Sunday, September 6, 2009

The rush on firearms is slacking off for the moment. The rush on ammo? Not so much.

Somewhere in the hills of (REDACTED) County, Alabama, a Dogtown Rangers working party adds a few more cases to "Mad Bob's" secret basement cache.

Another tip from the apparently all-seeing, all-knowing typeay, with my thanks. You'll find the link to this story from the Las Vegas Review-Journal here.

It is plain that the rush on firearms is slacking off for the moment. The rush on ammo? Not so much. This is not because of the political threat to supply of future laws, I think, but rather stems from the sensible notion that --

a. In any country that is currently trying to print its way out of a big hole by digging a deeper one in monetizing the debt, it is property, real property, THINGS, that will hold their value more than paper money, and

b. That this policy insanity (and other Obamanoid stupidities) can only lead to societal degradation, even breakdown, i.e. to a tidal wave of crime posing an existential threat to all.

Therefore, these folks are doing the smart thing. They are stocking up on something that holds its value, no matter what disasters befall us.

"Purty smart, if'n you ask me," says "Mad Bob."

Mike
III



Sep. 06, 2009


The hunt is on for more ammunition in Nevada, U.S.


Supply can't keep up with demand, a trend that began after election


By MIKE BLASKY
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

With nationwide demand for firearm ammunition outstripping manufacturers' supply, empty shelves in Nevada gun stores have some consumers sweating bullets.

On delivery days at the Bass Pro Shop in the Silverton, 20 to 30 customers will line up for the store to open, said Keith Rainey, an assistant manager in the hunting department.

"They call us up every day to find out when the next load is coming in," Rainey said. "If you don't get there early, you don't get any bullets."

John Lowrie, a sales representative at Discount Firearms on Highland Drive, said it's the same in every store.

"We don't even stock to-go ammo on our shelves anymore. We get just enough to keep our range running," Lowrie said.
Lowrie said even the big retailers are hit-or-miss.

"If you go to Wal-Mart you've got two hours after they unload until they're basically cleaned out," he said.

The shortage applies to all calibers, but the hardest to stock has been for handguns, Rainey said.

Specifically, ammunition for your general "home protection" rounds.

"From the .380 up to the .45, those are the hardest to get," Rainey said. "Everybody in the world is looking for those."

A NOVEMBER TO REMEMBER

The scarcity of ammunition is part of a trend that began immediately after the presidential election, retailers say.

Gun enthusiasts, concerned with perceptions that Barack Obama and a Democrat-controlled Congress would increase gun control measures, began buying firearms and ammunition at an astounding rate.

Because sales rose so quickly, manufacturers struggled to meet the new demands, said Ted Novin, director of public affairs for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms and ammunition industries.

"I'm in daily contact with manufacturers, and they're all at full capacity," Novin said. In other words, as much supply as can be produced, they're producing it.

According to the Department of the Treasury's most recent Firearms and Ammunitions Excise Tax Collection Report, firearm and ammunition manufacturers paid $109.8 million in excise taxes in the first quarter of 2009, up 43 percent from the same quarter in 2008.

All manufacturers are required to pay a 10 or 11 percent excise tax on firearms and ammunition produced, which makes the tax one of the most reliable ways to track firearm and ammunition sales in the United States, Novin said.

A second key indicator is the FBI National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS Checks.

In November, NICS checks were up 41.6 percent versus November 2008, and have been up month-to-month since the election, indicating that firearm sales are still booming.

"Those numbers are beyond outrageous when you consider the recession," Novin said.

A TEMPORARY PROBLEM

Although demand is extraordinarily high, and manufacturers are running at full capacity, more plants haven't been opened to supplement the need.

The reason, analysts say, is because manufacturers don't believe the demand is being driven by natural economic need, but something else.

"It's customer paranoia," Rainey said, "in our new president."

Novin said that is the general sentiment among manufacturers.

Setting up a new manufacturing plant is both costly and difficult; ammunition and firearms are two of the most highly regulated products in the world, he said.

And because the demand is being driven by political concerns, manufacturers are not eager to pull the trigger on what most consider to be a temporary phenomenon.

"That's a good reason not to just set up shop and go through the extraordinary process and expense that comes with building another plant," Novin said. "And in a year or two, when things slow down, there's a good chance they'd have to shut it down."

Al Russo, a spokesman for Remington, said the company has added an extra shift for workers and is doing everything possible to keep up with demand.

He declined to speak about specific business strategies.

"To build an ammunition plant takes a lot of money, and that's as simple as I can put it," Russo said.

One of the misconceptions about the ammunition shortage is that increased demand from the military has shifted production priorities away from the commercial industry, Russo said.

That's largely myth. The military uses its own manufacturers, for the most part, and only a few "double dip" in both arenas, he said.

"They basically buy it from themselves," Russo said. "There's a big difference between commercial and military ammunition."

Novin concurred: "I can tell you with certainty that this demand is completely driven by consumers," he said.

SECOND AMENDMENT COSTS

Even with a nationwide shortage, retailers and manufacturers say they haven't seen a drastic increase in prices.

