Monday, May 12, 2014

Washington Post editorial board advocates risking NJ gun dealers' lives

But the Washington Post clearly is taking the "threat" seriously, or has at least chosen to appear to do so. That would seem to be rather cold-blooded and callous of them to advocate forcing every New Jersey handgun dealer to choose between going out of business, and engaging in the same behavior that supposedly provokes homicidal rage among people who are presumably armed. Then again, if one believes that the fewer guns in society, the better, as would appear to be the editors' position, perhaps a few dead gun dealers seems an acceptable price.

5 comments:

GaryM said...

Does the WaPo have armed security? Then they should be restricted to Smart Guns. If it doesn't work when needed, well, what's a few authorized journalists here or there.

Mark Matis said...

To quote BATFE Agent Hope McAllister's comment about the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry:

"Collateral damage."

Anonymous said...

How about posting the names and addresses of the WaPo "Journalists" who advocate the dealers' names beibg made public. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Anonymous said...

we need some more reservations

here or somewhere.

Anonymous said...

With or without security, a few less WaPo reporters is acceptable as well.