data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ee7a/0ee7aede7253a8b78f6b9d1f109f039be11e35af" alt=""
From Irregular Michael I. we have this image of his Dad:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f077/0f077bb505c312002891af5ffc116cecc54097fd" alt=""
He writes:
When I saw the picture of the M1919, I recognized it right away. Here's a picture of my dad, Jerry Inman, in Okinawa, I believe around 1959-1960 or so, with one. My only experience with the USMC as a navy corpsman was several years with a tank battalion so I'm not sure about the MOS. I do remember him saying at one time he was a machine gunner, if that's even an MOS.
Keep up the good work.
Now, I have been taken to task for identifying the M1919 pulled from the north Alabama creek as an M1919A6 rather than an M1919A4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/065ce/065ceb6d9170ab211e428d01cfa2d6d5f6cfc016" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1438/e143831258620df3a9bc08c93962558a89636f78" alt=""
Another version of the M1919A4, the M1919A6, was an attempt to make the weapon into a light machine gun by attaching a buttstock and lighter barrel — 4 lb instead of 7 lb. The A6 version was in fact heavier than the A4 without its tripod, at 32 lb, though its bipod made for faster deployment and enabled the machine gun team to dispense with one man (the tripod bearer). The A6 version saw increasing service in the latter days of World War II and was used extensively in Korea. The A6 variant had a folding bipod mounted on the front of the gun, a sheet-metal buttstock, carrying handle, and a tapered barrel. While the modifications were intended to make the weapon more useful as a squad light machine gun, it was a stopgap solution, as the M1919A6 was heavier than the old Lewis gun of World War I, let alone the contemporary light machine guns of other nations.
The information below comes principally from BrowningMGs.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04225/04225978f71b8ef0052422d4250125f5647196d4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0f8a/b0f8acd228126d04c9750ca4560e8af45bdbab07" alt=""
Now, an M1919 that started life as an A4 can be converted to an A6 by replacing the barrel, barrel jacket, barrel bearing, booster, booster lock, bipod assembly, butt stock with clamp, carry handle, and top cover latch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c332/6c332215e09c67363f1b8923dde5be8fe8d025c7" alt=""
However, I told you all that arcana to tell you this:
Whether it is an A4 or an A6 depends entirely on the barrel. An A6 can be stripped of its carry handle, buttstock and bipod, have a pintle and a traverse and elevation mechanism added on (just like in the photo of the one recovered and look like an A4 yet still be an A6. Curiously, the flash hider/cone seems to be neither an M6 (for the A4) nor a M7 (for the A6). I asked a machine gunner buddy of mine and he thinks the flash hider might be Israeli.
His answer to the question, "Is it an A4 or A6?" was "Yes." "You're right about the barrel being the distinguishing characteristic but there's not enough information in the photo to tell." He concluded, "Well, I CAN tell you it is an M1919."
So now you know. Or not.
Mike
III
3 comments:
Machine gunner is MOS: 0331 in the USMC.
Florida Cracker
(and old Marine)
Sounds right to me, having been a long time admirer of John Brownings genius in firearms. It is my understanding that the A6 was upgraded (if you can call it that) to use as a portable MG with butt stock and bipod. The muzzle device is something that I am not familiar with .... looks like an old flash device from the M1D or maybe a M2 Carbine. I think the British used one like that on their Enfield Jungle Carbine 303.
Interesting that someone would dress this gun up and then throw it away though. Of course I know that we sent boatloads of arms to the Israelis over the years. They always used our weapons with a smattering of anything they could get. They are known for modifying existing systems to suit their needs in the early years. This would make me ask the question ... "how did a Israeli modified MG end up in a creek in Alabama"?
Just a thought.
The problem with your analysis - from what I can see - is the tripod pintle or peg at the front/bottom of the receiver. Somehow I can't see that being part of an A6.
It also seems to me that the muzzle attachment is distorted by being much closer to the camera - and thus appearing much larger in the pic. Add in some missing bits from corrosion, and...
All in all, I'd bet it was an A4 with some bubba-style additions.
Still, it would sure be interesting to know the true history of this sad relic...
DD
Post a Comment