Saturday, December 15, 2012

Rupert Murdoch shows his ignorance.

"Terrible news today. When will politicians find courage to ban automatic weapons? As in Oz after similar tragedy." Uh, Rupert, they're semi-auto. Nevertheless, such unbelievable ignorance doesn't bode well for the coming legislative fight. I guess we'll have to count on ourselves alone. (Not that I didn't always expect it.)

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sometimes old guys call auto loaders automatics... Or he's dumb.

SWIFT said...

You are so right about the coming legislative fight. I'd almost bet that the legislative and executive branches of government, will postpone the fiscal cliff talks, to take up gun control. This terrible massacre in Connecticut is going to have ramifications beyond what anyone is currently expecting. I foresee a flurry of draconian anti-gun, unconstitutional, legislation. I look for the left-wingers to become so bold, that they will not allow any "grandfather clauses" in the legislation. I'm talking confiscation, then, the inevitable war.

Anonymous said...

None of this matters AT ALL Mike. Obama is just crazy and stupid egnough to issue an executive order to ban guns+ ammo. ONE second later CW-2 IS ON. "We hunt 'em down & kill em all" was the comment I herd at the local G&A.(from a COP!!!) Eather way looks like we'r about to find out.

Yank lll said...

There have been several phrase concerning Weapons Confiscation and Disarming Citizens such as "When they come for your guns kill them, then kill the ones who sent them" and others but maybe its time we added another one to the diatribe to give the Disarmament Scumbags something to ponder. How about this:
"Any attack on one of us will be considered an attack on all of us"

Yank lll

Hefferman said...

No More Ruby Ridges, No More Wacos, an attack on one of us needs to be considered an attack on all of us.
"First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me."
Neimoller
When they come for the first of us, we need to stand up against them. "Either we hang together, or will will all hang seperatly." Franklin

Anonymous said...

Well said Yank III.

But we'd HAVE to stick to it.

Anonymous said...

"Any attack on one of us will be considered an attack on all of us"

It is sad that this has to be suggested up. It should be a given.

Anonymous said...

What we really need is a law to prevent diminutive, wizened, bitchy old Ozzies from owning media conglomerates.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous 2:59, "We hunt 'em down & kill em all", was the "Cop" referring to Firearms owners or the people trying to confiscate the Firearms?

johnnyreb said...

Everybody who gives a flying fuck what Murdoch thinks, raise your hand.

Thought so.

Anonymous said...

The name Rupert Murdoch needs to be added to the Range Cards.

Anonymous said...

So Obama is going to legislate via Executive Orders? I recall he has recently said that if Congress doesn't act, he will.

Why does he think we would accept a Muslim King when we wouldn't even accept an English one?

Anonymous said...

1;17 am , there`s a whoooole ! lot of people thinking the same thing . This is going to get to the point were the masses are going to refuse to recognize this government`s authority . GOD help us. Civil War / Revolution , is imminent.

Yank lll said...

" Anonymous Anonymous said... Well said Yank III.
But we'd HAVE to stick to it."

Do we have any other choice ?
..its either that or surrender everything, put on the chains and become good little comrades of mullah Obama and his new world order.

Not Likely.
Yank lll