Sipsey Street Irregulars: "Crooks and Liars" caught lying again. What else is new?

Sunday, April 11, 2010

"Crooks and Liars" caught lying again. What else is new?

An email to David Neiwert, the liar-in-chief of "Crooks and Liars."

-----Original Message-----
From: georgemason1776@aol.com
To: dneiwert@hotmail.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 6:59 am
Subject: From Mike Vanderboegh: Hey! Asshole! You want to correct a bald-faced lie on your website?

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/libertarian-who-urged-patriots-break-0

"So the Washington Post interviews this Tea Party leader and former militiaman, the one who urged people to break Democratic party office windows, as if he were just someone with another reasonable point of view that's not worth examining."

Also repeated here.

http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2010/04/09/anti-government-radicalism-discourages-essential-regulations/

I am not a member of any Tea Party, never have been, ergo, I cannot be truthfully described as a "Tea Party leader." Not that the truth has any meaning for you congenitally lying collectivist pantywaists.

Mike Vanderboegh

3 comments:

Mike said...: What's the deal with the disability? Don't these asswipes realize that you paid for it, forcibly, that Obama's not just writing checks for you out of the goodness of his heart? I too am on disibility after paying into the system for over 30 years and will probably never get back the money I paid into it. Most people would be better off without government disability and investing into a private plan, if we had a choice.; April 11, 2010 at 9:17 AM
pdxr13 said...: AFAICT, there are no leaders, membership cards, lists, rosters, dues, etc. that would qualify the Tea Party as anything but a bunch of individuals. Calling them a "flash mob" would be as close to accurate as I could find.

Folks can "self-identify" as "members" of a Tea Party Gathering, but it's WAY DIFFERENT from a group like Oath Keepers or your local Eagles Airie/Elks Lodge. The media calls people "Tea Partiers" or TB-ers (depending on the agenda of the station or commentator) usually as an accusation more than a meaningful description.

Cheers.; April 11, 2010 at 1:37 PM
Anonymous said...: What amazes me is that these media whores who call themselves writers are generally know-nothing children - twenty-to-thirty-something bimbettes with liberal arts college degrees in what is laughably called "journalism". Heck, most of the time they can't even spell correctly, much less put a grammatically correct sentence together. They seem to have never had a bad day in their pitiful little lives, and think they know something of reality (or any other subject you care to name) just because their leftist college professors told them so.

They OBVIOUSLY have absolutely NO idea of what is said in the Constitution, or what the words actually MEAN, much less what the words in all the administrative policies and procedures Congress passes (sight unseen) really mean. They haven't a clue as to what lengths the corporate D.C. has gone to rob this country blind, enslaving us all in the process, just to pay off the 90 year old debt to the Fed. If they did, and had any common sense, or at least a modicum of morality and responsibility, then THEY would not only be supporting what is said here, but probably be out breaking windows themselves!

The socialist school-induced ignorance of these kids is just unbelievable.

-JRM
III; April 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Sunday, April 11, 2010

"Crooks and Liars" caught lying again. What else is new?

3 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers