Friday, July 10, 2015

David Codrea: Oath Keepers Can Take Lead on Protecting Public from Mandatory ‘Smart Guns’

Washington Ceasefire Director and citizen disarmament proponent Ralph Fascitelli says there’s “one thing the president can do now to reduce gun violence,” and Oath Keeper peace officers are in a unique position to bring some rationality into consideration. That’s because his proposal subjects officers to becoming guinea pigs for “smart guns” in the field, and a preemptive refusal can stop such moves before they’re made.

6 comments:

Dakota said...

Well I have to wonder what is in it for David. It will be interesting to see how well David does with the very poorly run and lead Oath Keepers "gang". Oath Keepers couldn't lead a "kiddie parade".....good luck David....keep your eyes open.

Anonymous said...

Those Knuckleheads that think you have to take an oath to keep an oath?? I wouldn't let them lead anything especially after their fiasco at the Bundy Ranch.

Jack said...

FOP will make sure no police officers ever have to worry about carrying a "smart gun" no oathkeeper input is required.

Anonymous said...

Oath Keepers don't think you have to take an additional oath to keep an oath. They just want you to keep the one you swore in service. They do, on occasion, hold oath renewal ceremonies, but that is something the Founding Generation did too. Catch a clue and don't be such a hater.

oughtsix said...

Ralph Fascitelli is missing an 's' in his last name....

Anonymous said...

I am all for GOVERNMENT enforcers having "smart guns". Anything to lessen their ability to enFORCE Government dictates on the people.

Heck, program them to only be fired when fired upon.