Thursday, October 14, 2010

Welcome today to all our .mil folks.

Especially, the army.mils at Fort Huachuca, AZ and Petersburg, VA and the Naval Operational Support Center at Virginia Beach, VA. Hope y'all learn something while you're here.

Mike
III

15 comments:

Defender said...

Current and future Oath Keepers wanting to learn about how to know, love and defend the Constitution as they swore to do, I hope.
That's all we ask. Is it too much?

Brock Townsend said...

Petersburg, VA

Fort Lee. General Lee is weeping for our country.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure am glad that the .mil folks are on our side (the Constitution side) and not the .gov side(tyrants side). Of course, the .gov folks haven't figured that out yet. I have a feeling that when they do - it won't be pretty.

Anonymous said...

Never forget that we, the Patriots, are the bad guys in today's American society.

Be aware that the .gov/.mil guys and the guys with badges will be all over the 3% like flies on the proverbial pile of defecation.

Never trust a guy with a badge. NEVER !

DAN
III

hazmat said...

Still can't get .blogspot stuff on AF computers, which sucks.

But our crack cyber guys will let you get Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and You Bube all you want. Make sense to anyone else?

WarriorClass said...

I wonder how many people that read this site understand just how our founding fathers thought. I wonder if they understand how our country was turned from a republic to an empire under Abraham Lincoln, and that the war that was fought under him was a war by the federal government against the states (all of the states) that they call the civil war? There was nothing "civil" about it. It was all out war against the right to self rule, against civilians, noncombatants, women and children by the first traitor this country has ever seen, a war criminal that rivals Hitler in his evil desires. And now he sits on a throne in memorial. How sick. And you think he was all about freeing the slaves! He was about enslaving us all.

Jefferson and Washington would have hung federal judges that legislate from the bench as traitors to the republic. Any man that would court the vote of women wasn't a man at all and any man that would steal from those that worked would have been spit upon before he was tarred, feathered and hung.

Now we have set before us liberty and slavery; life and death. The rule of law or the rule of men. Choose this day who you will serve. As for me and my house, we choose the Lord, Who in His Wisdom gave us life to choose.

Choose life; even unto death.

WarriorClass
III

Anonymous said...

Brock Townsend:

Amen.

Snaggle-Tooth Jones, The Colorado Confederatarian.

III (Our Third War of Independence)

And Mike, I'm sure those guys looking in are patriots all.

Or if not, maybe at least some of them will be. That would depend on whether or not they have: 1) a sense of history; 2) a conscience; 3) the drive to get a real job.

Anonymous said...

I resent that comment about "crack cyber guys," of which I am. I have not met any "crack cyber guy" that is for it and we constantly make jokes about how we can get there, but not to sites that help us do the job. For your information this came from all the way at the top of .mil. We are all vehemently against it and know the inherent risks of those sites. I personally think that it is fraud, waste, and abuse, of which 80% of the non .mil traffic is.

Witchwood said...

I'm sure am glad that the .mil folks are on our side (the Constitution side) and not the .gov side(tyrants side). Of course, the .gov folks haven't figured that out yet. I have a feeling that when they do - it won't be pretty.

I'd say that's a pretty hefty assumption, and not one I'm willing to bet my life on. Call me a pessimist, but I'll consider .mil part of the establishment until proven otherwise.

Defender said...

Something for our .mil friends to consider:
"FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) - A soldier who recorded the terror of last year's deadly shooting rampage in Fort Hood using his cell phone was ordered by an officer to delete both videos, a military court heard Friday."
Maj. Hasan yelled "Allahu Akbar!" before he started shooting unarmed-by-regulations soldiers standing in line. How embarrassing for the Army if that got out.
Now, military members are being ordered to disclose the make, type and serial numbers of privately-owned guns they keep off-base.

Political correctness is more imporant than servicemembers' LIVES. Think about that, there in your cubicle at Fort Lee, Naval Ops and Langley.

Defender said...

Got an error message, so I'm repeating.

"FORT HOOD, Texas (AP)- A soldier who recorded the terror of last year's deadly shooting rampage in Fort Hood using his cell phone was ordered by an officer to delete both videos, a military court heard Friday."
Word has leaked out that Maj. Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar!" before shooting unarmed-by-regulations soldiers standing in line. Embarrassing for the Army.
As a result of that mass murder, servicemembers are being ordered to disclose the make, model and serial numbers of any guns they own and keep off-post.
That's how much they trust you. Think about that, there in your cubicle at Fort Lee, Naval Ops and wherever.

Anonymous said...

There are us on the .mil side that are IIIpers. I am one. 27 years in and still serving. Eyes on the inside. So to speak. I will honor my oath. If it comes down to it, the guy that cuts your bonds free could be me.........

BA
III

hazmat said...

You wuld be surprises how many in the ranks are serious about their Oath.

Would there be 'Loyalists' in the ranks? Sure. But a good number wouldn't.

BTW, I did a comm check today and .blogspot sites are now accessible from .af machines.

Folks must be careful, though. They don't want to get any 'visits' from the special investigative branches like CID, NCIS or OSI.

Defender said...

http://www.newser.com/story/103023/clinton-aide-wanted-iraq-to-shoot-down-us-plane.html

A Clinton Cabinet member suggested in 1997 that if one of our planes flew low and slow over Baghdad and got shot down, that would be a casus belli (reason to go to war). Wasn't that around the time of the Lewinsky scandal, wink wink?
Not an unmanned aero-drone, either.
They regret that you only have one life to give for political expediency -- I mean YOUR COUNTRY. Ahem.

Anonymous said...

I only access from home. 6 years in, ARNG.

31B