I shuffle off this mortal coil. I have had it now for at least thirty-five years and it is one my perennial favorites that I return to every now and then.

Here are some of my favorites from within, although some of the sentiments are, perhaps, decidedly un-Easter-like.


The Quitter by Robert William Service

When you're lost in the wild and you're scared as a child,
And death looks you bang in the eye;
And you're sore as a boil, it's according to Hoyle
To cock your revolver and die.
But the code of a man says fight all you can,
And self-dissolution is barred;
In hunger and woe, oh it's easy to blow--
It's the hell served for breakfast that's hard.

You're sick of the game? Well now, that's a shame!
You're young and you're brave and you're bright.
You've had a raw deal, I know, but don't squeal.
Buck up, do your damnedest and fight!
It's the plugging away that will win you the day,
So don't be a piker, old pard;
Just draw on your grit; it's so easy to quit--
It's the keeping your chin up that's hard.

It's easy to cry that you're beaten and die,
It's easy to crawfish and crawl,
But to fight and to fight when hope's out of sight,
Why, that's the best game of them all.
And though you come out of each grueling bout,
All broken and beaten and scarred--
Just have one more try. It's dead easy to die,
It's the keeping on living that's hard.

-- Robert W. Service, From "Rhymes of a Rolling Stone."



Battle cry by John G. Neihardt.


More than half beaten, but fearless,
Facing the storm and the night;
Breathless and reeling but tearless,
Here in the lull of the fight,
I who bow not but before thee,
God of the fighting Clan,
Lifting my fists, I implore Thee,
Give me the heart of a Man!

What though I live with the winners
Or perish with those who fall?
Only the cowards are sinners,
Fighting the fight is all.
Strong is my foe--he advances!
Snapt is my blade, O Lord!
See the proud banners and lances!
Oh, spare me this stub of a sword!

Give me no pity, nor spare me;
Calm not the wrath of my Foe.
See where he beckons to dare me!
Bleeding, half beaten--I go.
Not for the glory of winning,
Not for the fear of the night;
Shunning the battle is sinning--
Oh, spare me the heart to fight!

Red is the mist about me;
Deep is the wound in my side;
"Coward" thou criest to flout me?
O terrible Foe, thou hast lied!
Here with my battle before me,
God of the fighting Clan,
Grant that the woman who bore me
Suffered to suckle a Man!

-- John G. Neihardt, From "The Quest" (collected lyrics).




He Whom A Dream Hath Possessed by Seamus O'Sheel.

He whom a dream hath possessed knoweth no more of doubting,
For mist and the blowing of winds and the mouthing of words he scorns;
Not the sinuous speech of schools he hears, but a knightly shouting,
And never comes darkness down, yet he greeteth a million morns.

He whom a dream hath possessed knoweth no more of roaming;
All roads and the flowing of waves and the speediest flight he knows,
But wherever his feet are set, his soul is forever homing,
And going, he comes, and coming he heareth a call and goes.

He whom a dream hath possessed knoweth no more of sorrow,
At death and the dropping of leaves and the fading of suns he smiles,
For a dream remembers no past and scorns the desire of a morrow,
And a dream in a sea of doom sets surely the ultimate isles.

He whom a dream hath possessed treads the impalpable marches,
From the dust of the day's long road he leaps to a laughing star,
And the ruin of worlds that fall he views from eternal arches,
And rides God's battlefield in a flashing and golden car.

-- Sheamus O Sheel, From "The Lyric Year."


Success by Berton Braley.

If you want a thing bad enough
To go out and fight for it,
Work day and night for it,
Give up your time and your peace and your sleep for it
If only desire of it
Makes you quite mad enough
Never to tire of it,
Makes you hold all other things tawdry and cheap for it
If life seems all empty and useless without it
And all that you scheme and you dream is about it,
If gladly you'll sweat for it,
Fret for it,
Plan for it,
Lose all your terror of God or man for it,
If you'll simply go after that thing that you want,
With all your capacity,
Strength and sagacity,
Faith, hope and confidence, stern pertinacity,
If neither cold poverty, famished and gaunt,
Nor sickness nor pain
Of body or brain
Can turn you away from the thing that you want,
If dogged and grim you besiege and beset it,
You'll get it!

-- Berton Braley, From "Things As They Are."



Stand Forth! by Angela Morgan.

Stand forth, my soul, and grip thy woe,
Buckle the sword and face thy foe.
What right hast thou to be afraid
When all the universe will aid?
Ten thousand rally to thy name,
Horses and chariots of flame.
Do others fear? Do others fail?
_My soul must grapple and prevail_.
My soul must scale the mountainside
And with the conquering army ride--
Stand forth, my soul!

Stand forth, my soul, and take command.
'Tis I, thy master, bid thee stand.
Claim thou thy ground and thrust thy foe,
Plead not thine enemy should go.
Let others cringe! My soul is free,
No hostile host can conquer me.
There lives no circumstance so great
Can make me yield, or doubt my fate.
My soul must know what kings have known.
Must reach and claim its rightful throne--
Stand forth, my soul!

I ask no truce, I have no qualms,
I seek no quarter and no alms.
Let those who will obey the sod,
My soul sprang from the living God.
'Tis I, the king, who bid thee stand;
Grasp with thy hand my royal hand--
Stand forth!

-- Angela Morgan, From "The Hour Has Struck."




And finally, I think, my favorite of them all. I vividly recall Bob Wright's recitation of this poem of Grantland Rice's, entitled On Down the Road, at a militia FTX campfire back in 90s out at "Fort Stinking Desert," New Mexico. I knew it, of course, but nobody can recite it like Bob.

Hold to the course, though the storms are about you;
Stick to the road where the banner still flies;
Fate and his legions are ready to rout you--
Give 'em both barrels--and aim for their eyes.

Life's not a rose bed, a dream or a bubble,
A living in clover beneath cloudless skies;
And Fate hates a fighter who's looking for trouble,
So give 'im both barrels--and shoot for the eyes.

Fame never comes to the loafers and sitters,
Life's full of knots in a shifting disguise;
Fate only picks on the cowards and quitters,
So give 'em both barrels--and aim for the eyes.

-- Grantland Rice, From "The Sportlight."


Tuesday, September 8, 2009

GOA Alert on Cass Sunstein, "Killer Tomato" and the latest of Obama's stinking commie "czars." But what does he eat for breakfast?

Main Entry: ar·bi·ter
Pronunciation: \ˈär-bə-tər\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English arbitre, from Anglo-French, from Latin arbitr-, arbiter
Date: 14th century
1 : a person with power to decide a dispute : judge




Some of you may recall my post on Cass Sunstein, from 28 April, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes here wherein I identified Cass Sunstein as one of Obama's larger "killer tomatoes." At the time we were talking about his proposal to impose a "Fairness Doctrine" on the Internet.

Barack Obama's nominee for "regulatory czar" has advocated a "Fairness Doctrine" for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period.

The revelations about Cass Sunstein, Obama's friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in a new book by Brad O'Leary, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech." OIRA will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.

Sunstein also has argued in his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.

"A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government," he wrote. "Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's name."


Cass Sunstein, Killer Tomato.

We also talked about his proposal to ban hunting and give animals legal rights. Now GOA has just issued an e-mail alert on the killer commie vegetable (a "killer tomato" is red on the outside and red on the inside, that is, red through and through). Here it is, in large part:

Just when you thought the news about the Obama administration couldn't get any worse, gun owners find themselves needing to rally the troops once again.

This time it's the proposed "Regulatory Czar" who will be coming to a vote this week in the U.S. Senate.

His name is Cass Sunstein, and he holds some of the kookiest views you will ever hear.

For starters, Sunstein believes in regulating hunting out of existence. He told a Harvard audience in 2007 that "we ought to ban hunting." And in The Rights of Animals: A Very Short Primer (2002), he said:

I think we should go further ... the law should impose further regulation on hunting, scientific experiments, entertainment, and (above all) farming to ensure against unnecessary animal suffering. It is easy to imagine a set of initiatives that would do a great deal here, and indeed European nations have moved in just this direction. There are many possibilities. (Italics are his emphasis.)

If that's all Sunstein believed, he would be dangerous and extreme, but not necessarily kooky. Unfortunately, when you look at WHY he wants to restrict hunting, this is where he goes beyond extreme.

In Sunstein's world, animals should have just as many rights as people ... and they should be able to sue humans in court!

"We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).

Well, that's a relief ... he is at least willing to concede that animals are not persons! But he would still have animals suing humans, apparently, with more enlightened humans representing the cuddly critters.

Imagine returning from a successful hunting trip ... only to find out that you've been subpoenaed for killing your prize. Who knows, maybe Sunstein would have the family of the dead animal serving as witnesses in court!

By the way, if you're wondering what he thinks about the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, you won't be surprised to know that Sunstein is a huge supporter of gun control.

In Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts are Wrong for America (2005), Sunstein says:

Almost all gun control legislation is constitutionally fine.... [O]n the Constitution's text, fundamentalists [that is, gun rights supporters] should not be so confident in their enthusiasm for invalidating gun control legislation.

Hmm, what part of "shall not be infringed" does Sunstein not understand?

Imagine the power that Sunstein could have as the Regulatory Czar -- the nickname for the person heading the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the White House.

As the Regulatory Czar, he could bring about changes in the regulations that affect hunting, gun control and farming. In short, he could make your life hell.

Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) objected to his nomination several weeks ago, preventing him from being unanimously confirmed.

That means that the Senate will now need to garner 60 votes to confirm this radical, kooky choice to the OIRA.

No doubt, many of the people our President wants to associate with are radical kooks. First, there was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright ... then there was the self-avowed communist (Van Jones) who was nominated for the Green Jobs Czar ... now, there's an extreme animal rights activist who wants to take away our guns and get Bambi to sue us in court.

It's time to take a STRONG STAND against this radical administration.

ACTION: Please contact your Senators right away and urge them to vote AGAINST the Cass Sunstein nomination. You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your legislators the pre-written e-mail message below.


Please do as GOA requests. It's fer darn sure the NRA won't do anything. Ironic ain't it? We always told them that hunters and prags (who were trying to throw us "hard core evil black rifle" folks under the bus) were going to be next. Heck, it looks now as maybe they'll be first. How about it now, General Snowflake? Have you found your "line in the sand" yet?

But one thing is sure, Obama will find something for Sunstein to do, even if it is the next Supreme Court justice. Check this out.

Ironic, ain't it?

