"I wouldn't doubt the editorial board of the NYT is also aware that the policy of the Nazi party was pretty close to what they are recommending, the confiscation of guns -- for the National Socialists so that they could be sure they were only in the hands of those deemed acceptable (not Jews, etc.). To use Orwell's term this time, that would make the NYT 'objectively pro-fascist.'"
4 comments:
No need to join anything, really. Especially a very ineffective gun organization like the NRA. Just be a man. Or a woman. Whichever you are. And reach down inside yourself and find some intestinal fortitude, and do what needs to be done.
This is the POINT of statements and articles and opinion pieces like that - to get people to join the NRA. Without the NRA, people wouldn't be conned into "deals" that are nothing more than gun control. Remember, EVERY "conceal carry license" is GUN CONTROL legislation. Every bit of it. Every one.
Stop being conned. The NRA isn't the defender of the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment, the Constitution itself is! How do you defend the right to keep and bear arms? EXERCISE IT! How do you concede it? Think that funding another lobbyist paycheck and politician is what does so. See the choice yet?
I dumped the NRA. They're too quick to try to meet in the middle with the enemy. How damn pain is the 2nd? I joined the Gun Owners of America. On top of their dues I add the NRA's.
The New York Times has always been facist
Post a Comment