Saturday, April 3, 2010

MOWCA continues to (apparently deliberately) miss the point.


What these (count to ten before you choose your words) uh, people, claim is my "strategy" is actually merely a tactic, a tool. They say we're "out of time." How do they know THAT? And whose clock are they watching? The enemy plays both a short and a long game, so should we.

I'm in a bar fight and I use any chair. What then would these ideological purists do? Indeed, what HAVE they done? The question is rhetorical, for I am not going to waste time refuting them now. Maybe after 19 April (Absolved has to be finished and submitted before I leave for Washington). Anybody else want to give it a whirl?

Mike
III

"Unimpressed: A young girl looks bored as Mr Obama greets adoring fans at a big rally in Portland, Maine ."

"I don't know what they're happy about. These old people have already stolen my future. . . And that's BEFORE the civil war this schmuck is starting."

Glynn Wilson's very small penis.



Thanks to David Codrea for forwarding this chart of Glynn Wilson's MONTHLY traffic. As David says, "So much for being 'a serious alternative' to the Drudge Report..."

Seen in the harsh light of these pitiful numbers, one can understand how Wilson's lying attack on me is just desperate ploy for more hits. In Web terms, this man has a very small penis.

COL Robert "Mad Bob" REDACTED, commanding officer of the Dogtown Rangers and a native of Blount County, Alabama, is personally offended by Wilson's attack. "Ah never heard of the little prick," he said, "but Ah'm gonna find out." Mad Bob promises that Wilson will become a subject of special study for his S-2, CPT R.A. Bear, as soon as Bear returns from his current scout of Northern Virginia. If Wilson hasn't issued a retraction by then and I go to the bother of writing a piece on the little socialist dick, you can bet I'LL get my footnotes correct.

Mike
III



LATER: I sent this post to Wilson with this comment:

-----Original Message-----
From: georgemason1776@aol.com
To: fast2write@charter.net
Sent: Sat, Apr 3, 2010 7:21 am
Subject: My latest post: "Glynn Wilson's very small penis."

Got a lawyer yet? And how are you going sell any of your lies to larger publications anymore without correcting those you've already told? Seems you are well on the way to burning any reputation you have in a Buddhist monk sort of way. Keep it up. Or correct your story. Your choice.

Mike Vanderboegh

Friday, April 2, 2010

The Window War makes Global Guerrillas.

Way cool.

Window War continues, this time a stupid congresscritter's SUV window.

''I don't worry about the constitution on this to be honest.''

"What do you mean when you say, 'No more free Katrinas?'"

THIS is what I mean.

Thanks to Irregular Dale for forwarding the link.

MOWCA misses the point.

Big time.

This commenter at David Codrea's site mostly gets it:

Kevin Wilmeth said...

Points taken. Hell, I've got things to disagree with MBV on as well, and I fervently hope that some day I get the chance to set the man right on a couple of things. :-)

However, although I do agree with the point of the MOWCA post (c'mon...how else did we get to this sorry pass in the first place?), I think it misses the point that I got from MBV's "call".

For some time now Mike has been alluding to Threepers "being everywhere" by various means, and this latest idea is in no way different than his advocacy for, say, Oath Keepers. It seems overly simplistic, and not a little insulting, to suggest that Mike has suddenly become so afraid of consequences that he would advocate surrender in the form of assimilation. That's a cheap shot.

I certainly know that if I were in the middle of a personal cold war with the likes of the Federal apparatus that really would like MBV to succumb to his congestive heart failure, I would want to employ as many psychological tactics as I could--especially if I were still trying to avoid bloodshed. That is just exactly how the "we are everywhere" concept strikes me.

I assure you that if I ever detect a substantive compromise of principle in Mike's actions, I will be the first to simply walk away. But this ain't it. MBV has earned at least the right to a fair assessment, and I daresay he's done a hell of a lot more that's needed doing than any of his detractors.


As does Jon at the original post, who says in part:

i fail to see how taking a government job and then intentionally partaking of many small acts of subordination to hinder or prevent said employer from completing its unconstitutional and unlawful mission is accepting what i understand to be invisible and intangible chains. you would be literally getting paid in an increasingly worthless currency for the sole purpose of opposing, preventing, and perhaps non-violently overthrowing that very system, as well as converting it into firearms, ammunition, and other such stores of value as a fail-safe mechanism.

More left-collectivist lying slime. (But I may get a chance to sue this one.)


Meet Glynn Wilson (tiny head in proportion with brain).

Glynn Wilson claims to be:

a reporter, writer and photographer for almost 30 years. He spent nine years in academe. For the past 12 years he has experimented with publishing on the Web Press and pioneered in the field of Independent online journalism. His primary goal is to continue the fight to keep the Internet free of taxes and regulations and keep giant corporations from destroying the potential for the democratizing influence of the Net to spread far and wide. Glynn Wilson’s Specialties: Covering politics, science, health, nature and the environment. As a photographer, I specialize in wildlife, especially birds.


He SAYS his work has "has appeared in The Nation magazine, The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, and other publications. He is the editor and founder of The Locust Fork News-Journal at LocustFork.Net."

I say "says" because the man is a demonstrable liar and not particularly in touch with reality or the truth. For evidence, I offer this screed which I will rebut ad seriatim as we go along.


Living in a Land of Rising Right-Wing Hate

Thursday 01 April 2010

by: Glynn Wilson, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Northeast Jefferson County east of Birmingham, Alabama, has long been known as a white-flight suburb and home to a crowd of racist rednecks, mostly good old boys and gals who work for the power company, the gas company, the phone company and in construction. Bordered by rural and mostly white Blount and St. Clair counties to the north and east, it has become the poor side of town. The money went south. The black migration from the city has in recent years about taken over what was at one time the largest, mostly white suburb in the country called Center Point, which was the halfway point between the industrial city of Birmingham and the countryside in the 1950's and 1960's.

Now that the citizens of the United States have elected the first African-American president in US history, however, there are racist, conservative activist groups popping up all over the place - and not just the Tea Party. One man has put his area on the map like no other.

