"You know Hillary, I think this Internet Truth Squad is a great idea, but I don't think we're gonna get it in time to help you with the Gunwalker scandal hearings. I think you're pretty much screwed on that. First time in a while, huh?"
FOX News: "Bill Clinton Muses About Creating Internet Agency to Combat Falsehoods."
If Bill Clinton had his way, there would be an Internet agency created by the U.S. government or United Nations to debunk malicious rumors that originate and spread online.
"I think it would be a legitimate thing to do," Clinton told CNBC in an interview that aired Friday. He was interviewed alongside Mati Kochavi, a cybersecurity entrepreneur.
But Clinton added that if such an agency were ever created, it would have to be "totally transparent" about where its funding came from and would have to be independent.
"Let's just say the U.S. did it. It would have to be an independent federal agency that no president could countermand or anything else because people wouldn't think you were just censoring the news and giving a different falsehood out," he said.
"That is, it would be like, I don't know, National Public Radio or BBC or something like that, except it would have to be really independent and they would not express opinions, and their mandate would be narrowly confined to identifying relevant factual errors," he said.
Clinton said the agency would have to have citations so it could be checked in case it made a mistake.
"Somebody needs to be doing it, and maybe it's a worthy expenditure of taxpayer money," he said. "But if it's a government agency in a traditional sense, it would have no credibility whatever, particularly with a lot of the people who are most active on the Internet."
So, I guess if it were funded by George Soros and his ilk, like Clinton's favorite Center for American Progress (from whose rostrum
Bill Clinton denounced the Three Percent and Oathkeepers last 19 April) that would have MORE credibility?
Here's the transcript.
The Gunwalker Scandal began as "a malicious rumor" on the CleanUpATF.org site. There was no proof, only whispers among ATF agents. By Clinton's wish, it would be "debunked" before it could make it into the "mainstream" media. No larger news organization would then touch it since it had been "officially discredited." Now, given who his political partner is, I can understand why the philandering Perjurer in Chief would want that capability. But why should anybody else?