Lowrie and Rainey said prices in their stores have remained stable over the past eight or nine months, and Russo said Remington hasn't raised prices.

The only place costs have skyrocketed have been at gun shows, where sellers have jacked up prices to take advantage of the paranoia, said Robert Smith, president of the Nevada State Rifle & Pistol Association.

At a Reno gun show in April, Smith said people were hauling out bullets on hand trucks.

"It was a feeding frenzy," he said. "People were stacking boxes of ammunitions, five or 10 cases at a time, paying two or three times more per box."

The demand at the gun shows has gone down since the high point in April, Smith said, but the tension is still high.

"Liberals are talking about restricting types of ammo, reinstituting the assault weapons ban," he said. "So people keep stocking up."

Outside the Las Vegas Gun Show at Cashman Center on Saturday, Craig Brown of Las Vegas was one of those doing the stocking, in the trunk of his car. Brown said he bought as much 9 mm ammunition as he could afford, which tallied almost $300 worth, he said.

Brown said he often has trouble finding ammunition from retailers, which is why he decided to buy more than usual on Saturday.

"I figured that I may as well do it all at once," he said. "I probably paid a little more ... But otherwise it's been a hassle."

Novin said there has been anecdotal evidence to show that supply is beginning to catch up with demand.

A lot of it is because manufacturers have been working at full capacity for several months, he said.

"We're hearing (demand is) slowing down out here (on the East Coast)," Novin said.

And without significant legislation from Congress, the "paranoia" may have worn off a bit, he said.

But in Nevada, a gun-friendly state, consumers have yet to see the shelves being replenished, Brown said.

"Maybe someone could show me where to go to get bullets," he said.

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Accuracy in Media's Expose' and Analysis of Comrade Van Jones.

This is what a Czar used to be. This is Nicholas the Second of Russia. He was killed by communists, along with his entire family.

This is what they call a "Czar" today. This is Van the First of the Realm of the Green Jobs. He IS a communist. My how the world turns. Now we got communists for czars? Only in Obama Land.

My thanks to Jacki J. for forwarding this link. Be sure and go there and read all the supporting links. I have and the footnotes seem solid. Whether it threatens the Obama presidency is another question, but the story sure is illuminating.

Mike
III

Van Jones Scandal Threatens Obama Presidency

AIM Column | By Cliff Kincaid | September 5, 2009

Our media have been slow to grasp the significance of the Van Jones story.

Reporting from near the home turf of embattled Green Jobs Czar Van Jones, Joe Garofoli of the San Francisco Chronicle says it's clearly a bad sign when White House flak Robert Gibbs is asked if Jones still enjoys the confidence of the President and merely replies that Jones "continues to work in this administration."

But the White House has to know that, if Jones goes, the questions won't end. Who appointed him? Who looked into his background? Who knew what and when?

Gibbs knows that the Jones controversy undermines confidence in the President, who bears ultimate responsibility for the appointment. Gibbs also has to know that, if Jones' background can sink Jones, the President himself is in trouble. Obama has decades of friendly associations with communists and terrorists, ranging from Communist Party USA member Frank Marshall Davis in his youth in Hawaii to communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn in Chicago when he was doing community organizing and running for political office.

By comparison to Obama, when it comes to nefarious connections, Jones is a piker.

Curiously, it's not Jones' communist background which has proven to be the most controversial. Rather, it's his two apologies in a week for statements calling Republicans "assholes" and having signed a 9/11 truth statement blaming the terrorist attacks on U.S. officials.

It's the communism, stupid.

As Professor Paul Kengor points out, "We now know that even the most authoritative sources, such as the seminal Harvard University Press work, The Black Book of Communism, were conservative when estimating only 100 million deaths at the hands of communist governments. The latest research, for instance, claims that Mao Zedong alone was responsible for the deaths of at least 60-70 million in China, and Joseph Stalin alone may well have killed 60 million in the USSR-those are just two communist countries that managed to far surpass the entire combined death toll of World War I and II, the two worst wars in the history of humanity."

Do we want adherents of this foreign ideology of mass murder holding high government positions?

Van Jones, of course, is only a symbol of the problem. And communists are not required to promote communist policies. The Obama Administration is pursuing the destruction of anti-communist Honduras, in order to please Hugo Chavez, the Marxist ruler of Venezuela currently on a friendly visit to terrorist Iran. This is a scandal that deserves at least as much attention as Van Jones' communist connections.

Our media have been slow to grasp the significance of the Van Jones story. Some news outlets have only reluctantly covered it because of the Jones statements about Republicans and 9/11.

But Jones' communist background has been known since April 6, when New Zealand blogger Trevor Loudon revealed it in striking detail. This was only a few weeks after the appointment was announced. Joseph Farah's World Net Daily then picked up the story and ran several important follow-ups.

While the Jones appointment has now become both a White House and Democratic Party scandal, one prominent Republican has already gotten burned as a result of her association with the identified communist.

