Friday, June 14, 2013

Santa Monica college shooting may provoke push to regulate '80% receivers'

In the meantime, though, if one without extensive gunsmithing and metalworking skills wants to acquire truly effective firepower that has never been "on the grid" with regard to the government's knowledge of it, starting from an incomplete receiver might be the most sensible way to go about it. The "gun control" zealots in government may try very hard to change that, but can they?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Seems awful "convenient" that this has surfaced right after that article on "build parties of AKs" in SoCal a few weeks ago.

False flag? Who knows....but one does have to wonder considering the propaganda machine in Amerika.

Anonymous said...

Link to AK build party:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/05/ak-47-semi-automatic-rifle-building-party

Ed said...

I used to work with someone who was an apprentice mechanical engineer in Germany. As part of his education, he was given a set of blueprints, a hunk of metal, a file, and instructions to remove all metal that was not in the part depicted by the blueprints. To pass, he was required to make the part as depicted.

There are many out there with the skills necessary to make a functional rifle receiver or pistol frame from a 0% billet - a plain rectangular block of metal.

Unfortunately, many in government cannot differentiate mental illness from stupidity.

Anonymous said...

I looked at the pictures of the guns alegedly used in the shooting the ar appeared to be a sbr ( illeagle ) and the pistol looked like an 1858 remington replica with a conversion cylinder can you say slow to reload? This just confirms that a criminal will always find a way.