They were made to look foolish yet again. The kid they have running the twitter feed tries to get into it with pro gun people on twitter, then can't respond with facts and ends up blocking many people who make good arguments while begging other people to follow them to pump up their follower list.
The latest tactic they keep trying to do is asking other people if they agree with what certain pro gun bloggers may or may not be saying. However, they are the first ones to duck the question on whether they agree with what the originators of their group, along with many like minded people in the anti gun movement such as Brady and Schumer, believe about a citizen having the right to even own a gun or the right to defend themselves.
I think whenever they try this attempt, everyone should focus on asking them if they believe a citizen should own a firearm and if they have a right to defend themselves. If they lie and say yes, then ask why they disagree with so many like minded people in their movement.
I read a couple of their recent twitter exchanges and laughed at how poorly they argued their case. They actually tried to argue the US faces no tyranny whatsoever, despite the fact that the Pres can now indefinitely detain or murder any US citizen he decides, which is pretty much the exact definition of tyranny. Or how they tried to argue that the 2nd amendment is not an individual right, or that only courts decide what laws are constitutional or not, neglecting what Madison and Jefferson explicitly said about nullification and what many of the northern states and WI used explicitly to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act and similar acts that the courts found constitutional that clearly were not.
While I am in total agreement that there should not be any Ft.Sumters or a repeat of Oklahoma City; I see a government prepping for war against Americans. To think they will not use their arms, munitions and plans, is hoping against hope. The government will choose the time and place. What will be the spark? Maybe today. Maybe this election will be their catalyst/excuse. As FDR said, "Nothing in Washington happens by accident". If there were even one investigative reporter left in the MSM, they would have uncovered the governments agenda for planning and making war on American citizens. The MSM is in bed with those who seek a tyrannical government. They are, therefore, the enemy.
The CSGV, like the SPLC, never say a word when it is the government murdering people like Obama drone striking a minority teenage boy based on his secret kill list! You do not hear a peep from them one bit when it is state sanctioned violence because they are a fascist group that loves government violence.
SPLC and CSGV = fascist groups who want citizens disarmed so the government has a monopoly on force and their ideas are enforced at the point of a gun
7 comments:
They were made to look foolish yet again. The kid they have running the twitter feed tries to get into it with pro gun people on twitter, then can't respond with facts and ends up blocking many people who make good arguments while begging other people to follow them to pump up their follower list.
The latest tactic they keep trying to do is asking other people if they agree with what certain pro gun bloggers may or may not be saying. However, they are the first ones to duck the question on whether they agree with what the originators of their group, along with many like minded people in the anti gun movement such as Brady and Schumer, believe about a citizen having the right to even own a gun or the right to defend themselves.
I think whenever they try this attempt, everyone should focus on asking them if they believe a citizen should own a firearm and if they have a right to defend themselves. If they lie and say yes, then ask why they disagree with so many like minded people in their movement.
I read a couple of their recent twitter exchanges and laughed at how poorly they argued their case. They actually tried to argue the US faces no tyranny whatsoever, despite the fact that the Pres can now indefinitely detain or murder any US citizen he decides, which is pretty much the exact definition of tyranny. Or how they tried to argue that the 2nd amendment is not an individual right, or that only courts decide what laws are constitutional or not, neglecting what Madison and Jefferson explicitly said about nullification and what many of the northern states and WI used explicitly to nullify the Fugitive Slave Act and similar acts that the courts found constitutional that clearly were not.
While I am in total agreement that there should not be any Ft.Sumters or a repeat of Oklahoma City; I see a government prepping for war against Americans. To think they will not use their arms, munitions and plans, is hoping against hope. The government will choose the time and place. What will be the spark? Maybe today. Maybe this election will be their catalyst/excuse. As FDR said, "Nothing in Washington happens by accident". If there were even one investigative reporter left in the MSM, they would have uncovered the governments agenda for planning and making war on American citizens. The MSM is in bed with those who seek a tyrannical government. They are, therefore, the enemy.
Anti-government = liberal code word for opposes tyranny
http://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/what-i-saw-at-the-coup/
CSGV = Coalition in Support of Government Violence
The CSGV, like the SPLC, never say a word when it is the government murdering people like Obama drone striking a minority teenage boy based on his secret kill list! You do not hear a peep from them one bit when it is state sanctioned violence because they are a fascist group that loves government violence.
SPLC and CSGV = fascist groups who want citizens disarmed so the government has a monopoly on force and their ideas are enforced at the point of a gun
I do love how when they were asked to provide proof, they backtracked.
OWNED as the kids on the internet would say. They will end up blocking you like they do half the users on twitter at some point.
Post a Comment