Thursday, March 28, 2013

Bring it on, Blue Helmets.

Final Version of Arms Trade Treaty Released; Civilian Disarmament on Track
As the representative of one pro-gun control organization told this reporter last week, “Guns without bullets are no deadlier than baseball bats.” The UN plans to eventually rid the world of privately owned weapons; failing to do that, however, they will prevent the purchase (or reloading) of ammunition.
And folks wonder why the shelves at WalMart are empty within minutes of restocking,


Crustyrusty said...

Those bright blue helmets and berets make wonderful targets for my aging eyes...

Jus' saying....

Anonymous said...

The U.S. Senate has passed a resolution prohibiting the U.S. from signing on to that UN treaty. You can thank the political power of the NRA, in part, for scaring enough Democrat senators into taking our side on that issue to make a majority.
- Old Greybeard

Disciple of Night said...

Cordell Hull would be ashamed to see what's become of his brain-child.

carlwk3c said...

It will be interesting to see how the Obama regime tries to get around the senate vote on the UN arms treaty.

Jimmy the Saint said...

"The U.S. Senate has passed a resolution prohibiting the U.S. from signing on to that UN treaty."

And we can always trust the US Government to scrupulously follow its own strictures. Seriously.
- Zombie Sitting Bull

Anonymous said...

Is it coincidence that UN HQ is in ... New York?

Cummo - Bloomberg - UN

Nah! Three is enemy action!


William Flatt said...

The UN is a threat, but it is NOT the main threat! WE are our own worst enemy!

The powers that be are banking on the cognitive dissonance of the American people to reject out of hand the necessity that is now upon us ...that the only way to fix the monumental screw-up that is America today, we must 'go back to formula' and kill all these motherf#ckers to the last one, and then hit the 1776 reset button.

They also are counting on the inability of the American people to achieve consensus as to WHEN to shoot the bastards, knowing that we will not commit to open fires when there is no blatant act of aggression on their part... and THEY keep rolling back the line of demarcation through their repeated offenses, our repeated acquiesence, and psychological operations geared precisely toward nullifying the average American's sense of outrage and resistance to THEIR TYRANNY.

I believe in Mike V's concept of 'No Fort Sumpters', but I also believe in Thomas Jefferson's dictum that an unpunished insult becomes the parent of many others! We have long passed the point where unpunished insults to our Liberty have negated the 'No Fort Sumpters' rule; but the cognitive dissonance of the patriot movement as a whole prevents us from uniting solidly and converting all those outside the movement who fully grasp that SOMETHING is fully f%&#ed up in this country but don't know what, who, how, and why.

Address this issue and the movement can be led to victory and the nation to Liberty. Damn the MRAP toasters-on-wheels that can't go off-road or over low-GVW county bridges... Give me Liberty; Lead, Follow, or get the frak out of the way!

What we need to defend against is their pie-slice technique. They keep taking infinitesimal slivers of the pie, depending on the thinness of the slices they take from our Liberty being SO SLIGHT that we will not be able to justifiably rise up against such a thin wedge!!

We need to act not on the basis of the thin slice, but the massive chunk that has already been removed from our Liberty Pie! How many more slivers are YOU willing to allow, UN or not, before the liberty pie is GONE and any HOPE of resistance is gone forever??

Pray that the day never comes, for if it does, history will brand all Americans as cowards and sheep for allowing such evil to happen. SILENCE IS CONSENT!!

"But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty once lost is lost forever."
- John Adams, letter to Abigail Adams, 1775

BadCyborg said...

[b][i]"Cordell Hull would be ashamed to see what's become of his brain-child."[/i][/b]

Considering he worked for Über-Progressive FDR, I'm not so sure of that. In fact I rather suspect he'd be please with the progress made towards world government.