This is a blog that keeps track of "celebrity lawyers."

And they were all a-twitter about this back on Valentine's Day.

ATL World Exclusive: Paparazzi Photos of Cass Sunstein and Samantha Power!

Friday, February 27, 2009 12:17 PM - By David Lat

The world is obsessed with celebrity professors Cass Sunstein and Samantha Power, who recently left the ivory tower to take high-ranking positions in the Obama Administration. He might someday sit on the Supreme Court; she's a winner of the Pulitzer Prize; and together, as we previously reported (see the update), they're creating the World's Smartest Baby.

How many HLS grads turned Harvard professors get named Fun Couple of the 21st Century by Esquire? . . .

Check out paparazzi pics of the Power couple, after the jump. How did Percy Thrillington come across these shots?

A few months ago, during the first week of school, I noticed Sunstein and Powers in the parking lot, taking some stuff out of their car (I think moving it into Sunstein's office). Having followed your blog's coverage of this ultimate legal power couple, and having a camera handy, I inconspicuously took a few snapshots.

Maybe a little stalker-ish. But they were in public, and it's a free country, right?

Indeed. You don't need to be a Fourth Amendment expert to know that nobody has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a parking lot. Especially not legal celebrities like Cass 'n Sam.

To see the photos, spin through the slideshow below. As you'll see, there were no bodyguards in sight. The good professors were carrying their own things, unaided by an entourage -- or even a gaggle of research assistants.

Legal academic celebrities: they're just like us!


So, even if he is unable to be "Czar," maybe he can be a Supreme. What a great idea! After all, he's "just like us!"

Michael Collins asks, "What does he eat for breakfast?"

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Latest on David Olofson from his Mom and Dad.

David Olofson with his family on a prison visit.


From: David L Olofson
Subject: DRO'S CASE: NO, ALL GUN OWNERS
To:
Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 6:03 PM


10.12.09

To all of David’s friends and extended family,


It has been too long between updates. This is very difficult to write on the eve of pending news. The last news for the courts was like someone ripping a piece of our soul from us and we have not recovered. I truly hope and pray this time is not the same.

If I have forgotten someone, or email addresses have changed, I apologize, and please forward this to those who care and should care. But after sitting at the Fdl gun show this weekend, looking to distribute and disseminate information on David’s case, it was all too obvious that even to the gun enthusiasts and gun owners, the impact of David’s case is not recognized. This is sad. The laws on the books will make no difference if this verdict stands. I am afraid that this will give the government a blank check, and we will all pay the price.

I have attached the two briefs submitted to the US Supreme Court. The first submitted by William J. Olson, Attorneys at Law.

And can be found at their web site: http://www.lawandfreedom.com

We cannot thank enough the GOA’s support (http:www.gunowners.org), and to those who have contributed to the support effort, and the support and excellent work that Herb Titus and the attorney’s at William Olson’s have done.

If you go to www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/09-256.htm you can see the docket of David’s case. On Aug 28 the Petition for a writ was filed, the first attachment. As Herb put it, this was just the first step to get review on the merits and the court has complete discretion to say no to our petition. The Supreme Court has distributed David's Petition, on 09.16, to the justices and scheduled it to be considered at its conference on October 9. We were anticipating one or two friend-of-the- court briefs supporting the petition and was filed by September 30. This is the second attachment, an important amicus brief that was authored by Second Amendment attorneys David T. Hardy (http://armsand thelaw.com) and E. Stewart Rhodes (http:oathkeepers.org/oath/) for the Montana Shooting Sports Association and the Virginia Citizens Defense League. After filing, those briefs were distributed to the justices in time for them to review the briefs before the October 9 conference. These were just the first steps to get review on the merits. The court has complete discretion to say no to our petition. We cannot thank them enough for their support. Lord willing we will get the needed 4 votes out of the 9 justices. Look at the courts link above 10.13.

We are praying that 4 of the justices will show more common sense than those federal judges that have reviewed this case to date. David's petition will not be the only matter on the justices' October 9 agenda. With respect to David's Petition, the justices could make several decisions, the two most likely being: 1) Deny the petition; or 2) Request the Solicitor General to respond to the petition (thus far, the Solicitor General has waived the government's right to respond). If the justices request a response from the Solicitor General, the Court would set a time for that response, after which we would have an opportunity to reply. You can note from the docket the government’s response was due 09.30, although waived??. Anyone in the real business world would have been fired for showing such indiscretions as they have done throughout this case, and to the Supreme Court??? If it is denied, well it is all over and I’m afraid it is the beginning of the end for the freedom we now have in the possession multiple cartridge firearms. If they are to consider it we all need to pick up the phone and call everyone we know and have them call their government reps and tell them this is not acceptable!

To quote from the first petition: ‘David’s conviction, if left standing, threatens countless other law-abiding citizens with becoming “felons-by-chance” should their firearm malfunction while exercising their right to keep and bear arms secured by the Second Amendment. Only the detail and precision of a Staples definition of “automatically” can protect the constitutional right to own a semi-automatic against arbitrary government classification, leading to seizure, prosecution, incarceration, and a lifetime ban on firearm ownership’.

To quote from the second: ‘If a gun owner has a firearm that malfunctions there is no remedy or safe harbor. Even if corrected then gives it to his son or grandson, and it happens again, can he be prosecuted’? According to this verdict yes he can, we all can!! —as stated in this verdict: NO MATTER WHAT THE CAUSE!

