Not by any means the only blunder of its kind in WW2. Pelelu , Merrell's Marauders, The invasion of the P.I. were all a colossal waste of human life that didn't take a single day off the war. In fact a good case can be made that everything MacAurther did during the ENTIRE war was a complete waste as under his plan the USAAF wouldn't have been within bombing range of Japan until the fall of Formosa in late 1945. C. Nimitz "Central Pacific" campaign won the war in the Pacific. "Mac" had nothing to do with that. ---Ray
Mac's greatest contribution would have been the march into China in the next war, but he was too much of a grandstanding jackass to get the president on his side.
I'm no military genius by any stretch of the imagination, but wouldn't the theory of "Blitzkrieg" dictate passing an impenetrable area like that, in order to gain ground and restrict losses? Maybe high Command intentionally wanted to slow the advance down to give the Russians time to get to Berlin?
I get the idea that US and Russian commands had little care for losses, especially when they knew they had Germany on the mat. It wasn't their lives being wasted (save for in the case of the Russian commands where Stalin was a literal threat to their lives if results weren't obtained). It's stupid to fight in built up areas and in forrests, if you surround them long enough in such areas they will come out to you on their own eventually.
4 comments:
Not by any means the only blunder of its kind in WW2. Pelelu , Merrell's Marauders, The invasion of the P.I. were all a colossal waste of human life that didn't take a single day off the war. In fact a good case can be made that everything MacAurther did during the ENTIRE war was a complete waste as under his plan the USAAF wouldn't have been within bombing range of Japan until the fall of Formosa in late 1945. C. Nimitz "Central Pacific" campaign won the war in the Pacific. "Mac" had nothing to do with that. ---Ray
Mac's greatest contribution would have been the march into China in the next war, but he was too much of a grandstanding jackass to get the president on his side.
I'm no military genius by any stretch of the imagination, but wouldn't the theory of "Blitzkrieg" dictate passing an impenetrable area like that, in order to gain ground and restrict losses? Maybe high Command intentionally wanted to slow the advance down to give the Russians time to get to Berlin?
I get the idea that US and Russian commands had little care for losses, especially when they knew they had Germany on the mat. It wasn't their lives being wasted (save for in the case of the Russian commands where Stalin was a literal threat to their lives if results weren't obtained). It's stupid to fight in built up areas and in forrests, if you surround them long enough in such areas they will come out to you on their own eventually.
Post a Comment