The ORIGINAL gathering place for a merry band of Three Percenters. (As denounced by Bill Clinton on CNN!)
O’Reilly once again shows his New York socialist 'state of mind'. Liberal's gun restricting laws do absolutely nothing to stop or even slow the crime rate. Only law abiding and armed American citizens keep the peace, including damping down the political chaos from the left. And we need weapons of the type that WILL make the statist government types RETREAT TO COVER, Mr. O’Reilly! Will enjoy watching your viewership numbers drop.
Fox (Rupert Murdoch) is only as conservative as his money allows him to be. Their agenda is amnesty and anyone for amnesty is against the 2nd amendment and everything else Fox advocates is only to promote their agenda. O’Reilly does what he is paid to do.The GOP establishment is as much responsible for our current mess as anyone on the democratic side and Murdoch has been a supporter of both with his time and resources, don't ya know.
O'Reilly has always touted removing judge's discretion. He knows full well that this attempt (national minimum sentences) is destructive to the three branches. He further refuses to acknowledge that America has three power centers; Feds, States, People and therefore always wants to give more power to the Feds at the expense of the latter two. He is a Nationalist of the Lincoln type. If you are still watching Fox News then you will never understand the systematic brainwashing that this channel conducts over the minds of those ignorant of God's Natural Law and those ignorant of the just laws of men. Turn off the machine and think for yourself.
You're losing your touch Dutchman. You didn't have Julius Streicher's picture inserted for Bill O'Reilly's..But don't worry, we know exactly who is who and O'Reilly is fooling no one except the little old ladies that still watch him.
Most that are educated beyond their intelligence are either politicians, news presenters, or news maker-uppers. He is in lock-step with that herd. If I were ever given a date, a statement on my beliefs would not be the last thing I ever did. Given a date I'd make a difference.
WA Governor Labels a Hundred Thousand Law-Abiding Constituents a “Destructive Force”http://www.ammoland.com/2016/01/wa-governor-labels-law-abiding-constituents-a-destructive-force/
All talk of "reasonable restrictions" on gun ownership have to start from the messy problem of former violent felons who have served their time and are genuinely trying to go straight.These people need guns if they're to survive. Now you can say that you'll hire them armed bodyguards to keep and bear the guns for them, but you need a pair of bodyguards for each such person too provide round the clock protection. So what most judges do when confronted with a felon who has a gun illegally is throw the case out if there isn't any crime beyond possession. That's going to happen no matter what the politics of the judges are if they are human beings who are presented with the relevant facts of the individual's case (which will happen because there are legal advocacy organizations to help felons). Anyone can talk tough about making sure felons never get their hands on guns, but when presented with an individual case of a felon who is trying to go straight and has to deal with pressure from former associates and prison contacts and indifferent or hostile cops, you have to be completely devoid of human compassion before you tell every single felon that they should just let themselves and their family be butchered rather than carry a gun. Some of them should be butchered (with their families), and their pretension of going straight can go to hell. But you put one in front of a judge (and especially a judge and jury) with an advocacy lawyer to spin the story, and they have a pretty good chance of not being meaningfully punished for mere possession.Now ask yourself, who exactly is less deserving of the right to self-defense than a felon?You find that guy, and restrict his gun rights all you want.Just so long as the means you choose to do it actually affects that guy more than everyone else.
Orielly, like Obama and the NRA, wants the right to arms relegated to a state level permission. Guess what?! Donald Trump wants the same thing. Yes the precious Donald Trump wants the same thing. Go ahead Fudds, Vote Trump. Good luck with that. Fools. Absolute fools.
I was stunned into recognizing his statist mentality a decade ago when he interviewed Stuart Rhodes after Katrina. I was disgusted by his assertion that the police were right to confiscate weapons from citizens due to the state of emergency. I had watched him regularly since he started on Fox, but I turned him off after that episode and I haven't watched since. I guess I can thank him for making me aware of OathKeepers.
Haven't taken this FAUX News fraud seriously since I watched his wet kiss interview with ObaMao Apparatchik, then DHS Chief Janet Nepolitano, approx 5 years ago.I've stopped wasting my time with so called conservatives and journalists who bad mouth their own and then suck up to the real enemies of this country. Amazing how much clearer things are when you take the blinders off and start thinking for yourself.
Is anybody still watching FAUX NEWS? Or the Leprechaun? O'Reilly is a fraud - he DID have sex with that woman! "Falaffal" right, Bill? I think the tide is shifting. The only people that still believe this crap are the people who are never going to come to the light. I'm not interested in debating with them or attempting to persuade them. They are fodder. Zombies. They will be engaged and eliminated in the coming civil war.
Bill O is a Hoe.............he is the white male version of Oprah Winfrfrey
Post a Comment