"What upsets the couple most is their belief that U.S. law enforcement could have stopped the sale of a gun used to kill their son."
Mike, if you speak with Sharyl, please do your best to get her to just say it like it is. The ATF let it walk. On purpose.
Mrs. Attkisson's pieces have been helpful in getting the story some mainstream exposure, but I honestly think that this article is more harmful than helpful. It implies that gunwalking was an oversight; while we know that it was a deliberate strategy.
If the botch narrative wins, Holder will not go to jail and will likely keep his job.
2 comments:
They didn't know about it at the time? It was facilitated!
Or are they trying to say "We didn't know, at the time, that the weapon was going to be used to kill Jaime..."
Or more exactly, "We thought they would only use those guns to shoot other Meskins..."
"What upsets the couple most is their belief that U.S. law enforcement could have stopped the sale of a gun used to kill their son."
Mike, if you speak with Sharyl, please do your best to get her to just say it like it is. The ATF let it walk. On purpose.
Mrs. Attkisson's pieces have been helpful in getting the story some mainstream exposure, but I honestly think that this article is more harmful than helpful. It implies that gunwalking was an oversight; while we know that it was a deliberate strategy.
If the botch narrative wins, Holder will not go to jail and will likely keep his job.
Post a Comment