Government-Monopoly-of-Force Advocate Horwitz Sounds The Alarm About "Insurrectionists" Like Me.
The Town the Militia Took Over.
This is no idle threat the chief is making. Kessler is the head of a private militia called the Constitution Security Force (CSF) whose members swear an oath to "respond to the call if... needed to resist tyranny that seeks to destroy our republic." Kessler recruits CSF members at his website ChiefKessler.com, combining his personal and professional identities in one neat little package.
CSF openly affiliates with anti-government extremist groups like Oath Keepers and the "Three Percent" movement, which was founded by former Alabama militia leader Mike Vanderboegh. Vanderboegh made his own headlines in 2010 when he urged supporters to throw bricks through the windows of Democratic offices nationwide following Congress' passage of health care reform. Many offices were vandalized in response, including that of then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.
Later in his screed. Horwitz says:
In 2009, I co-authored a book called Guns, Democracy and the Insurrectionist Idea. In the book, Casey Anderson and I exposed the threat of insurrectionists -- those who believe that they have an individual right under the Second Amendment to shoot and kill elected officials, police officers and military service members in response to what they see as "tyranny." We warned the nation that insurrectionism was anathema to our democratic society and, if allowed to spread, could lead to serious violence.
Some thought our warnings were overblown or alarmist. Even as Congressional offices were vandalized and Gabby Giffords was shot during an assassination attempt, the conventional wisdom held that we were too advanced as a country to succumb to political violence. But now -- out of the same state where rebellious farmers launched the Whisky Rebellion in 1791 -- we have seen the true face of "Second Amendment remedies." A one-man police force and his private militia -- accountable not to the local government, but to him -- appear to have taken over the small town of Gilberton.
Too many of our leaders have indulged insurrectionists as if they were bullying in-laws -- unpleasant but not really dangerous. Mark Kessler has shown us a grimmer reality: How democracy is compromised when access to the political process is blocked through brute intimidation and dissenters become an endangered species. Thanks to the gun lobby and its minions, armed political violence is no longer just something we see in the news in some far away third world country, but a contagion that is beginning to inflict our culture right here in the United States.
In response to the Whiskey Rebellion, the retired General who led our nation to victory in the Revolutionary War literally put his uniform back on, got in his saddle, and physically confronted the "insurgents" threatening our young nation. What is true then is still true today. Our democracy will not survive if we allow "the guys with the guns to make the rules."
In truth, Horwitz wants the guys with the guns to make the rules, only he wants them to be HIS guys -- the FEDERAL government that he explicitly desires to have a "monopoly of force."
18 comments:
Sufferin' succotash! Mike, you're despicable! Keep on keepin' on and keep up the good fight. My prayers for you and your family, Mike. May the Lord grant you many more years of being a thorn in the sides of the progressives.
DixieDennis
I just love it when uniformed people, like Horwitz, do not tell the whole story of the Whiskey Rebellion. It was not a great Washington victory, it was in truth a black eye for the old fart. SCREW YOU Horwitz!
So, 20,000 people signed a petition to get the police chief in a 700 population town fired?
Are any of the 700 residents among the 20,000 signers?
Josh Horwitz said:
"We warned the nation that insurrectionism was anathema to our democratic society ..."
First, America was founded as a Republic, not a Democracy:
The Federalist No. 14
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa14.htm
"The error which limits republican government to a narrow district has been unfolded and refuted in preceding papers. I remark here only that it seems to owe its rise and prevalence chiefly to the confounding of a republic with a democracy, applying to the former reasonings drawn from the nature of the latter.
...
In the first place it is to be remembered that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is limited to certain enumerated objects, which concern all the members of the republic, but which are not to be attained by the separate provisions of any. The subordinate governments, which can extend their care to all those other subjects which can be separately provided for, will retain their due authority and activity."
Second, the right for individuals to defend their liberty, with deadly force, from those in government, is an INTEGRAL part of the American Republic:
The Federalist No. 28
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa28.htm
"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
The Federalist No. 46
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa46.htm
"But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm. Every government would espouse the common cause. A correspondence would be opened. Plans of resistance would be concerted. One spirit would animate and conduct the whole. The same combinations, in short, would result from an apprehension of the federal, as was produced by the dread of a foreign, yoke; and unless the projected innovations should be voluntarily renounced, the same appeal to a trial of force would be made in the one case as was made in the other.
...
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes."
Hokey Smokes! There is too much wrong in this one article of lies, conflation, and forgotten history to answer all at once. Lets just call it as it is - a huge steaming pile of fecal fertilizer. But I do a disservice to fecal fertilizer that's good for the garden.
I presume Mr Horwitz would be happier living under the continued rule of British law, if the insurrectionists of 1776 had NOT risen up as they did? But that's a rhetorical question, I think we know the answer already.
B Woodman
III-per
Oath Keepers pledge to uphold their oath to the Constitution.
Horwitz says Oath Keepers are anti-government.
That says a lot about the government Horwitz wants in place.
Josh Horwitz and his organization are extremists, not members of the groups he puts down. For example, how the hell can oathkeepers be extremist when all they do is affirm again to uphold their oaths to abide by and defend the Constitution?
Horwitz is obviously a real dumbass.
- Old Greybeard
Huh. So if you infiltrate a free Republic slowly, over several generations, bringing more Fellow Travellers along the way, altering in the subtlest manner the policies and regulations within your purview ... building critical mass and accumulating power incrementally such as not to attract attention until you control all levers of power ...
That's different!
To hell with this rat bastard. LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC!
So he stomps his little feet on the ground and pouts. Everyone who defends themselves and/or disagrees with his kind is a meanie or worse yet an "insurrectionist".
This whole thing will only be over when we decide it's over and surrender our personal property and our liberty.
Bring it!
“…armed political violence is no longer just something we see in the news in some far away third world country, but a contagion that is beginning to inflict our culture right here in the United States.”
“In truth, Horwitz wants the guys with the guns to make the rules, only he wants them to be HIS guys -- the FEDERAL government that he explicitly desires to have a "monopoly of force."”
SPOT ON MIKE. SPOT ON
Hi Mike,
That town's about 20 miles south of me & I gotta admit I love it. Mostly this area's a democrat enclave, so much so that if Satan were running for office on that ticket, he'd get elected...the only somewhat bright spot is that this is also the home of Rep.Lou Barletta.
Horwitz wrote a book?
That's the entire purpose of this article....to advertise his book.
He wants to double his sales by getting one more person to buy it.
Wasn't the guy who shot Giffords a dyed-in-the-wool leftist?
Mike, you beautiful insurrectionist and purveyor of the truth of the crisis of legitimacy, you and Claire are featured over to Doug Ross.
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2013/08/americas-ubergovernment-and-rest-of-us.html
Congress, the whitehouse and the vast majority of the courts are under the control of people who are violating the supreme law of the land.
The politicians are the real insurrectionists.
Want to know what a red blooded patriotic insurrecting man of action is like?
Read on...
http://maxvelocitytactical.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-home-invasion-dilemma-discussion.html
http://maxvelocitytactical.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-home-invasion-dilemma-discussion.html
Government-Monopoly-of-Force Advocate Horwitz Sounds The ... emonopoly.blogspot.de
Post a Comment