Sipsey Street Irregulars: No Decision Yet as Supreme Court Relists Gun Ban Case.

Saturday, November 7, 2015

No Decision Yet as Supreme Court Relists Gun Ban Case.

The continued relisting of Friedman ought to have gun owners on pins and needles, because the Supreme Court did not decline the case outright, meaning some of the Justices want to hear it. It remains to be seen if they will, or if they will once more hide from their responsibility without comment. If they do take on the case, a decision siding with gun prohibitionists will provoke millions of angry gun owners to embrace the “we will not comply/your move” new paradigm, and that could quickly get dangerous.

7 comments:

Galaxie_Man said...: I say why wait for a rogue SCOTUS decision against our God Given Rights? Hasn't 81 years of all out war on private arms ownership been enough? It certainly has been for me, proudly non-compliant since 1994. I encourage as many people that will listen to join The Armed Civil Disobedience of Non-Compliance.....NOW!!

DEFY-DECEIVE-EVADE-RESIST-SMUGGLE; November 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM
Anonymous said...: "we will not comply" should be changed to "we shall not comply" - If you think it's nitpicking, ask an attorney to explain the significance.; November 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM
Anonymous said...: "Will not" implies a personal conviction. "Shall not" implies a more universal prohibition.; November 7, 2015 at 8:13 AM
Wilber said...: I would be curious on the discussion right above (i.e., "Shall"); November 7, 2015 at 8:35 AM
Dave said...: The supreme court rendered itself irrelevant/illegitimate long ago.; November 7, 2015 at 9:17 AM
Anonymous said...: I'd prefer to see Ginsburg have no more votes on gun rights cases. Spend the next year year and a half refusing to comply and then make a full court press on GCA and NFA at the fundamental premise level. It is worth waiting until Ginsburg is gone.; November 7, 2015 at 12:22 PM
Anonymous said...: This whole process of SCOTUS reviewing constitutional rights is illegal and corrupt. Its based on the premise that only courts and lawyers can interpret the constitution but when you read Article 3 Section 2 it specifically restricts the SCOTUS authority to laws created by congress.
To put it in their terms SCOTUS has "No Standing"

Yank lll; November 7, 2015 at 10:21 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Saturday, November 7, 2015

No Decision Yet as Supreme Court Relists Gun Ban Case.

7 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers