Thursday, June 13, 2013

Good for thee but not for me?

Jeff Duncan questions IRS rifle usage

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

So exactly when did the IRS become approved as an armed Federal agency? What Congressional bill gave authorization to allow this.Same with the Dept Of Indoctrination. They have been buying shotguns for what? Again they are not an armed Federal agency. More agencies have become armed without permission of Congress under this Regime then all others put together.

William Flatt said...

The IRS has shotguns, and machine guns too, no doubt "to serve you better". They also train with those 'average citizen' targets that the DHS has been using as of late.

This agency, like the BATF, needs to be abolished; its employees deported, and its leaders tried for treason.

Anonymous said...

A piquant irony in this "armed" revelation. An agency, already "armed" with an overmastering array of regulatory and legal "weapons" sufficient to reduce just about anyone to abject poverty and incarceration now reportedly needs "assault rifles" to further terrorize taxpayers ?

Jack-Booted Thugs" indeed !! >Jeff

Anonymous said...

Let 'em go ahead and train with a 300 meter rifle. But it'll be a 500 meter war.

Peter said...

This is a goodness thing. Let the IRS be armed to the teeth. Let them hire ATF rejects and cops with violence issues.

The IRS is to Joe SixPack what the ATF is to us, and someone who will take a bullet rather than shoot a Fibbie will blow away an IRS agent without hesitation.