For those who would like to put a face to this case, see the photo attached. This was from a visit to Sandstone we took one weekend. It includes his family; Candy, Sophia, David, Isabella, and Alex. David wanted us to share it with his friends.

Thank you all for your prayers and support.

Dave & Pat Olofson


And from the Spectral Eminence Grise of Sipsey Street, a question:

"So, tell me, what does that scabrous-hearted harridan Jody Keeku have for breakfast?"

Sunday, December 26, 2010

ATF to be cannibalized? From CleanUpATF.org, factual tidbits and speculations about destroying the agency to save the agenda.

Once upon a scandal, the BATF Air Force idea got sent to the boneyard. Now, maybe, it will be the entire agency. Don't celebrate, though, because if it is it will only be in furtherance of the anti-firearm Federale agenda.


Most of you, gentle readers, are familiar by now with the dissident ATF agent site known as CleanUpATF.org.

Here are some interesting discussions between ATF agents from that site, beginning with a link to this video about the terminal stupidity of banning certain Airsoft guns, and commentary upon it.



Just an observation by a former ATF agent:

Word on the street is another agency in DOJ is making sure this video is floating around Congress during the current budget discussions. And the rumor is they are currently considering taking away your firearms jurisdiction too after seeing this and are taking into account the fall-out after the recent ATF Gun Runner fiasco. All that hard, dangerous, dedicated work by ATF street agents targeting the most dangerous "worst of the worst" criminals over the years for the agency wasted.

(LINK TO VIDEO CLIP ABOVE)

Good job am sure he gave himself a big bonus this year.

Merry Christmas ATF


One agency using another agency's foibles to sandbag them in Congress? Say it ain't so, Herr Mueller. To which another agent, Noreaster, responded to moderator Doc Holliday:

Heard from some buddies over the last couple days that we are now in big trouble in the explosives field. Here is the basic story I heard: The federal Office of Management and Budget filed a report looking to cut out our explosives work and claims we just duplicate what the FBI does except for our regulatory work, and also said we should have our money taken away for NIBIN, state and local training and PCS moves. I also heard Chait sent a memo to the SACs in the last few days saying we need to start cutting NRT, SRT, travel, conferences, office supplies, cars, hiring, the new Glocks, and all state and local training.

Allegedly our huge new explosives building in Alabama has no money to operate and no people to run it, so Melson and Hoover are quietly looking to deal it away to the FBI or Homeland Security before we get caught in a scandal by the OIG or the media. Long time boot licker and Friend of Billy, Joe Riehl, the guy who for years been the point man in gutting our explosives jurisdiction, has been given marching orders to help cover up things in Alabama, was made acting chief of the facility and as a reward, he has been promised the new senior executive job in Quantico at TEDAC, and he has been heard in the halls of HQ telling people ATF "owes him" for doing the bidding of Chait, Boxler, Martin, Carter, Domenech, Hoover and Melson for years on explosives.

Martin thinks he is a real funny guy telling people in HQ that we can pay for explosives by turning the Alabama center into a bed and breakfast, or selling pies. It would not be so funny if Martin didn't have a record for selling us out and taking care of his classmates like Riehl.

Can anyone out there confirm any or all of this?


(MBV NOTE: I can.

The ATF National Explosives Training Center in Huntsville is one of the items I have had on my "dream list of Congressional oversight committee hearing subjects." Hadn't mentioned it because I didn't want to warn Holder, Traver and Company that it was in our cross-hairs, but since the CleanUp guys mention it. . .

Birmingham area ATF agents are quite well informed about this scandal ready to break and gossip about it frequently where little birdies flit from tree to tree. But, since it is now out on CleanUp, perhaps some enterprising reporter can begin digging. Not the long-since-tamed Birmingham News of course, whose crime reporter Carol Robinson used to be married to an ATF agent (or so I'm told) and who depends on friendly relations with the Feds for story tips, but perhaps CNN or FOX Atlanta? I can tell you that SOMEONE at some point will discover this story simply because it is so juicy. Film at Eleven.)


Later, Doc Holliday replied:

Its true.Our leaders don't think past their own immediate personal gain. They have mismanaged virtually every aspect and every directorate through Waste, Fraud and Abuse, Gross mismanagement with virtually no accountability. They have and continue to personally prosper while vital programs and public safety suffer. We have Congress' attention and will continue to press the media to challenge the illegal, unethical and corrupt practices that are happening right before our eyes. Hopefully it won't be too little, too late.


CPT Jonathan Tuttle comments:

My take:

When OMB, etc. gets its claws into what it regards as duplication of explosives by federal LE, somebody's budget (i.e., ATF's) WILL get cut in this environment as the Congress looks to reduce Government spending. What on Earth does anybody THINK will happen when the Congress finally moves on cutting budgets? We've got a Continuing Resolution until March 1st. That means all Federal agencies get to operate on the same funding level as last year, and no assurance that funds won't be cut for the REST of the fiscal year 2011.

Cling and die, ATF, because that's what's fixing to happen.