Michael B. Vanderboegh of Pinson, Alabama, hit the national spotlight last week and is now under serious federal law enforcement scrutiny since calling for right-wing militia-style activists to toss bricks through the windows of Democrats on his SipseyStreetIrregulars blog, designed to appeal to the so-called Three Percenters, or three percent of American gun owners with the most radical view of the Second Amendment.

Vanderboegh may have been able to continue blogging in relative suburban obscurity, except that somebody decided to carry out his call to throw bricks in New York, Arizona and Kansas. One brick that crashed through the window of the Democratic Committee headquarters in Monroe County, New York, had a note attached with a quote from Barry Goldwater: "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice."

"I guess that guy's one of ours," Vanderboegh said in a telephone interview with a Montgomery newspaper. "Glad to know people read my blog."

Another brick slammed through the glass doors at the Democratic Committee's office in Rochester, New York, and another was thrown at the window of Rep. Louise Slaughter's district office in Niagara Falls.

MBV: Wilson, if he was at all sentient, would know that Slaughter's office window was broken BEFORE I issued my call.


Reports of brick-throwing at Democratic offices were also reported last Monday in Arizona and Kansas.

Thanks in part to a new Southern Poverty Law Center report on the Rage of the Right, the guy's story, such as it is, has been repeated in The Washington Post, not once but twice, and MSNBC on National Public Radio and in hundreds of newspapers, thanks to the AP wire.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center's intelligence report on Vanderboegh, he has tried to portray himself as a moderate, first in the militia world and more recently in the anti-immigration movement.

"But he hasn't always sounded that way," according to the report. Back in the mid-1990's, he wrote a document entitled "Strategy and Tactics for a Militia Civil War," in which he discussed the utility of snipers using "violence carefully targeted and clearly defensive: war criminals, secret policemen, rats …"

MBV: An out of context but accurate quote. This guy has obviously not read Prof. Churchill's book, To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face.


As of November 1, the tiny group of Three Percenters gave itself another name - the Alabama Minuteman Surveillance Team - and the mission of making life miserable for any business that hires undocumented workers.

MBV: The moron left out the year, 2005.


"We hereby put exploitative employers and crooked politicians on notice," Vanderboegh declared after ending the patrols and deciding to return to Alabama to concentrate on the situation there. "We intend to make it toxic for anyone doing public or private business to use illegals. If I were a politician in Alabama right now, I'd start getting REAL careful about who I accepted money from. Because we're fixin' to flip on the light switch."

Vanderboegh denied any suggestion of vigilantism, telling a Birmingham newspaper that all his group sought was enforcement of existing laws. He had similarly shrugged off criticism of the para-militarism of the militias back when he was associated with groups including the Alabama Constitutional Militia, the Tri-States Militia and the 1st Alabama Cavalry Regiment of the so-called Constitutional Militia.

MBV: I was never associated with the Alabama Constitutional Militia organization. That was John Hassey's bunch.


Take note that was during the Clinton years. He seems to only have a problem with Democrats, not Republicans, an indication that his so-called "revolution" is not exactly as nonpartisan as he tries to claim.

On his blog and in other documents on the Web traced to him, Vanderboegh talks about President Barack Obama as a "tyrant," but he uttered not one word of criticism against President George W. Bush while his administration dismantled the Fourth Amendment against illegal searches and seizures by authorizing illegal spying on every American's email, Web browsing habits and phone calls.

MBV: This is total bullshit as anyone who has read my stuff recalls. I denounced Bush in the most vigorous terms for the PATRIOT Act and his failure to protect our borders while growing government exponentially. Indeed, as this collectivist putz would know if he had done ANY careful research about the Window War, my first short story dealing with the subject was prompted by Dubya's embracing of the misnamed "Gun Show Loophole" bill. The fact is that the story presented the breaking of the windows of BOTH political parties as a desired tactic. I am not a GOP party member. Not that facts seem to mean anything to this lying moke.


Now that policy is about to trap Vanderboegh in a legal juggernaut, and he may get the chance he seeks to get arrested for the cause to tell his story to a larger audience. He openly seeks publicity on his site and writes that he fully expects to be arrested.

A spokesperson for US Attorney Joyce Vance's office in Birmingham said it would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing investigation. The chief deputy for Jefferson County is referring all press calls to the public relations agent for the local office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which has so far refused to return phone calls after interviewing Vanderboegh Tuesday.

While Vanderboegh tells TV reporters he's not a racist, a Google background search on Michael B. Vanderboegh shows he recently purchased this book from Amazon.com: "White Rage: The Extreme Right and American Politics," by Martin Durham.

MBV: This is a damned lie. I have never purchased anything from Amazon.com. I do not have a credit card and haven't had for years. I do not have a PayPal account. I do not own this book. I have never read this book. I did not order this book. A damned lie.


This week, Vanderboegh claims he is getting death threats himself and said he called the FBI to turn in an Easter card he allegedly received in the mail with bird mess inside. He thought it might be anthrax, he says, so he claims he started taking antibiotics. Yet he continues right on blogging about his "hate," even after several police vehicles and a hazardous materials truck showed up to claim the Easter card, and he was not treated as a hero or a patriot.

MBV: The "claims" are a matter of record, both here on this blog and in police reports. Something that this alleged "journalist" would know if he had bothered to check.


"I must admit that I am starting to develop a healthy hate, one that I must guard against if I do not want to become the same kind of beast that collectivism apparently manufactures so easily out of these godless assholes," Vanderboegh writes. "Acting like bugs, they've just about got me convinced of their absolute lack of any humanity.

"As I have written before, when you can think of them as bugs, as they think of us, it makes it easier to kill them," he continues. "I am now to the point where I almost DO think of them as bugs. Like Zander to the Brain Bug in Starship Troopers, I want to scream, 'One day, somebody like me is going to kill you, and your whole fucking race!' Collectivism has finally convinced me that it is a race unto its own.

