Friday, March 29, 2013

Any time they feel froggy.

"Buyers, beware: UN Arms Trade Treaty will regulate individual gun ownership."
The Arms Trade Treaty will regulate individual gun ownership all across the world. Each country will be obligated to “maintain a national control list that shall include [rifles and handguns]” and "to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms.” In fact, the new background check rules approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee include just those rules -- a registration system and a record of all transfers of guns.
I can think of nothing more desirable than an American regime that uses a UN excuse (and especially UN troops) to enforce citizen disarmament. Nothing could be more calculated to unite American resistance and the entire scheme -- domestic and global tyranny and its practitioners -- would be swept away in a hail of targeted gunfire. Let the UN try to come to this country and attempt this and watch what happens:
"Two Belgian paratroopers who were photographed "roasting" a Somali boy over a flaming brazier are expected to be jailed for only a month and fined £200 after admitting the atrocity in a military court in Brussels yesterday." -- London Telegraph, 24 June 1997.

18 comments:

SWIFT said...

I once saw an article about U.N. troops arriving somewhere for peacekeeping. They were from Bangladesh. What a herd! They were immediately rejected and sent home. Third world countries would get a real ass whooping here in CONUS. With the martial law agreements between the U.S. and Canada, if Canadian troops come, it will be a much different fight. Still, we know the terrain and just how many can they send? As I've stated before, if your rifle is not pointed in the same direction as mine, you are my enemy and I will kill you. ALL threats, foreign and domestic.

Anonymous said...

"Let the UN try to come to this country and attempt this..."

I think the phrase you're looking for, in that context, is "Turkey Shoot".

It's almost laughable to think about that scenario. Even the hoodies with Ja-Nines and Davis eye punchers would have a field day.

Anonymous said...

Don't care how camouflaged the UN uniforms, those blue helmets make SUCH EXCELLENT targets.

B Woodman
III-per

FG said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b37y4qxuH4I

Great Song about U.N. troops....

The "money quote" lyric on blue helmets comes at the
2:55 point.

Trinity said...

I really don't think even the Obamessiah is stupid enough to bring in foreign troops -- even if "UN sanctified" as "peacekeepers"-- as that would not only turn even more of the standing military against his regime, it would awaken many couch potatoes to the actual dangers they are now able to ignore.

Look for more and bigger false flag operations which would be used to justify even more draconian laws to clamp down on Americans, if not permit a full martial law implementation to "better assure our security and personal safety."

In executing such operations the regime may use foreign agents or home bred mercs -- i.e., Academi (formerly, Blackwater) -- or some of the psychotics identified in the military and sheep dipped for clandestine operations.

Of course, the easiest way to ensure chaos and bedlam which could be used to "justify" clamping down on society would be to have, intentionally or unintentionally, a hiccup cutting off the massive entitlement class from their monthly peace donations. Claiming a cyber attack by "right-wing extremists" crippled the distribution network would be like striking a match in a benzine leak.

Anonymous said...

Blue helmets make fine targets.

Bring it!

Edwin III

pointy end out said...

Swift
PERFECTLY said !

Imagine the carnage if all the hunters here in the US were to change thier quary...We KNOW how to camoflage, hide, stalk, and are basically snipers.
Bring it UN !
Bring it and your UN troops will be just that - "UnTroops"

Anonymous said...

UN Blue has no natural analogue so it makes a terrific target that really stands out.

Perhaps not very sporting, but very considerate of them.

William Flatt said...

It amazes me that people still think that the Constitution, which asserts itself as the SUPREME law of the land, would create an exception for treaties negotiated UNDER its' own authority.

In other words, TREATIES DO *NOT* SUPERCEDE THE CONSTITUTION!

But let the U.N. just try to impose their rules here, whether this administration fabricates a pretext or not. To paraphrase the old saying, "U.N. Blue provides maximum contrast for rapid target acquisition". And when that happens, it it not be said years from now that they didn't deserve everything that happens to them as a result!

Ashrak said...

They are dumb, but they are not that stupid.
The only fighting force more dangerous than the US military is the US Citizenry. All the world and all the worlds governments know it. Even our own usurper in chief knows it too

That he and his ilk, the silent speaker included, would have rammed through gun bans and such instantly if they thought for one second they could get away with it.

They didn't do so because they know if they did do nationally they would be firing the shot heard round the world. Instead they try bit by bit instead. That is backfiring as well. Illinois is the bellwether. Watch it closely as June grows closer.

Anonymous said...

From the treaty's own UN Final Conference Report (18-28 March 2013), preamble:

"Reaffirming the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms
exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system,"

They may have to be mentored that words matter and we have some that pre-date theirs.

Roger J said...

I think Canadian peacekeepers could successfully occupy Vermont and Massachusetts, and even be welcomed by many inhabitants. They would be well advised to stay out of Idaho and Montana or they might find their own fed-up people in Alberta and Saskatchewan attacking from the rear, while American patriots took them on this side. As for the usual third world "peacekeepers" the correct term for them is "rent-a-rapist."

Anonymous said...

Went to lunch with my wife & m-in-law the other day. While waiting to be seated, I caught a brief blub (CNN? MSNBC?) on a large screen TV over the bar (noisy), something to the effect that the UN was fielding its first (armed?) troops that were NOT peacekeepers. So the blue helmets may not be a part of the new troops new uniform. Something to keep an eye on.

B Woodman
III-per

Anonymous said...

I have a very simple rule. Anyone who threatens (by their actions - "sticks and stones" etc.) me or mine immediately and irrevocably converts to a target. Only thing I know a target is good for is getting shot at.

Even as bad as my old eyes are getting, those blue helmets or berets would make dandy aim points. How much good do you reckon those cute blue helmets would be against a 150gr FMJBT .30 cal at 2700 ft/sec? What is that quote attributed to IJN Admiral Yamamoto? Something about "a rifle behind every blade of grass"?

Gunny G said...

If I see a blue helmet/beret, I'm just gonna open fire on the spot.

Anonymous said...

There will be no foreign enforcement here. It will be done via taxes, arrests of high profile types, and peer pressure a the private level pushed by public awareness campaigns and impossible threats. Your IRS forms will demand information under penalty of perjury.

johnnyreb said...

@ SWIFT;

I have a feeling they might have a harder time getting Canadian troops to fire on us than some of our own guys.


Dear Bath-house Barry;

Please Please Please Please Please

Please Please Please Please Please

Pretty please,

Let the U.N. send their troops here to try to enforce your agenda.

Anonymous said...

Before we get too comfortable with all euro-peons being cheese eating surrender monkeys the French Foreign Legion has in the past fought under UN control. Their officers are froggish but the men are from every other country. They are genuinely tough motor scooters who nonetheless were ass-kicked in Vietnam and Algeria. By other professional soldiers not by 55-year old armchair commandos. They are professionals on a par with anybody's military. But there are only 7700 of them. So even if the UN sent every kepi blanc the 8 million American firearms owners who would fight are still Team America.