If won't be the FBI that takes the hit. It will be ATF. ATF has been leaderless for some 6 years now, and "Acting" or "Deputy" Directors don't get a full seat at the table because they command no juice. This is not peculiar to ATF --- it happens to ANY federal agency that is unfortunate enough not to have a permanent Director. ATF retains its hostility to the FBI, and the sentiment is fully returned --- quite the spectacle, and an embarrassing one that the Department of Justice will be glad to resolve.

ATF's "explosives" component is in more than mortal danger of being eliminated from that alone, and it is likely to be eased out of existence by (1) the blatant hostilities about turf, so far essentially unresolved, between ATF and the FBI, and (2) Congressional and Department of Justice OIG disgust over the failure of ATF and the FBI to work something out, in a mutually hostile "dance" that has been orchestrated on both sides for several years now. Even publishing a Justice OIG report didn't help. Oh well, cling and die.

It seems likely that Appropriations will refuse to fund the "explosives" component of ATF, which means that all those ATF personnel may eat shit and die --- because if positions are ELIMINATED, there's no appeal or recourse beyond whatever the usual severance arrangements are.

ATF management has brought this upon itself. It is the fault of management, MANAGEMENT, people who are paid lots of money to supposedly know better than to allow this stuff to get out of hand, but who have nothing better to do than pursue their own personal interests and bureaucratic games than to act in the best interests of the taxpayers and of the loyal street agents who are more than horrified at what they are watching, powerless to get MANAGEMENT to do anything about it. The ATF street agents can't in fairness be blamed --- they are the football team that gets sent out to do a job, and they do it, they are not by definition managers by any stretch of the imagination, NOR SHOULD THEY BE. Management owes them their backing and to watch their backs, and MANAGEMENT has utterly failed to do that. It is MANAGEMENT that has screwed this pooch. There is nobody else to blame.


But whatever will the Obamanoids do with ATF's functions if they do divide it in order to short-circuit investigation into the many looming scandals?

Later, CPT Jonathan Tuttle advised me:

Based on the attached article, it is fairly easy to trace the recent Federal Register notice to May 2010 and Obama's meeting with the Mexican President. ATF certainly knows better than to publish illegal regulations, and I don't think ATF is behind this --- the latest demon in the White House menangerie is one Cass Sunstein, Esq., a law professor who has been directing the boneheaded policies emitting therefrom. . .

From what I've been reading on CleanUpATF lately, the prospect of budget cuts there loom, if not a reorganization.

Consider the October 2009 audit report by the Department of Justice Inspector General (see http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/plus/a1001.pdf) about the horrific situation with explosives jurisdiction. It won't take much for OMB to chop ATF out of that chunk of pie. It wouldn't take much to put Alcohol back at Treasury where it belongs, and Tobacco to FDA given the fact that tobacco is a drug. I think there are two possibilities for Firearms: (1) the Department of Homeland Security, given the domestic focus, or (2) (REDACTED'S) take, which is to Customs & Border Protection (CBP) because of the importation and ITAR aspects. I am less certain about that.


So, breaking up ATF preemptively allows the Obamanoids to duck responsibility for the scandals by saying, "See, we've cleaned it up by getting rid of the offending agency." Heck, they will even try to claim credit for it as a "cost-cutting" measure.

Doing so will also assign the agents and the mission to DHS, where Big Sis has always wanted more bully boys to put on the street. Just peachy. A win-win for the Federal Leviathan, making future misadventures more likely, and hence, civil war a certainty.

Therefore, when they tell you ATF is no more, don't celebrate and don't relax.

Rather, increase your vigilance and preparations.

For Leviathan -- having learned no lessons at all and with its appetite for our liberty and property undiminished -- will still be advancing, flying a different battle flag perhaps, but advancing nonetheless.

Mike
III

Thursday, May 1, 2014

"There is no teacher but the enemy." The Bundy Ranch Federally-Sponsored Cluster Coitus: Oath Keepers makes their case. My experiences and thoughts.