"They have also demonstrated that this is an existential war of extermination, one way or another. Them or us. I vote them," he writes. "They still have to shoot first. But it will be the last temporary advantage they get. There ain't no live and let live with bugs."

He signs his posts Mike III, for Three Percent of gun owners.

Also this week, the manager of a local wildlife refuge at Turkey Creek had to notify Vanderboegh that he would no longer be allowed to deliver history lessons to schoolchildren.

Taylor Steele, director of the Turkey Creek Nature Preserve for Birmingham Southern College, said in an interview that Vanderboegh would tell stories as part of the park's programs and seemed pretty well-versed in history.

"I had no idea what his political or social faction was," Steele said. "Of course, when that story broke, I told my volunteer that we deal with kids, and that we can't have that element being part of that education program."

As a result, Vanderboegh writes on his blog in a classic example of the white Southern racist playing the victim, "So, I'm fired from a job I never took a dime for. It was perfectly predictable and I am actually amazed the collectivist academics took so long."

MBV: This moron doesn't even know that I was born in Michigan, raised in Ohio and didn't come to Alabama until 1985?!?


"Still, it hurts," he says. "It hurts a lot."

One of Vanderboegh's documented links is to another group called the Oath Keepers, which tries to recruit police officers and members of the US military to join their anti-federal government, racist cause.

MBV: Jeez. How many lies can this mook get in one sentence? I am not a member of Oath Keepers. I do look kindly on their efforts and have spoken of them with approval on my blog, but what "documented links" is this putz talking about? And what is he talking about Oath Keepers, a group that merely seeks to remind soldiers and police officers about the eternity of their oaths and the fact that it is to the Constitution and not to a man, a political party or even to an administration, as "anti-federal government"? And where does he get "racist"? Stewart Rhodes is the proud descendant of, among others, migrant Mexican farmworkers and Apache Indians. These are facts. Wilson would know them if he had done ANY research.


Writing on his blog about the FBI raids on militias in Michigan, Ohio and Indiana this week, where evidence suggests a group of right-wing radicals were planning to kill police officers and bomb their funerals, Vanderboegh calls it a "well thought out, perfectly targeted, craftily planned, brilliantly executed and impeccably timed" bit of public relations and "propaganda" on the part of the Obama administration, specifically designed to discredit him, his groups and their plans for 'revolution.'

"For the Imperial Feds, this was a propaganda coup of the tenth order of magnitude," he writes.

His advice to the "brotherhood" of white racists?

MBV: This flat out lying son of a bitch could have found out, had he done an even cursory Internet search, that I have fought the Klan, neoNazi and Identity terrorists all my life -- at street level where you risk something more than a bruised ego from being called a name.

1. I made a speech to a national militia gathering in 1995 (covered by lefty -- but intellectually honest -- journalist Dick Reavis) denouncing the racists, anti-Semites and neoNazis who were then trying to infiltrate the constitutional militia movement. I did it facing down "Prophet of the Most High Yahweh" Willie Ray Lampley and his bodyguard entourage -- all of whom were armed -- and I did it without a weapon of my own. (Although I must thank SGT Steve Studley, 1st New Mexico Militia, for sticking a .45 in the ribs of Lampley's bodyguard as he rose to do something, with the word, "Sit down, shut up, and listen to the nice man's speech." The bodyguard did. I didn't know Steve had been positioned for that moment but I'm damned glad he was. Lampley and his entourage left right after that, never to return. He was later busted on a terrorist bomb plot.) Wilson would know about this from Reavis' story if he did due diligence in a simple Internet search. He did not.

2. It was militia commanders like Bob Wright and me who carried out Operation White Rose, to get across to the racist and Identity terrorist-wannabes that it didn't matter if the FBI was giving them a free pass, that if anything else blew up the FBI could not protect them from the constitutional militia. This is documented in To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face. Did Wilson even know of its existence? Even if he had, it would have gotten in the way of his most cherished preconceived delusions.

3. It was my "Unwanted by the FBI" poster and my friends from the Virginia and New Jersey militias who put them up in Philadelphia that embarrassed the FBI into finally arresting Michael Brescia, a member of the Aryan Republican Army bank robbery gang. This is mentioned in Prof. Mark Hamm's book, In Bad Company. Also, Wilson might have consulted the George magazine article by James Ridgeway about J.D. Cash, Glenn Wilburn and me which has a photo of the poster. Or he might have consulted Ambrose Evans-Pritchard's book The Secret Life of Bill Clinton, or, again, Churchill's book. He obviously did none of these things.


"My recommendation: Stand fast. Await word. But be ready if this turns into another Waco."

Not far from Pinson in the southern Appalachian foothills in the towns of Springville and Trussville, other right-wing groups of Vanderboegh's ilk also thrive, and some of them have the official imprimatur of elected officials running for higher office.

State Sen. Hank Erwin, who is running as a Republican for Alabama lieutenant governor, is taking part in a Tea Party protest in Montgomery Tuesday, according to his Facebook page, where he calls himself "very conservative."

But not long ago, he attended a meeting of another radical right-wing group that has sprung up in Northeast Jefferson County, a modern-day Ku Klux Klan without the white robes that is also connected to the Tea Party movement.

"There is a popular city in Alabama that is slowly but surely becoming recognized in the political atmosphere as a 'must' visit. The town is Trussville, and in the last six months it has been a breeding ground for political action groups," Erwin claims on his Website. "The most recent group to join in the trend is serving as a counterpart to the women's movement, as a number of men demonstrated their frustration with the current economic crisis at what hopes to be the first of many 'Conservative Patriots Club' meetings."

The formation of a men's club comes after the so-called success of a women's group known as the "Republican Women of Trussville," which last month generated "one of the largest Tea Parties in the state," Erwin claims, with nearly 2,000 in attendance.

Leading the first meeting for the Conservative Patriots Club was Springville resident Harold Mathews, a small plane dealer and owner of Mathew's Manor, a private wedding chapel at the corner of US Highway 11 and Old Springville Road, where meetings take place every first Tuesday of the month at 7 PM.

According to three sources who have been asked to attend these meetings, but refused, that is now the official meeting place for the group, a fact unbeknownst to the Southern Poverty Law Center. In fact, during a call to the center's public relations office Tuesday morning, the SPLC said it had never heard of the Conservative Patriots Club, and would not comment on Erwin's conservative activism, since it is a nonprofit organization prohibited from taking part in politics.

Mathews runs a conservative email list, and three weeks before the election of Obama as the first black president in US history, he sent me an email message containing a death threat.

"You ignorant Boob!" he wrote. "The Obama machine slanted it so bad … This is what happens stupid, when people can get great gifts and benefits from government, it bankrupts the government. Now, we have all our taxes paying welfare at a exorbitant amount to people who aren't even a citizen of this country giving health care away like it is candy. Where does it stop? I guess when government gets so big that it tells YOU and the rest of the Liberal News rags WHAT TO WRITE and how to WRITE.

"You guys do not get it. They are already telling you and you are so blind to the facts of what is going on that when you do see it, it will be too late to fix without a revolution!" he continued. "Well maybe a revolution is good now and again. I know just where to put my first Bullet!"

*******************************************

I contacted Wilson on his cell phone, 205.960.3639. He hung up after calling me, among other things, a "motherfucker." I called him back and told his voice mail that I was putting him on notice of the factual errors in his screed and told him that if he did not retract them, I was going to sue him. I have always longed to own the property of a left collectivist blogger.

I will now send this to his email address, fast2write@charter.net.

We will see if his mouth has written checks that his ass refuses to cash.

Mike
III

The Hutaree and the eternal wisdom of the Shawnee people. -- 'Scar My Tattered Body No More With Your Punishing Dildo Mallet'

You may recall CPT R.A. Bear's explanation of the word "Hutaree" meaning "stupid white man" in the language of the Shawnee.

Here we have proof positive of the eternal wisdom of the Shawnee people. Be sure and watch the video.

Getting these guys to do anything their Fibbie provocateur wanted must have been a piece of cake.

The impending calamity -- Dogs and cats, living together. Mass hysteria.

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.

Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?

Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God type stuff.

Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.

Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!

Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...

Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!

Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!


Plus, Guam could tip over. (Be sure and watch the video.) A Democrat congressman demonstrates his grasp of the physical sciences, enunciating Fudd's First Law of Opposition:

"If you push something hard enough, it will fall over."

From the Firesign Theater album "I Think We're All Bozos On This Bus". First hit upon by scientist Sir Sidney Fudd when he accidentally knocked his wife down the stairs.


When this taxpayer-funded moke is finally able to apply Teslacle's Deviant to Fudd's Law -- "It goes in -- it must come out" -- he'll be banging on all cylinders.

Rachel continues to obsess about Sipsey Street


She has noticed "We Are Everywhere."

But she is not so much fascinated that she will take the chance of having me on her show for a sliver of equal time. Easier to continue to knock down the same straw man.

"The Manufactured Menace from Michigan, Part 2"

Another great one from Grigg.

"Damn good post." -- I have arrived. Claire Wolfe likes "We Are Everywhere."



I humbly thank Claire Wolfe for her compliment. High praise, indeed. Thanks, Claire.

Mike
III

MSNBC Mad Dogs Media Militia: Felony Ratings Thieves and Alleged Builders of a Hybrid Conflation/Hysteria WMD code-named "Brown Scare 3."

A Public Service Announcement from the Sipsey Street Irregulars:





Forwarded by CPT R.A. Bear. From Doug Ross of directorblue, we have this APB:

The MSNBC Militia

Recognize any of these pasty white folks?


If so, the Nielsen Company wants to speak with you, because a certain cable network's ratings are missing -- and all of these crackpots are "persons of interest".


In addition to being felonious ratings thieves, CPT Bear tells me that the MSNBC Mad Dogs Media Militia are suspected of working on a "hybrid conflation/hysteria WMD code-named 'Brown Scare Three.'" Bear says it is "the Mother Of All Illogic Bombs" and can cause "mass casualties of truth and reason when detonated in front of the credulous and weak-minded."

This is reputed to be their mastermind and high priest and guru, the Dai-Lie Llama:



These collectivist white-breads may also be recognized by their obsession with race -- more rabidly so than a Nazi Gauleiter of Lower Saxony in 1934 -- and never miss an opportunity to characterize themselves as "anti-racist" and their opponents as "racists." This is their illogical default position when challenged on the facts.

Don't worry about confronting them. They are as allergic about firearms as Dracula is about a crucifix and sunlight, although they see no hypocrisy in employing bodyguards armed with Uzis. But the bodyguards aren't a problem either because the MSNBC Mad Dogs are loathe to confront their victims directly and will avoid equal time at all costs, lest their carefully constructed lies come apart.

Unfortunately, they are a government-sponsored militia gang and an extension of the state-security apparatus so no one will be arresting them any time soon. The best defense against them is if you see some poor skull full of mush watching them, intervene and change the channel. They will thank you later.

This has been a public service announcement of the Sipsey Street Irregulars. You may now return to your regular business -- preparing to resist federal tyranny. That is all.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

"We are everywhere." -- A call for all Sons of Liberty and Three Percenters who can to join the IRS plus a little task for those who can't .



In talking to a reporter yesterday I was asked, "Well, what are you going to do for an encore (to the Window War)?"

I assured him that I did not think the Window War was quite finished, and that it would revive with the attempts to "cram down" the global warming and amnesty bills in the coming months. Indeed, I can foresee that if any GOPer treats with the declared enemies of the Founders' Republic on these issues, the windows of BOTH parties will be broken, just as I posited in my short story The Window War, so many years ago.

"But is that it? Is that all?" he asked.

I merely smiled.

I didn't tell him, but, no. That is not all.



From the film Michael Collins, 1993:

Michael Collins to Royal Irish Constabulary "G Man" Ned Broy: What's this? What's all this? You've been on my heels for weeks. Very eager for a G man.

Broy: I've something for you. (Reaching inside his coat.)

