Sent to me with the comment, "Look who supports gun control." Chamberlain-in-a-bow-tie is "disappointed" in us.
Why is this man smiling? Because stupid Fudds are still sending him money in order to sell them out.
Washington state Senate bans openly carried guns in public gallery
Alan Gottlieb, founder and chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said he was disappointed with the behavior of some of the protesters in the House gallery on Thursday.
Some handled their firearms in a way that was not safe and opened the door for lawmakers to react, Gottlieb said.
"I think it hurts our cause and sets us back," he said.
Before the Senate's decision, Gottlieb said his stance on any possible change to the chamber rules would depend on its wording.
"The devil could be in the details," he said. "But I understand the concern. I share it."
Gottlieb was not immediately available for further comment Friday evening.
8 comments:
Gee, that bill banning guns in the gallery is a big surprise.
Yeah, they made their point.
Yeah, they lost more ground.
Yeah, open carry should be legal.
Yeah, sometimes we're our own worst enemy.
I'm not saying to not stand your ground.
I'm saying there may be 'unintended consequences'.
Use your head in this battle or lose it.
Hey! It's completely fair and understandable.
After all. Some of us are "very disappointed" in him. ;-)
There's only one word that instantly comes to mind when I see a picture of this guy with a bow-tie -
BUFFOON!!!
(And no, R&Ring the bow tie won't change anything.)
When battle commenced the first to go was Chamberlin ... a broken man.
Remember history or keep repeating its failures.
The bow tie is the give away.
Nothing else speaks so loudly!
III
Gottlieb is a traitor, his words are those of a traitor and those that follow Gottlieb (starting with David Workman his lap dog) are traitors too.
All of them one day need to find the end every traitor deserves!
If someone "handled firearms unsafely" then let's have SPECIFIC examples and let's see Ummm BRANDISHING charges against them.
The handling unsafely thing is EASY to define in the specific. You see, some like to claim the mere PRESENCE of a firearm is "unsafe" in and of itself.
The only one actually harming "our cause" is Mr GotLies himself.
Hey Mr Gotlies, how come you NEVER pursued Moore, seeing as how Illinois "carry law" not only doesn't include open carry of handguns but also outright bans ALL long gun carriage? Oh and how about the other arms that Moore listed specifically. How is it that Illinois put right back into the code the EXACT language that Moore saw struck down AND YOU JUST DROPPED IT?
Afraid of "too much" success there Mr Gotlies? Hmmmmm,
Anyone giving money to SAF at this point might as well be giving it to Moms Demand Action. In outcome, that's what you are doing anyway.
Sad it is.
Could someone clear something up for me? I notice in the picture that it appears that he's wearing a Midway USA name tag (or whatever)...does that mean that he's supported by them? I'd like to know as I currently shop there and don't want to give them any more of my hard earned money if they support this POS.
Thank you!
"Anonymous"
RE: MidwayUSA & SAF
I guess they are supporting SAF, unless they've bailed since this announcement.
http://www.midwayusa.com/general/press-release/midwayusa-joins-saf-as-bronze-sponsor
Just ordered a mag from them - they're adios muchachos now.
You reap what you sew, and they won't be sewing with anymore of my $$$.
Post a Comment