A man is free to do with his money as he sees fit, to be sure. Yet, financing murder is hardly a freedom.
I personally oppose abortion, in a search for some other alternative to the desired end (not being pregnant". I believe that money would have been better spent trying to find a way to remove a pregnancy from one woman who doesn't want it, implanting it within a woman who does. This solution accomplishes what both "sides" of what the abortion debate truly want - no killing of a viable human life and "not pregnant".
But see, the abortion debate, and buffets billions( like bloomberg regarding guns) isn't about that. To both, it's about seeing dissent In order for government to be all powerful decider. It's about control.
Government can't reach inside a persons skin and decide for the person. If we are not free within our skin then there's no such thing as being free. But we can damn sure make it unarguable what abortion actually is - the literal death and dismemberment of a growing human being. That alone, when faced as truth, will be enough to get women to "choose" something besides that. In SPITE of buffets bucks.
Rumor has it Warren Buffoon was a seed investor in the bloody, murderous abortuary run by Dr. Kermit Gosnell where Buffoon's motto on the wall was "De-exist not Coexist!"
One can tell evil has flourished and reached its fiery maximum when one fully funds the killing of pre-born Homo Sapiens (i.e., the next generation of American worker taxpayers) in the womb where they are first unarmed.
You don't make any sense. First you have a link to a report in the Moonie paper about CIS, a pro abortion group then several items down on the page you condemn abortion as being bad.
5 comments:
A man is free to do with his money as he sees fit, to be sure. Yet, financing murder is hardly a freedom.
I personally oppose abortion, in a search for some other alternative to the desired end (not being pregnant". I believe that money would have been better spent trying to find a way to remove a pregnancy from one woman who doesn't want it, implanting it within a woman who does. This solution accomplishes what both "sides" of what the abortion debate truly want - no killing of a viable human life and "not pregnant".
But see, the abortion debate, and buffets billions( like bloomberg regarding guns) isn't about that. To both, it's about seeing dissent In order for government to be all powerful decider. It's about control.
Government can't reach inside a persons skin and decide for the person. If we are not free within our skin then there's no such thing as being free. But we can damn sure make it unarguable what abortion actually is - the literal death and dismemberment of a growing human being. That alone, when faced as truth, will be enough to get women to "choose" something besides that. In SPITE of buffets bucks.
Rumor has it Warren Buffoon was a seed investor in the bloody, murderous abortuary run by Dr. Kermit Gosnell where Buffoon's motto on the wall was "De-exist not Coexist!"
One can tell evil has flourished and reached its fiery maximum when one fully funds the killing of pre-born Homo Sapiens (i.e., the next generation of American worker taxpayers) in the womb where they are first unarmed.
Bill Gates and his wife are right up there with Buffet.
They sold their soul to Satan.
You don't make any sense. First you have a link to a report in the Moonie paper about CIS, a pro abortion group then several items down on the page you condemn abortion as being bad.
He lives like a King, with the morals of a dog.
Post a Comment