Collins: Don't! (Sticking a revolver in Broy's neck.)

Broy: (Unfazed.) Don't you ever calm down? (Hands Collins a piece of paper.) Names and addresses of the whole cabinet. They're to be lifted tonight. It's an illegal gathering... in open defiance of His Majesty's government.

Collins: How'd you get this?

Broy: Like you said, I'm eager, for a G man.

Collins: Why should I trust you?

Broy: Logically, I suppose you shouldn't. But I've been on your heels for weeks... making notes of your speeches. Let's just say that you can be persuasive.

Collins: You work for the Castle for Christ's sake..

Broy: I know. What was it you said... "Our only weapon is our refusal".


Well, as my Michigan grandma once told me, when life hands you lemons, make lemonade.

Nancy Pelosi has given us a great opportunity in the new "Health Care" Law. She's hiring some 16,000 plus new Internal Revenue agents to enforce her tyranny. So, why can't some of those be Three Percenters? I mean, there's a bunch of us out of work, yet we have clean records and skills that would dovetail nicely with those required of an IRS agent. Hey, we would also have the advantage of actually meaning it when they swear us in -- you know, that oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

Indeed, while the private sector is shrinking, government at most levels is still growing, so the IRS is not the only agency that could benefit from dozens, hundreds, thousands of Ned Broy's.

Sweet lemonade indeed.

Thanks a bunch, Nancy!

So sign up today! Our Dear Leader needs you to enforce the "Health Care" Act! Join. Learn. Lurk in the shadows, and await the right time and place to muck up the works. And you don't need a Michael Collins to report to. We have the Internet. Study Fourth Generation Warfare and open source insurgency at John Robb's Global Guerrillas site and others. Begin today. Leave no trace. Shut up about your politics. At the very least, we will cause the IRS to waste vast amounts of time and money trying to ferret out our Ned Broy's during the selection process. And if you make it through, study, watch and wait.

I can see whole reams of internal documents posted anonymously to the web, raids compromised with no one there when the door lock is blown in by those new 14 inch barrel entry shotguns. I can see an entire agency in a blue funk, eating at its own vitals.

Oh yes, join now, without delay.

And for those of you who cannot do this, I have this task which is the best force multiplier suggestion I can think of.

Today, we must begin a new campaign: We Are Everywhere.

For we are, you know. Our Socialist Mandarin masters like Nancy Pelosi rub elbows with us everyday, though they do not know it.

We carry their mail and packages.

We check out their groceries.

We clean out their drains, fix their wiring, install their alarm systems and hand them their lattes at Starbucks.

We ARE everywhere.

Everywhere.

They do not know this. It never enters their minds. Even if they knew it, they wouldn't care. We have no opinions, they believe, that they are bound to respect. In truth, they despise us. You can tell that by the sneering names they call us and by the arrogance with which they corruptly arrange tyrannical laws.

But they do not know that we are everywhere, passing through, or working in, their offices, their side businesses, their homes.

It is time to remind them.

Send them the message: We are everywhere.

There is no need to explain further. The message is the message.

So send them the message.

By little notes left in their morning papers.

By email, fax and letter.

By phone call.

It is no threat. "We are everywhere." Who is "we"? What do we mean "everywhere"? The message is the message. Nothing more is required. I suppose if you wanted to put a "III" on it, that would be okay, but keep it simple, keep it effective. The message is the message, and I can just see Eric Holder and his boys scratching their heads, trying to make a case out of three little words that by themselves threaten nobody.

Scrawl it in felt-tip pen on the restroom walls of federal buildings.

Leave it in the lockers at the athletic clubs they frequent.

Print it on stickers and slap them on the bumpers of their cars.

We are everywhere.

Paint it on sidewalks wherever it suits your fancy.

Put it on billboards for everyone to see.

We are everywhere.

Especially -- soon, thanks to Nancy Pelosi -- within the vitals of the Internal Revenue Service.

We are everywhere.

If you agree with this idea, pass it on. Let it go viral.

We are everywhere, Nancy.

Deal with it.

Mike Vanderboegh
The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters.
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com

PS: Oh, and thanks in advance for employing some of us.

PPSS: Threepers, I especially draw your attention to these guys: http://www.treas.gov/tigta/careers.shtml. TIGTA is like the "Internal Affairs" of IRS. Ought to be some great openings for Three Percenters there. Go for it!

"And remember, lads, find out what they eat for breakfast."

LATER: Carl Bussjaeger sends this design, done in a few easy strokes.

"Enemies of the State"


As an identified "enemy of the state" (and proud of it, too!), I present Ms. Crowley's analysis of the situation we find ourselves in.

Mike
III

Enemies of the state

Administration smears some opponents, arrests others

By Monica Crowley

During President George W. Bush's two terms, you couldn't drive far without seeing a particular bumper sticker: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." Now that Democrats control the White House and Congress, the left treats dissent as the lowest form of treason. When the left agitates over government policies, it's considered righteous anger. When the right - and much of the center - agitate, it's painted as the rantings of the criminally and violently insane.

With Obamacare signed into law, Democrats have stopped congratulating themselves long enough to notice that the American people aren't cheering on the sidelines. According to a CNN poll released last week, 58 percent oppose President Obama's handling of Obamacare, while Gallup shows him this week with a 46 percent job approval, his lowest yet. A CBS poll released after the House of Representatives passed Obamacare showed Speaker Nancy Pelosi's favorable rating at 11 percent and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's at 8 percent, higher only than Beelzebub's.

Aware that their "reform" is rejected by most of the American people and that they will face serious consequences in November, the Democrats have decided that the best defense is a good offense: Attack those who oppose Obamacare. It doesn't seem to bother most Democrats that that pernicious strategy puts them in the weird and politically untenable position of attacking most of the American people.

Over the past week, a parade of Democrats have accused members of the Tea Party movement and other opponents of Obamacare of threatening them. There may be an infinitesimal number of looney tunes who have engaged in that kind of unacceptable behavior out of hundreds of millions of Americans. But the Democrats have dishonestly extrapolated from a few claimed incidents to taint all those who reject Obamacare as wild-eyed wackos.