"There is no teacher but the enemy. No one but the enemy will ever tell you what the enemy is going to do. No one but the enemy will ever teach you how to destroy and conquer. Only the enemy shows you where you are weak. Only the enemy tells you when he is strong. And the rules of the game are what you can do to him and what you can stop him from doing to you." -- Mazer Rackham to Ender Wiggin in Ender's Game.
Oath Keepers makes their case of their actions and reactions at the Bundy Ranch in this video. It is necessarily long, reflecting as it does the testimony of five participants and a discussion of how they came to the decisions that they did. That said, it is worth watching all the way through. Please do that now and then return for my comments.
I have spoken with several independent militia commanders who spent time at the Bundy Siege, a couple of Three Percenters who were there from day one, and other Threepers and Oath Keepers who came later (none of whom are in the video). In addition, of course, I have my own experiences with -- and up-close observations of -- the personalities involved. These form the basis of my analysis below.
First, it is necessary to describe how I came to be there and what my relationship with Oath Keepers was and is. As readers know, the way that I came to be at the Bundy Ranch to give a speech on 19 April was strictly coincidental. The Buckeyes, you may recall, decided to dispense with my services without telling me and I was ejected from their meeting. When Stewart Rhodes found out I was available, he asked if I would be willing to come out and speak at the Bundy Ranch. I do not ask for anything for my speeches themselves, merely content with being provided with transportation to and from and provisions for a hotel room or a place to crash in a private home so that I can get a shower, dress the wound on my back in a semi-sterile environment and sleep in a comfortable chair (I have difficulty sleeping laying down since the rerouting of my digestive system). That's it. Generally I do not even ask for a rental car, content to depend upon catching rides with members of the host organization. Sometimes folks pick up the tab for my meals, sometimes not. Stewart agreed to these terms and paid for the economy tickets necessary to fly out to Las Vegas where he and Steve Homan picked me up at the airport for the ride out to the Bundy Ranch.
Further, it is important to remember that I am not a member of Oath Keepers, although I have always believed that their work reminding folks of the ramifications of the oath they took to be among the most important of tasks. There are Three Percenters who belong to Oath Keepers and Oath Keepers who are Three Percenters. That is a given. But I decided from the first that it was inappropriate of me to join the organization, having staked out a different area of operations as it were in the fight to defend the Founders' Republic.
It is also important to recall that Stewart Rhodes, the Oath Keepers board and I have not always seen eye to eye on some things. You may recall that OK at first committed to support, and then pulled out of, the armed march in Northern Virginia back in 2010. At the time there were those who wanted me to -- no, URGED me to -- loudly denounce Oath Keepers in general and Stewart Rhodes in particular for that decision. I did not not do so. I have long had a policy, dating from my work with the constitutional militia in the 90s, that I do not shoot my own side's wounded. I'm glad I had that policy, for Stewart Rhodes has come a long way since those days as a leader and the Oath Keepers are a valuable force in the fight for liberty. Those who accused Stewart then of being a coward did not see him later risk arrest last year at the hands of the Lexington, MA, police force when he refused their order to stay off the green and told them they would have to arrest him to stop him from administering the oath ceremony there. The Lexington PD, gritted their teeth and blinked, allowing the ceremony to go forward. That was entirely Stewart's doing. No, in my experience, Stewart Rhodes is no coward.
That said, Stewart stiffed me that first night at Bundy's, since we drove directly to the camp so that he could relieve some of his guys on outpost duty, despite his own lack of sleep. I got what rest I could in the car. Where Steve Homan -- the Vietnam vet in the OK video with the heart condition and an NVA bullet still lodged in his abdomen -- slept I have no idea, undoubtedly on the ground where he had no business being. Okay, I thought, improvise, adapt and overcome, although I was convinced then and remain convinced throughout my experiences there that neither Stewart, nor Steve Homan, nor Jerry, nor any of Jerry's command structure was getting enough sleep in order to make the best decisions. Tired commanders screw up. They should learn to delegate the routine stuff to subordinates even though it seems selfish, for it is a false economy to spare your troops some lost hours of their own sleep only to put them in harm's way because you lack sleep yourself. Indeed, I spent much of my time with those men urging them to get more sleep. As near as I could determine, they ignored me, which undoubtedly played a part -- a big part -- in what happened subsequently.
Given that US warfighters suffer from chronic sleep deprivation, they will almost certainly experience deleterious effects on performance. The most egregious example of the consequences of chronic and acute sleep debt is when combat troops fall asleep when they need to be vigilant. While less obvious, other effects of chronic and acute sleep debt such as microsleeps, lapses in attention, memory and judgment, alterations in mood, and degraded decision-making also have far-reaching consequences for combat effectiveness. Military leaders would never send troops into harm’s way without the safety afforded them by armor and other personal protective equipment; yet sending troops on missions when they are sleep deprived is equally as dangerous to themselves and to others in their organization. -- The Role of Sleep in the Military: Implications for Training and Operational Effectiveness by Nita Lewis Miller, et. al., Pg. 42.
It is important to remember that while OK did retain hotel rooms at a cheap casino -- the Virgin River -- in nearby Mesquite (including one room I shared with Steve Homan), they used the rooms mostly for giving their own members on the line a place to crash, refit and then go back into security role, not for the leadership to enjoy comfort while the membership slept in the dirt. This BS about Stewart and Co, "staying at the casino and gambling away 20K of the member's money," was to my experience a flat lie. In my time there, Stewart and the OKs were too damn busy to play the slots and I never observed any of them in the gambling area. As for me, my Grandpa Nace taught me that "gambling was a tax on the stupid," and I have never been one to waste my fragile and thin resources on a sure bet to nowhere. It would have irked me greatly if I had observed such conduct on the part of Oath Keepers. I did not. The few times I had meals with Oath Keepers at the Casino, they ate modestly and mostly paid for their own. I know I did, most often having breakfast at McDonald's across the street (I also kicked in $20.00 on a big bag of Egg McMuffins for the troops, which I dropped off to Jerry).
For those having trouble visualizing the layout, there were three layers of security at the Bundy Ranch and one layer of insecurity. The first, and outermost, was the "scouts out" operation run by the Oath Keepers that kept track of movement on the roads and back trails leading up to the Bundy property. The second was the main camp posted above the side road leading to the Bundy Ranch, and the shed on the road below that served as the chow hall. Here, eventually, Jerry commanded a mixed and constantly changing force of Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, and the best of the militia formations. The last was the Bundy Ranch security detail itself, hired by the Bundys and providing, at least in the beginning, the liason between the other formations and the Bundys.
Between the "scouts out" of the Oath Keepers and the camp containing Jerry's CP was the "lower camp" (actually the first militia presence that the press and public saw) of what was dubbed "The Fruits and Nuts Brigade." These were people who were not trusted by the other more competent formations, or did not themselves trust the other formations. These people were, in the main, excitable, prickly and resentful -- and ever ready to talk to the press. There was literally nothing the other formations could do about, or with, them, so they pretty much did a great job of representing the worst face of the Bundy defense operation and the militia to the press. They were often the source of unfounded rumors and dangerous weapon handling. One night they almost started the next American civil war by getting spooked by the arrival of six Las Vegas metro cars traveling in fast convoy down the public road that led to the Bundys. Some of them arranged themselves in a hasty ambush and were only persuaded not to fire first by the intervention of cooler heads who were staying down there. Like I said, "Fruits and Nuts" -- and a constant source of trouble.
Which highlights a principal cause of the chaos and confusion throughout the events that I witnessed. This was a come-as-you-are party, with volunteers flooding in from all over the country. I am quite sure that the Bundys were both gratified by the turnout and frightened by the character of some of those who did show up. This probably caused the arrangement that developed, with separate formations, different commanders with different styles of command (or no style of, or ability to, command), who had difficulty communicating with each other and with no shared SOP or rules of engagement other than to "protect the Bundys" -- an admirable if nebulous and constantly shifting target subject to the whims and agendas of individual "commanders," some of whom commanded nothing but themselves and their own egos. That the Oath Keepers donated $12.5K to the Bundys to help them defray expenses says much about the generosity of Stewart and his people. That the Bundys later embraced a person that anyone with any experience could tell was a sociopath and provocateur is to me inexplicable. (I was told that Ryan is attending LDS meetings now with the Bundys. Whether that bit of chameleon trickery plays into their decisions is anybody's guess.)
From the first there was thievery in "Jerry's camp." A $900 Ipad belonging to a media guy hired by the Oath Keepers came up missing. One militia leader I talked to said that they lost nothing because they always maintained a constant guard over their stuff. Heck, somebody even stole my official Knob Creek coffee cup, so I am not surprised that when faced with the temptation of sophisticated electronics that Oath Keepers loaned to "Jerry's Kids" that some came up missing.
At this date, Jerry (and especially his conduct since the failed coup attempt by Ryan Payne --if that is his real name), remains a puzzle to me. An impressive former Marine NCO, he had a real command presence, the absolute loyalty of those who came into contact with him and, like most NCOs, an absolute inability to delegate responsibility and tasks. I include Stewart Rhodes in that critique as well. Both men took on too much themselves, got little to no sleep and made bad decisions as a result.
Example: One afternoon a couple showed up at the camp: a young tattooed white male wearing a holstered pistol and his girlfriend toting a shotgun. In the entrance interviews, which Jerry insisted upon mostly conducting himself, it developed that the guy was an admitted felon, but he didn't believe that it was constitutional to deny him his firearm rights. This came with a long, sad story about how they had quit their jobs to volunteer for the Bundys and do their part. Both Jerry and Stewart were inclined to accept their help until I called them over and explained the ramifications of accepting a self-admitted, armed felon into camp. They were impressed by the man's "honesty and sincerity," in admitting up-front that he was a felon. I said, among other things, that of course he admitted it. If he hadn't, then they would have plausible deniability when later confronted about it. By stating it up front, it was actually worse for them because they could not later deny having known that fact.* "How do you think that is going to sound in the grand jury?" I asked them. They changed their minds and sent the couple on their way with gas money. I am convinced that neither man would have needed any assistance from me to take that decision had they been in their right minds. That is, if they had been even semi-rested and on the bounce, which commanders must be to the best of their ability if they are to carry out their solemn duty to do their best to take care of their people and execute the mission.
*NOTE: Throughout my stay at Bunkerville I gave a lot of advice to men and women for whom this was their first rodeo. Among the most often repeated (second, I think only behind my constant harping to get more sleep) was the old Marine intelligence officer's dictum when dealing with sources -- "Why is this SOB telling me this, and why is he telling me this NOW?"
As an aside, weapons handling in Jerry's camp was terrible and I observed numerous unsafe practices about muzzle discipline with loaded rifles. It was a wonder that no one was killed or injured by a negligent discharge during my stay. As they say, if I may paraphrase, God takes care of drunks, little children and the American militia. I counseled some of these safety scofflaws personally and privately. Eventually I gave it up as wasted effort and just tried to stay out of the line of potential fire. The sight of a newbie clerk sitting at the check-in table in the CP wearing a loaded FAL on a sling in front of his body muzzle-up while he filled out new arrival cards was as comical as it was appalling. That this was apparently with the tacit approval of Jerry, whose life was also endangered thereby, can only be excused by extreme sleep deprivation, which as I have mentioned is itself a command failure.
