Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Collectivist left asks, "Are you sure that the Times Square bomber wasn't a Tea Partier? . . Please?"

Crazed gun-owning Southern white boy Tea Partier from Pakistan.

"If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that," explained New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg -- who has plenty of quarters to spare -- during the investigation's early stages, "homegrown, maybe a mentally deranged person or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything."


While it does not seem at this point that there is proof of Rush Limbaugh's contention that Faisal Shahzad was a registered Democrat (wouldn't that be too choice? -- although he really didn't like George Dubya much), it is certain that the left collectivists really, really, REALLY wish that he was a crazed gun-owning Southern white boy Tea Partier from Pakistan.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

I guess if we dream, they will to.

Anonymous said...

And the more they wish, the more they show their ignorance of the tea party movement. Once again the facts support the history. Tea parties have been peaceful demonstrations of protest. Who again is it that kills innocents indiscriminately? Muslim radicals. Every time and it's documented for hundreds of years. Yet, the LMS speculates and drools at the thought hoping that it's a tea party loony. They will never get it. The tea party people LOVE this country. Muslims do nothing but hate and will do anything to further their sorry excuse for religion. History proves it.

Anonymous said...

if authentic, it seems The Mighty Kenyan is worried about Oathkeepers.

http://www.garynorth.com/public/6443.cfm

Soldiers' privately owned arms & ammo have to be turned "for safekeeping" by the base commander. Written permission needed for off-post arms & ammo.

Apologies if this is a duplicate message from other sources.

Anonymous said...

Maybe he was from south Pakistan?

Well I hope Bloomberg will remember//
Southern Man don't need him around anyhow

Eric
III

D.Schneider said...

Dear Mr. Vanderboegh:Thank-you for your April 19 speech concerning the word "no". I especially enjoyed the part about the reaction of our government to the word no. The U.S. Constitution,too, is about the word no--no nobility(hence no slavery),no standing armies,etc. When U.S. Supreme Court justices tell us no means something other than no (they do all the time) they commit felony perjury and high felony Article III Treason. Those traitors deploy public force to levy war against us, the whole People of the United States. Upon Presentment for Treason properly and openly made, the Militia may use only strength sufficient to secure that no means no.

Anonymous said...

Dennis308,

Had it been done right, that could have been a big boom. The energy contained in the components by weight is approximately equivalent to 750lbs of TNT. Thank god that fool didn't know how to get all that energy out all at once. I don't want to say any more than that, although it may look amateurish, the potential was there.

straightarrow said...

Anonymous said...
if authentic, it seems The Mighty Kenyan is worried about Oathkeepers.


For Christ's sake why? he already scared them away once. The second time you run is easier than the first. I don't think they worry him a damn little bit. Just hold their pensions and perks hostage, they'll fall in line or run away. I mean, if history is any indication.

Unknown said...

Maybe the real point of this incident is that now they have a terrorist with citizenship. Doesn't that give the PTB new avenues to curtail citizens's liberties? Isn't there talk of that already from Liberman? What could they do to citizens simply suspected of terrorism?

Jimmy the Saint said...

@Anonymous: "although it may look amateurish, the potential was there."

Not at all amateurish, at least not at the planning level. Ever try to find parking in Times Square? Difficult to impossible. They had to have someone observing the target building to let them know the *exact* instant a spot was available, and they had to be close enough to get their instantly. Or have someone get a spot and hold it for them.

Otherwise, they could have burned their entire gas supply circling endlessly waiting for one to open.

dennis308 said...

Anonymous the means of detonation is the KEY to go BOOM! Amateurs HA!

Dennis
III
Texas

Rhodes said...

When the bomb failed I knew it wasn't a good ol' boy. These guys better wish they never do run into one of those guys.

Anonymous said...

I'm with JIMMY THE SAINT. More and more is coming out that the feds knew about this guy for years. This smells like a bungled false flag. They need a reason to move against us and seize our arms.

Josey Wales said...

They need a reason to move against us and seize our arms.

May 5, 2010 8:34 PM

You're kidding, right?

They have all the reasons, just not the balls, or the propaganda equivalent.

They know that if they start the ball, we will call the tune.

It's simple numbers... do the math.

WE ARE EVERYWHERE!

They are in DC.

Root, branch and seed. And salt the ground.

Rebel III

Anonymous said...

All this time I thought it was that white paunchy balding guy taking off his top shirt immediately after "supposedly" getting out of his bomb car and walking away and looking back.

I couldn't get a clear picture of his nose ... but I wonder if it was a mo ... op ... Naw.

Anonymous said...

"The thing that supports the false flag operations is that not one bomb has gone off since 9/11. Any raghead in Iraq or Afghanistan can build one in the dark, in a ditch, and yes, many of them do blow themselves up. But hundreds succeed."

I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that our Homeland Security people are on the ball with regards to jihadi bombers, and that many are being intercepted, but they aren't making most of those attempts public. To do so would help our enemies...

Nappy may say stupid things, but she knows that as soon as a bomb goes off in a population center, her career is over. This incident almost accomplished that.

Another thing is that many of the experienced bombers are, in fact, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the US & NATO forces are taking a punishing toll on their numbers.

It's a resources game now: can Al-Queda in Iraq spare Hamdi the pro-bombmaker for a US operation that may take an entire year to plan and millions of dollars to implement?

9/11 only cost $500,000, but that was then, and operations now surely take tremendous resources. Those resources are now being used to supply weapons, ammo, and other support items to the fighters that certainly need them badly.

Another issue is that if they can infiltrate hardcores through the southern border, they better plan a massive op as the Mexican border will get locked down hard and permanently after that. Mexican whining will fall on deaf American ears at that point...

We'll get a wall (or the equivalent), but it'll cost us a city, or at the least many thousands of dead and a massive disruption in our way of life.