The ORIGINAL gathering place for a merry band of Three Percenters. (As denounced by Bill Clinton on CNN!)
"From 2004 to 2014, over 2,000 terror suspects legally purchased guns in the United States."
Bob Owens comments: "Post’s Ingraham Suggests Gun Owners Should Be Treated Like Terrorists."
France's restrictive gun laws did nothing to prevent the recent terrorist attacks. We do not know who is on the American "terrorist watch list", but apparently it includes friends and family members of suspected "terrorists". Why aren't the "terrorists" already in jail? Perhaps the department of future crime has nothing to pin on them? It goes to show that the collectivists are scraping the bottom of their barrel of lies and dirty tricks, in their vain effort to reduce Americans to living on their knees.Thought control and future crime have no place in our Constitution. Men and women are known by their deeds.
Seems like Mike and Bob have a certain angle in common of late. Folks interested in doing no more than defending ourselves and our nation from a Muslim invasion and Islamic aggression have been somehow reduced to "baby killers" aka terrorists. It occurs to me that the baby killer card was played before in our history......
In all seriousness, Mr. Mike Vanderboegh, why do you continue to link to Bob Owens? Yes, there may be some common ground, but even after reading Tom Baugh on his ideas for keeping the III movement intact, I will not support any statist - either from the left or, as in Owen's case, the right.As far as I am concerned Owens relegated himself to the junk heap when he outed himself as a copsucker of the highest order. In the past he has shown that he supports The Only Ones over individual liberties. I have no use for anyone that puts the government before individual liberty.
So the "2,000" are known - just how many have subsequently caused any problems with their firearms?III
Are not we all "terror suspects?" Why else are they monitoring our telephone calls and otherwise spying on us?
The problem has never been dealt with at its root and a lot of effort has been put forth to obscure and confuse the issue. It's an IMMIGRATION issue. 9/11 couldn't have happened if those fuckers were not here. Terrorists can't buy guns in the USA if they aren't here. Mexicans can't drive drunk and kill US citizens if they are t here. And they can't shoot beautiful young women in San Francisco if they are not in San Francisco. Hegalian dialectect. Create a problem, what for the obvious reaction and then offer the solution that serves and suits your agenda best. Immigrants have been used to create a great number of problems in this country so that the government may offer solutions. I frankly don't see what solutions the vast majority of immigrants have offered to this country. Multi culturalism and diversity are responsible for 95% of our social ills. I'd like somebody to make a convincing argument about why we should let more of these low breed third-world criminal welfare sucking parasites into this country? Whatever "good" you think they do or provide is vastly outweighed by their burden on society and the problems they create by being here. It's time for deportation before we are forced into a Civil War. It's a very simple solution: terrorists cannot buy guns in the United States of America if terrorists are not in the United States of America.
Post a Comment