If this sounds familiar, it's because the Democrats have shown a disturbing pattern of demonizing those who disagree with them. A year ago, Mr. Obama's Department of Homeland Security issued a report for law enforcement called "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." It suggested that anyone who opposed abortion, illegal immigration and oppressive taxes, supported gun rights or served in Iraq and Afghanistan should be singled out for special attention. Why? Because such people might burst into a spasm of violence at any time. There was no mention of being on the lookout for potential violence committed by Islamic jihadists, even after actual acts of violence committed by an Islamic jihadist in Little Rock. (The Fort Hood shooting happened later.)

In other words, if you go to church, believe in protecting innocent life, own a gun or defend your country, the Democrats consider you a potential enemy of the state. It was no coincidence that the Homeland Security report was issued just as the Tea Party movement was gaining real national traction.

Not surprisingly, then, once they had passed their widely unpopular health care bill, the Democrats moved quickly to delegitimize opposition to it. Their defiant move in the face of overwhelming popular resistance gave them another excuse to equate big-government progressives with good patriots and small government advocates with potentially violent nutcases who must be watched.

As if on cue, this week, Homeland Security, the FBI and the Department of Justice's Joint Terrorism Task Force carried out raids against a purported "Christian militia group" in the Midwest. According to reports, nine people have been charged with plotting to kill police officers with "weapons of mass destruction." The indictment describes the group as an "anti-government extremist organization" and the FBI special agent in charge, Andrew Arena, cast it as "radical and fringe." That may be, but the description has a conveniently familiar ring to it.

Interestingly, the head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Dawud Walid, rushed to announce the raids at a CAIR banquet at about the same time the story became public. "We salute the FBI for breaking up a militia that was seeking to harm American Muslims," he said. It's curious that he would know that at a time when the FBI still had the investigation under seal. (We're still waiting to hear why Homeland Security and the FBI chose to use the descriptive word "Christian" when they seem unable to use the word "Muslim" in connection with Islamic extremism.)

It's mind-blowingly coincidental that these raids on a supposedly "Christian" militia group would come at the exact moment that Democrats were trying to change public opinion on Obamacare by claiming persecution by their opponents. They have cast Tea Partiers, conservatives, independents, Christians and militia members as all cut from the same unstable, volatile cloth. How can anyone take their opposition to the Democrats' agenda seriously when they're toting guns and being raided by Homeland Security and the FBI? They're all nuts, don't you know?

The Democrats handle dissent by isolating it, smearing it and delegitimizing it in order to crush it. The warning should be clear: If you have small-government, traditional values, you may be considered by your own leadership to be an enemy of the state.

Monica Crowley is a nationally syndicated radio host, a panelist on "The McLaughlin Group" and a Fox News contributor.

Madness.

Sheer, bloody madness. My thanks to Irregular K7C for bringing this to my attention.

"How the Left Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the FBI"


From the Independent Institute, a libertarian think tank based in Oakland, CA, we have this analysis which is pretty much spot on.

I would only add to Gregory's essay that this is certainly nothing new. It was the FBI snitch who provided the dynamite for the 16th Street Church bombing in Birmingham in 1963. The Feds never went back to the case to prosecute the surviving bombers until Gary Thomas Rowe was safely dead.

Also, it was the FBI that short-circuited a proposed ATF raid upon the Identity compound at Elohim City, OK, in February 1995 which was based on the information provided by ATF "confidential informant" Carol Howe (and unlike Mt. Carmel, EC really was a "compound" with bunkers, etc.) saying "Elohim is ours." With all the informants and provocateurs later demonstrated to have run through EC like woodworm, the FBI certainly had both strategic and tactical warning of the OKC bombing. Why they kept the ATF from raiding the place when Carol Howe reported that the most dangerous man there was a guy named "Andy the German" who had proposed bombing an OKC federal building, scouted targets, etc., can only be explained by the FBI.

After the bombing, the FBI was singularly disinterested in following any lead which led to Andreas Carl Strassmeier or EC. Also after the bombing, FBI OKC SAC Thomas Kukor continued to visit Elohim City personally, even singing in the choir during "church services," an act he described as "community outreach." When I called him on it on-line in the "John Doe Times" and in a subsequent phone call, he replied "I can't discuss anything about the OKC case." I said, "Well, Tom, that's the first time the FBI has admitted that EC had anything to do with the OKC bombing. Thanks for the tip." He quickly back-pedaled. "Pastor" Robert Millar, the leader of EC, later admitted he also was an FBI informant. The Southern Poverty Law Center also had an informant inside EC at this time, a fact that is mentioned both in FBI communications after the bombing and later admitted on tape by Morris Dees to my good friend and Oklahoma lawyer and journalist J.D. Cash. These are indisputable facts and one reason why Morris Dees never accepted my challenge to an open debate. Lying schmuck.

(For the uninitiated, EC provided a support structure, training facility and explosives testing ground for the Aryan Republican Army terrorist cell and bank robbery gang. "Prophet of the most high Yahweh" Willie Ray Lampley also tested his bombs there with the assistance of yet another FBI snitch. It was sort of a neoNazi Switzerland where the cops couldn't go. The FBI has admitted that McVeigh called Andreas Carl Strassmeir using the "Darryl Bridges" phone card a few days before the bombing and receipts prove that he stayed at a motel near EC, which is waaaaay out in the boonies of Eastern Oklahoma. No coincidence.)

Mike
III

How the Left Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the FBI

By Anthony Gregory on Mar 30, 2010 in Civil Liberties, Surveillance, The State

At the close of World War I, the federal government created the General Intelligence Division, an agency that eventually morphed into the modern FBI. One of GID’s main tasks was to compile a list of hundreds of thousands of radicals—socialists, anarchists, labor activists and antiwar agitators. Thousands were arrested for being suspected Communists. Hundreds of anarchists were deported to Bolshevik Russia, the silver lining being that left-anarchists like Emma Goldman discovered and wrote about the pure horror of Leninism and the fact that “proletarian dictatorship” was not any sort of improvement upon the wartime corporatism of the U.S. under Woodrow Wilson.