But this business of allying with the same guy -- a likely federal provocateur -- who tried to displace you at your job, and lying by omission and commission about Oath Keepers and the whole drone strike business at a joint presser with the same moke who stuck several knives in your back is inexplicable to me. One of the ploys of a sociopath or a provocateur is to shrink your perceived universe and get you reacting to him and his artificial constructs without reference to outside reality. At such moments you have to be able to have the presence of mind to step back out of the box that he has created for you so you can see the whole picture. It is evident to me that Ryan Payne (or whatever his real name is) is an expert at that trick. On my last day, the moke tried provoking me and I finally blew him off with the comment, "Well, like Grandpa Vanderboegh said, 'Don't try to to teach your Grandma how to suck eggs." He thought I was joking and broke off the engagement. I wasn't joking. This ain't my first rodeo and I ran into pukes like him all the time in the 90s. I am convinced that if there had been more Bob Wrights at the event and fewer wide-eyed newbies a lot of this debacle would not have happened.
Unfortunately Bob wasn't able to get away from some serious work commitments to be there. A Bob Wright anecdote to illustrate my point: In 2005 when Bob became what amounted to operations officer for the Minutemen in one of their first border vigils, he discovered that in the bible college they were using as a dorm for volunteers that some idiots had taken the mattresses from the beds and blocked the windows with them "because the Feds are going to come in the night and throw grenades in the windows." What Bob is reported to have said is not for delicate ears and the Minutemen volunteer roster was short a half-dozen idiots come the next dawn, but Bob did not, does not, EVER suffer fools gladly. We needed some hard heads and harder hearts like his at Bundy's Ranch. Nothing illustrates this more than the reaction to the drone strike.
Now, after talking to all the major participants in the Oath Keeper chain of decision and command regarding that remarkable and skillfully delivered piece of federal disinformation as well as some outside witnesses who were there when this came down, I am inclined to believe the Oath Keeper version of events as presented in the above video. Their failure was not one of cowardice as has been alleged. Stewart was sincerely motivated, I believe, by a concern for his troops, the Bundys and the innocents in the camps. The failure was one of lack of hard-headed analysis and an equal lack of hard-hearted decision taking.
When I was told that Oath Keepers was actually reacting to such an obvious piece of federal disinformation, I exploded on the phone. The guy I was talking to said that yes, they had initially thought that it was disinformation but they had it confirmed from multiple sources (as Stewart explained in the video), one of whom "was in the Governor's office" who had given them several smaller tips earlier that had all proven to be true. Of course it came from from the Governor's office, I blew up, for only if it came from an absolutely impeccable source would you believe it. The use of a drone strike on American soil would cause such an outcry that even Obama would be impeached within a week. Did they think that such calculating bastards were really that stupid? Besides, let us assume for the purposes of argument that the information was true. If the enemy is willing to make such a fatal mistake, it is our duty not to get in the way of it. Sure, they kill the folks on the scene, I argued, but their entire regime would be swept away. Isn't that our larger purpose? Indeed, I pointed out then and in subsequent conversations with others, our JOB is to fight and if need be to die interposing ourselves between the tyrants and the people. If someone is doing this and is unwilling to make that trade he should find another avocation. With the video explanation, I am mindful that Stewart was motivated by the highest concern for innocents and did not advocate the precipitate pullout as has been claimed by his federal enemies (Ryan Payne) and his erstwhile friends (Jerry). But the public reaction to inform the media (which we now know Jerry agreed to) was stupid. The smart thing to do was to make the adjustments that Stewart and Jerry did initially and then to sit down in the CP, drink coffee, "smoke 'em if you got 'em" and await events. If it was disinformation we win points for being smarter than the Feds think we are and if it wasn't disinformation we REALLY win.
The subsequent chaos and lack of discipline, including the wanton and unprovoked assault on a Vietnam Vet with a heart condition, is on Jerry's shoulders. That little out-of-control thug of his damn near killed a good man, a hero in my eyes, who because of his health had no business being there yet was because he saw it as his simple duty. I took the measure of the man named Steve Homan during my stay there and I say without fear of contradiction that there is no finer American. Lord knows how much the stress of the whole experience took off his life.
My final conclusion is that if Oath Keepers is guilty of anything it is that they were too trusting, too helpful and too eager to make peace with people who obviously had their own agendas, some simple thievery and others in service to their federal masters.
The key is, will they survive and learn from the experience. In conversations with Stewart and other board members, I have learned that they will be after-actioning this cruel lesson taught by the enemy -- and by people they thought were their friends. They will be developing rules of engagement and an SOP for future Bundy Ranches, and there WILL be future Bundy Ranches.
Lesson One: Get some things in writing up front from the folks you intend to protect, establishing a clear-cut chain of command and authority for the various spheres of action. Don't charge in without some vital issues clearly understood by all parties.
Another lesson: maintain control of your supplies. People donated good money to put them in your hands and you have a fiduciary duty to them to spend them wisely and to prevent their theft by people with other agendas.
Another lesson: Have a system of working with and integrating individuals and small units into larger ones, of vetting out the fruits and nuts and provocateurs and sending them on their way.
Another lesson: The Feds won back all the ground they lost by their direct attack on the Bundys with an indirect campaign of subversion and disinformation. If they destroy the Oath Keepers along with the Bundys' defensive arrangements it will be a huge win-win for them. They probably won't make the first mistake again, except with truly low-hanging fruit. They WILL repeat the other successful strategy. We need to be wise when dealing with disinformation and just as determined in our ability to physically interpose ourselves between the iron fist of tyrannical government and their intended victims, even if that means our lives.
There are many other lessons. The enemy has taught them to us at a great price at the Bundy Siege. The only question is can we be smart enough, self-critical enough, honest enough, to grasp them and to refuse to make such mistakes in the future. This is a long war, an eternal war really. The domestic enemies of the Constitution and the Founders' Republic will be there until we defeat them -- or we are ourselves defeated by our own failures to learn the lessons that they teach us.