Thursday, July 23, 2015

"Why arming military recruiters after Chattanooga is so legally complicated."

From Texas to Virginia to Arizona to Wisconsin, it keeps happening. Armed civilians are stepping in to stand watch outside military recruiting centers in an effort to protect the service members inside.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

“Dear Gutless Worthless Terrorist Cowards, Meet An American With A Remington”

http://www.weaselzippers.us/229805-gatling-brothers-sing-about-islamic-terrorists-call-them-gutless-cowards/

Anonymous said...

Armed citizens guard recruiters after Tennessee shootings

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20150722/us--chattanooga_shooting-guarding_recruiters-a9bc06147b.html

Anonymous said...

I don't believe they should be armed. Not by law or decree. However they are citizens of the USA and should have the right to protect themselves no mater where they are. We have too much of a problem these days with armed federal employees of all types. Every time we give a little they take the whole lot and create a precedence. Should there be guards? Perhaps. I am all for the people guarding them.

Anonymous said...

Posse Comitatus strikes again.

Anonymous said...


Ohio group plans civil disobedience of Cleveland’s new gun laws

http://www.guns.com/2015/07/23/ohio-group-plans-civil-disobedience-of-clevelands-new-gun-laws/

CruzMissile said...

In North Carolina, the law on carrying weapons exempts military personnel during the performance of their duties. Simple.

Vic