In the late 1920s, the renamed Bureau of Investigation spied on such “socialist” threats as Albert Einstein. Under Franklin Roosevelt, although the FBI continued to keep track of left radicals, it found a new enemy in the form of opponents of the New Deal. FDR used the FBI to spy on multitudes of peaceful rightwingers, unleashing a Brown Scare that was later turned against the left during the McCarthy-era Red Scare. Roosevelt even spied on his Republican presidential opponent, Wendell Willkie.

But during the Cold War, Republican and Democratic administrations again focused the FBI, for the most part, on disrupting the left. Its COINTELPRO operation—a program to “track, expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities” of political radicals—was a great success. FBI’S COINTELPRO forged letters to bring about violence between the Black Panthers and United Slaves. In 1976, a Senate report showed that the FBI had boasted that “Although no specific counterintelligence action can be credited with contributing to this overall situation, it is felt that a substantial amount of the unrest [among left radical groups] is directly attributable to this program.”

While the FBI was used to infiltrate rightwing anti-Civil Rights and anti-integrationist activists, it was also targeted against stalwarts of the Civil Rights movement. The FBI monitored everyone from Martin Luther King in the 1960s to John Lennon in the 1970s. In the late 70s, the Church Committee reports in the Senate culminated in some effort to rein in this horribly abusive federal agency.

In the 1990s, the FBI was at the center of the militia scare, with its snipers and strongmen turned against peaceful separatist Randy Weaver and his family, and later at the Waco, Texas, standoff with Branch Davidians, at the end of which FBI agents gassed, shot and killed dozens of David Koresh’s followers at their home at Mt. Carmel. They used incendiary devices, which might have brought on the fire, and then lied about it.

It was in this period that the modern left became enamored of the federal police state and especially the FBI. Almost none of them stood up for the Branch Davidians. They came to think of FBI agents as a professional, national and enlightened force populated by such figures as the Jodie Foster character in Silence of the Lambs, an agency that enforced civil rights, protected the country from “rightwing extremists,” and overturned the injustices of local, prejudiced law enforcement.

But during the Bush II era, when the administration was reported to be reviving COINTELPRO, the left’s distrust of national police forces also became revived. In October 2003, the FBI extensively spied on peaceful Iraq war protesters, focusing especially on “anarchists. . . capable of violence.” Bush’s FBI activities were a throwback to the post-World War I General Intelligence Division’s obsession with anarchists. In 2005, the ACLU sued to reveal in court that it had been monitored by the FBI, which had over a thousand pages of documentation on the organization, as had Greenpeace and other politically leftist organizations. Religious pacifist groups were also spied on and infiltrated. And one “terror plot” after another allegedly discovered and broken up by the administration just in the nick of time turned out to be a group of poor saps of below-average intelligence who had been duped by federal informants into saying something threatening or “planning” a terror attack on American infrastructure with no chance at all of being successful, and probably no chance of having even come up with the idea without federal prodding and agitation. The concern about the return of Cold War-era FBI infiltration of fringe groups was once again seen on the left.

Now we are back to the Brown Scare, to militia hysteria, to fears that the out-of-power anti-government right, Christian groups, separatists, gunowners, opponents of national social programs, census and tax resisters and so forth are a great threat to American security. With all the Bush-era anti-Muslim hysteria and war on terror authoritarianism still in place, we have under Obama a revitalization of 1990s-style paranoia about “hate groups,” survivalists and indeed the entire populist right. Just as Bush conservatives could not differentiate Saddam Hussein from Osama bin Laden, or an innocent Muslim doing charity work in Pakistan from an engineer of 9/11, or an antiwar American activist from an anti-American enemy within giving comfort to the enemy abroad, so too do the Obama leftists conflate peaceful separatists with violent racists, peaceful survivalist militia men with Timothy McVeigh.

Every act of violence or alleged plan to commit violence or even adamant anti-government activism that can be pinned on the “extremist right”—the shooter who murdered a guard at the Holocaust museum, the man who murdered an abortion doctor in church, the man who flew a plane through an IRS building, some “militia” members allegedly planning anti-government violence—all of this is seen as part of a general trend, even a rightwing conspiracy, one about as coherent as the neoconservatives’ lumping together all anti-US Muslims under the banner of “Islamofascism.” Indeed, I am surprised that not many have yet warned of the “Christofascist” threat to America, although there has been plenty of talk comparing the tea party movement to the Nazi brownshirts and talk that this kind of militia activity is often associated with “race war,” even when the particular subjects at hand are not even accused of being racially motivated.

And so when a progressive like Rachel Maddow cheers that the Michigan militia members can be indicted and imprisoned without having done anything violent, when she reports that the FBI has infiltrated this group for months and stepped in to arrest them just in the nick of time, we should not be too surprised when she fails to make the obvious connection, and fails to be the least bit skeptical of the federal government’s police agents infiltrating a group for months only to discover that that group’s members are saying things about government that amount to “seditious conspiracy.” What kind of Orwellian world is it when the government can arrest people accused only of planning to commit violence against government agents and unleash a “civil war” that we all know is only a fantasy? What kind of world is it when the very media figure who denounced Bush’s “preemptive war” and Obama’s adoption of Bush’s “pre-crime” approach to imprisoning “enemy combatants” in “prolonged detention” before they commit violence is happy to see a group indicted on federal charges of talking about committing violence—talk that we can safely guess was likely incited by the very FBI that had been infiltrating this group for months? What kind of absurdist dystopia has the left crying foul when a private citizen infiltrates ACORN, but has no similar apprehensions about the FBI infiltrating “extremist” groups and arresting them for “seditious conspiracy”? How can anyone who saw through the Bush lies of war and crackdowns in the name of “national security” and stopping madmen from getting “weapons of mass destruction” really believe that fewer than a dozen Americans with some rifles and some pipebombs were themselves planning to use “weapons of mass destruction” in any way that posed a threat to the U.S. government? And what about the charge of having weapons in connection to a crime—that crime being the intention of one day committing a crime?

