Neither you Larry or Jindal understand what happened in France, had everything to do with Islam.
The problem of radical Islam is the problem of Islam itself.
Many are afraid that if Islam is the problem there can be no solution. That terrifies them. So they do all they can to avoid engaging with the evidence that Islam is the problem.
Islam was born of violence, its core teachings advocate violence. Is Jindal so sorely misinformed, or just playing along with his own version of political correctness.
Last line of the article: "Jindal gets it." No, Jindal doesn't get it. Even "IF" all muslims denounced the Paris attacks, Islam still has multitudes of problems that will never allow it to mesh into civilized society. For example: If a person born in a Muslim household ever wanted to convert to another religion or just leave Islam for any reason, they would be under a death sentence...just for leaving it. Which brings up the reason that "Islam is the fastest growing religion, blah, blah, blah". They breed like rats. Persons born into a Muslim household are Muslim. Forever. Period. For Life. No way out. As the other commenters said, "Islam IS the problem."
Nothing about Governor Jindal's speech is "Hard hitting" or "Brave". It just seems brave because all the other rhetoric is so lame.
"Brave" would be his speech concluding with..."And as Governor of Louisiana, I intend to introduce legislation and State Constitutional Amendments that force assimilation of all those immigrants who wish to live and benefit from living in LA and the US.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, I Careth Not. Bring Your Oxygen Sucking Psychobabble into my house I'll be wanting to Shoot or Stab or Club You. Sooo Sick of Hearing it. We Love We Care We Share. Lets Leave it Right There.
There are 1000s of those denials, not at all hard to find them online.
Here is a latest I just happen to have up in a tab : http://dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/Jan-09/283552-takfiri-groups-offended-prophet-mohammad-more-than-the-cartoons-mocking-him.ashx
The comments here are such BS. Easy counter-examples to every claim. E.g. the 'Muslims' in France are not very, just like the Catholics of France, it is a very secular society. Indeed there are regressive states in the Muslim world. Conflating that with the religion isn't good thinking.
BTW : until recently, All Catholic nuns wore headgear more complex than a scarf, and all women did in the 1200s. Civilization survived.
I am assuming that many of you commenters would decry the erosion of our Rights, and would advocate restoration of a fundamentalist Bill of Rights? Many of the statements above are an echo of the anti- Japanese drumbeat that arose after Pearl Harbor. Do we really want to repeat that national disgrace? The true test of a society is in how the least of it's citizens are treated.
Anonymous at January 17, 2015, 7:56 PM has nailed it. At least in his first two paragraphs. Not sure about the third paragraph, but it is certainly plausible.
12 comments:
Neither you Larry or Jindal understand what happened in France, had everything to do with Islam.
The problem of radical Islam is the problem of Islam itself.
Many are afraid that if Islam is the problem there can be no solution. That terrifies them. So they do all they can to avoid engaging with the evidence that Islam is the problem.
Noooooo. . . . . Islam IS the problem.
B Woodman
III-PER
Islam was born of violence, its core teachings advocate violence. Is Jindal so sorely misinformed, or just playing along with his own version of political correctness.
If you would like to learn about Sharia this book is a must read. I challenge you to read this book.
http://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Traveller-Classic-Manual-Islamic/dp/0915957728
I find most people say they are interested in learning more about Islam and when you say read the Koran or a book like this , it stops no interest.
Last line of the article:
"Jindal gets it."
No, Jindal doesn't get it.
Even "IF" all muslims denounced the Paris attacks, Islam still has multitudes of problems that will never allow it to mesh into civilized society.
For example:
If a person born in a Muslim household ever wanted to convert to another religion or just leave Islam for any reason, they would be under a death sentence...just for leaving it.
Which brings up the reason that "Islam is the fastest growing religion, blah, blah, blah".
They breed like rats.
Persons born into a Muslim household are Muslim. Forever. Period. For Life. No way out.
As the other commenters said, "Islam IS the problem."
Close but no cigar. He came close to the truth but stumbled at the last second. Islam doesn't have a problem, IT is the problem.
Nothing about Governor Jindal's speech is "Hard hitting" or "Brave". It just seems brave because all the other rhetoric is so lame.
"Brave" would be his speech concluding with..."And as Governor of Louisiana, I intend to introduce legislation and State Constitutional Amendments that force assimilation of all those immigrants who wish to live and benefit from living in LA and the US.
Christian, Muslim, Jew, I Careth Not. Bring Your Oxygen Sucking Psychobabble into my house I'll be wanting to Shoot or Stab or Club You. Sooo Sick of Hearing it.
We Love We Care We Share. Lets Leave it Right There.
There are 1000s of those denials, not at all hard to find them online.
Here is a latest I just happen to have up in a tab :
http://dailystar.com.lb/News/Lebanon-News/2015/Jan-09/283552-takfiri-groups-offended-prophet-mohammad-more-than-the-cartoons-mocking-him.ashx
The comments here are such BS. Easy counter-examples to every claim. E.g. the 'Muslims' in France are not very, just like the Catholics of France, it is a very secular society. Indeed there are regressive states in the Muslim world. Conflating that with the religion isn't good thinking.
BTW : until recently, All Catholic nuns wore headgear more complex than a scarf, and all women did in the 1200s. Civilization survived.
I am assuming that many of you commenters would decry the erosion of our Rights, and would advocate restoration of a fundamentalist Bill of Rights? Many of the statements above are an echo of the anti- Japanese drumbeat that arose after Pearl Harbor. Do we really want to repeat that national disgrace? The true test of a society is in how the least of it's citizens are treated.
Anonymous at January 17, 2015, 7:56 PM has nailed it. At least in his first two paragraphs. Not sure about the third paragraph, but it is certainly plausible.
Depends on what the meaning of
IS IS!
Post a Comment