Monday, May 9, 2011

Who knew? I miss a chance to meet Rachel Madcow at the NRA convention.

Meghan McCain (that stalwart gun rights advocate -- insert rolling eyeballs) takes Rachel Maddow to the NRA convention.

Darn.

If I'd run into her I'd ask her why she's not denouncing the Gunwalker scandal. I'm sure she has a really, really good reason.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

13 comments:

TypicalClinger said...

Frankly, I can't bring myself to push play. I just don't care what her ilk has to say anymore. I keep one eye open for any sudden moves on the idiotic left,but other than that they are are the screeching of cats to me. Gibberish nonsense.

Dennis308 said...

Whenever "THEY" say you really don't Need something, That's when you NEED it the most.

Megan is wrong most nra members (that I know)do not support limiting Magazine Capacity.

And Rachel is a Collectivist Liar, That's the nicest way I know how to say it.

Neither understand what is
"A Well Regulated Militia"
"For the Security of a Free State" or "Shall Not Be Infringed". Or in Rachel's case they just don't care.

As written on the Gonzales Flag
"Come and Take it"

Dennis
III
Texas

PS
She's not denouncing "Gun-Walker" because the left understands,
"By Any Means Necessary"

Cederq said...

Mike, I am now upset with you, I chucked all over my flat monitor and keyboard watching this clip, now I have to clean them as best I can.
At first I thought meghan mCcain was talking to a tall, skinny man.
If this mCcain is a stalwart gun rights advocate, she sure is dumber then a fence post about most of the issues and suppressed rights of today. It seemed like I was watching the first awkward opening moments of a date...

Anonymous said...

I watched about half of the video with these two dingbats espousing their baseless logic. I came to the conclusion that if their hands were tied behind their backs, no words would come out of their mouths.
Charlie
III

Anonymous said...

What gun rights measures aren’t insane?

(That's for the Leftist to think about)

Just like taxes, the implication is always made that every new gun grabber initiative is as thought this is the first time this has been tried and that up until this point there has not been ANY KIND OF GUN CONTROL.

Each infringement is always couched as “Reasonable” and “Commonsense” and each infringement DOES NOT HAVE DESIRED EFFECT AS ADVERTISED!

And therefore, the Gun Grabbers come back with yet another as “Reasonable” and “Commonsense” infringement of our rights.

[BTW, News flash for the Left – by definition, Criminals don’t obey the Law]

Osama bin Obama said...

I didn't even know they were a couple. Guess I'm out of the DC power loop.

Anonymous said...

I watched a couple of minutes before I had to shut it off for the sake of my stomach.
What part of "The Right of the People . . . shall NOT be Infringed" do they either not understand - or willfully ignore.
I wonder how many NRA members saw Rachel there and wanted to shoot her, but didn't? Shows remarkable restraint to me.
And none of those evil black rifles, thousands upon thousands of them there in that convention hall, ever jumped up and did anything. Amazing!!
But please! To reduce just one more case of Cruitzfeld-Jacobs disease, please shoot the MadCow.

B Woodman
III-per

Anonymous said...

Tune them out. Buy ammo, buy supplies. Practice, network, exercise and stay closed-mouth. Turn off your TV's, except to get the latest news that may portend a false flag. It's very late in the game. Get prepared.

Anonymous said...

Sickening as always.

Anonymous said...

I think Maddow's true nature was best represented by the color of her shirt. My Grandma used to say these kinds of things were never coincidence...

Anonymous said...

Two miniature female poodles for sale to the right owner.

Anonymous said...

Three quick points.

1. I can't think of anything I've seen on this blog that deserved the "Barking Moonbat" icon more than these two did.

2. You would have to go a long way to find a better example of what the left considers "reasonable" or "common sense".

3. You would probably be surprised/shocked/appalled at the restrictions that the FUDD component of the NRA would consider undesirable but acceptable. Take a look at the bio sketches provided by the recent board candidates. (If you didn't get a copy IMHO you're part of what's wrong with the organization). Four of them didn't even mention The Second Ammendment. Don't think they would roll over if Obama said they could keep "Ole Betsy" if they merely blocked the magazine permanently? Can I interest you in a well maintained but only lightly used bridge?

TPaine said...

A lesbian and a blonde walk into a gun convention...

I'm still waiting for the punchline. And I'd have to ask John McCain if he had any children that lived.

There is no "news" left to print.