Of course, preempting people from committing acts of criminal violence is just and sometimes necessary, but the list of questionable charges levied at these people, on the tail end of months of FBI infiltration, would seem to be in a different category, and at least warrants more critical examination before passing judgment. One can abhor and condemn the idea of violence and oppose vehemently the types of acts that these men and women are accused of planning—and certainly, I do—while still smelling a rat in the way such sting operations are conducted, or at least demonstrating some journalistic skepticism that the government’s side of the story is 100% accurate and justifies the imprisonment of these people and the hysteria on which this kind of government activity thrives.

But once again, with their people at the helm of state, the left has decided to embrace the FBI, take it at its word, assume that people are guilty until proven innocent once accused of guilt by the police state that they now see as the guardian of order against rightwing extremism. Especially strange is the tendency of leftists to fear rightists out of power even more than in power. The same dynamic can be seen on the other side. The left and the right love power, and although that power is often directed against their own when the other side is at the reins, they cannot abandon the idea that a police state can be pinpointed only against those they hate, and not those with whom they sympathize. The responsible, non-partisan and indeed American thing to do is to harbor extreme skepticism toward the state when it spies, infiltrates, arrests and imprisons anyone, and most especially those whose alleged crime is “sedition” or “conspiracy” or in any way being the enemy of the state.

A note on sources: Much of this history is discussed in Geoffrey Stone’s Perilous Times. A lot of the stuff on the FBI’s history I read years back in Roland Kessler’s Bureau: The Secret History of the FBI. A good treatment of COINTELPRO can be found in James Bovard’s Terrorism and Tyranny. On Waco see Carol Moore’s the Davidian Massacre and my Waco archives. And see the ACLU on some of the surveillance abuses under the Bush administration.

What "Hutaree" Means

Everybody has been asking, in one form or the other, "What does 'Hutaree' mean?" And is it "Who-tar-eee" or "Hut-tar-ee"? The correct pronunciation seems to be "Who-tar-eee," but I had to turn to CPT R.A. Bear, the S-2 of the formidable and legendary Dogtown Rangers for an explanation of the meaning of the word.

Young CPT Bear was understanding. "I'm not surprised you don't know, hardly anybody does."

"Well?"

"'Hutaree' is a Shawnee word meaning 'stupid white man.'"

Barone is nobody's April Fool.

From the man who first described the Obama administration as "gangster government," we have this.

April 1, 2010

Tea Partiers Embrace Liberty, Not Big Government

By Michael Barone

Over the past 14 months, our political debate has been transformed into an argument between the heirs of two fundamental schools of political thought, the Founders and the Progressives. The Founders stood for the expansion of liberty and the Progressives for the expansion of government.

It's an argument that has been going on for a century but was largely dormant over the quarter-century of low-inflation economic growth that followed the Ronald Reagan tax cuts. It's been raised again by the expand-government policies of the Obama administration and Democratic congressional leaders.

Those policies, thoroughly in line with the Progressive tradition, have been advanced by liberal elites in government, media, think tanks and academia. The opposition, roughly in line with the Founders tradition, has been led by the non-elites who spontaneously flocked to tea parties and town halls. Republican politicians have been scrambling to lead these protestors.

The conservative rebellions of the late 1970s and middle 1990s were focused on taxes. The tea partiers are focusing on the expansion of government -- and its threat to the independence of citizens.

The first mention of tea parties came in February 2009 from CNBC's Rick Santelli on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, when he asked "if we really want to subsidize the losers' mortgages. How many of you people want to pay your neighbor's mortgage, that has an extra bathroom and can't pay their bills?" Then he called for a Chicago tea party.

This struck a chord. Tea partiers began to dress in 18th century costumes -- political re-enactors -- and brandished the "Don't tread on me" flag. They declared their independence by opposing Progressive policies that encourage dependence on government.

The Progressives have always assumed that people needed safety nets and would welcome dependence on government. The public's clear rejection of the Democratic health care bills has shown that this assumption was unwarranted. Americans today prefer independence to dependence on government, just as they did 200 years ago.

All this was supposed to have been consigned to the past long ago. The Progressives of the early 1900s -- Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, New Republic founder Herbert Croly -- argued that in an industrial era of mass production and giant businesses, ordinary people were helpless and needed government's guiding hand. It would be more efficient, they argued, for centralized, disinterested experts to administer national institutions than to let chaotic markets operate freely and to observe the Constitution's horse-and-buggy limits on government power. The Founders were out of date.

The Progressives had their way for much of the 20th century. But it became apparent that centralized experts weren't disinterested, but always sought to expand their power. And it became clear that central planners can never have the kind of information that is transmitted instantly, as Friedrich von Hayek observed, by price signals in free markets.

It turned out that centralized experts are not as wise and ordinary Americans are not as helpless as the Progressives thought. By passing the stimulus package and the health care bills, the Democrats produced expansion of government. But voters seem to prefer expansion of liberty.

The Progressives' scorn for the Founders has not been shared by the people. First-rate books about the Founders have been bestsellers. And efforts to dismiss the Founders as slaveholders, misogynists or homophobes have been outweighed by the resonance of their words and deeds.

The Declaration of Independence's proclamation that "all men are created equal" with "unalienable rights" to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" has proved to be happily elastic. It still sings to us today, thanks to the struggles and sacrifices of many Americans who gave blacks and women the equality denied to them in 1776.

In contrast, the early Progressives' talk of an "industrial age" and an outmoded Constitution sounds like the language of an age now long past. Their faith in centralized planning seems naive in a time when one unpredicted innovation after another has changed lives for the better.

Polls and recent election results tell us that racial minorities and the so-called "educated class" -- the people who expect their kind will administer centralized institutions -- still take the side of the Progressives. Most Americans, however, are rejecting the path of dependence and are intent on declaring their independence once again.