Meg Whitman, the former president and CEO of eBay who is running for Governor of California, has been forced by the controversy to disavow her previous comments in support of Jones. She says, "My husband and I met him and many others on a cruise sponsored by National Geographic and The Aspen Institute. He talked about supporting job growth in California, but of course I did not do a background check of his past over dinner."

Look who else was on the "Arctic Expedition for Climate Action 2008" cruise with Jones:
Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
Larry Brilliant, Director, Google.org
President Jimmy Carter & Rosalynn Carter
Senator Tom Daschle & Linda Daschle
John Fahey, President, National Geographic
Mike Finley, President of the Turner Foundation
Walter Isaacson, President, the Aspen Institute
Andy Stern, President, Service Employees International Union
R.E. "Ted" Turner, Chairman, Turner Foundation, Inc.
Governor Bill Ritter, Jr., Governor, Colorado

You can find the complete list of participants here.

On March 27, 2009, the Aspen Institute gave its Energy and Environment Award in the category of "Individual Thought Leadership" to Van Jones.

Although Whitman now says that she wasn't able to do a background check on Jones over dinner, she had previously said that she "got to know him very well."

Here's what she said, in comments captured on You Tube: "There's a guy over in Oakland, I think his name is Van... Jones. And he and I were on a cruise last summer in the Arctic for climate change. And I got to know him very well. And a lot of the work he's doing to enfranchise broader communities I'm a big fan of. He's done a marvelous job... I'm a huge fan of his. He is very bright, very articulate, very passionate. I think he is exactly right."

For someone who "got to know him very well," she seemed to have some trouble remembering his name. In any event, while Whitman endorsed Jones and his work, at least she didn't hire him. The White House did.

According to the Van Jones website, "In March 2009 Van went to work as the special adviser for green jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality." What does this phrase "went to work" really mean?

As we have previously reported, the Obama Transition Project developed a 7-page questionnaire of 63 questions for people seeking top administration jobs. Here are some of the questions:
Briefly describe the most controversial matters you have been involved with during the course of your career.
Please identify all speeches you have given. If available please provide the test [sic] or recordings of each such speech or identify any recordings of speeches of which you are aware.
If you have ever sent an electronic communication, including but not limited to an email, text message or instant message, that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-Elect if it were made public, please describe.

The final question 63 was all-encompassing: "Please provide any other information, including information about other members of your family, that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the president-elect."

But it's not known if Jones ever filled out the questionnaire. It seems doubtful.

The New York Times said that for those who managed to fill out the questionnaire and clear those hurdles, "the reward could be the job they wanted. But first there will be more forms, for security and ethics clearances from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Office of Government Ethics."

So was Jones subjected to a security investigation by the FBI? No one seems to know. It seems doubtful.

I went to the website of the Office of Government Ethics, which collects and posts "Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Reports or Other Covered Records." I put the name "Van Jones" into the search engine and "0 records" turned up.

It turns out that this data base only includes individuals "nominated or appointed by President Obama with the advice and consent of the Senate." Since Jones didn't have to go through a Senate confirmation hearing, he didn't have to complete any of these forms.

The President, of course, didn't have to fill out those forms, either. He didn't have to go through an FBI background check. So the same questions being asked about Van Jones can be asked about Obama. Van Jones and his supporters know it. They probably know more about the President than we do. And that gives them political leverage and potential blackmail material.

As we argued in a previous column, it appears that a Communist Party spin-off, the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS), was instrumental in some way in getting Jones his job. A one-time secret member of this network, Rep. Barbara Lee, is a close friend of both Jones and Obama. Jones comes from Oakland, California, and Lee represents Oakland. They worked together on the "green jobs" issue before Jones "went to work" at the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Lee hailed the Jones appointment.

Another key CCDS official is Carl Davidson, a Marxist and former SDS activist described by blogger Trevor Loudon as "a big fan and promoter of Van Jones' work." Indeed, the latest edition of the "CCDS Mobilizer" notes that Davidson participated in New York City's annual "Left Forum" in April of this year where he "presented Van Jones' program for Green Jobs for inner city youth, but framing it as a larger structural reform project that could, if done right, unite a progressive majority and help get us out of the current crisis."

In other words, the "Green Jobs" project is a disguised form of socialism.

Loudon reports that Davidson has pushed Van Jones and his agenda at every opportunity-just as he was pushing Obama as a political candidate in the 1990s. "Davidson was an ardent supporter of Obama for several years and helped organize the famous peace rally in Chicago in where Obama pinned his colors to the anti-Iraq war cause," Loudon explains.

If you go to the CCDS website, you'll see that one of the speakers at the recent CCDS convention was Angela Davis, former CPUSA candidate for vice president. I saw a picture of Davis on the first floor of the Ella Baker Center in Oakland when I was there in April looking into the Van Jones controversy. Jones founded the Ella Baker Center.

Rep. Lee, in her book, Renegade for Peace & Justice, talks about her work as "Comrade Barbara" in the Black Panther organization with Angela Davis, "the noted African American member of the Communist Party." Davis was a key endorser of the July 17-19, 1992, national CCDS conference, "Perspectives for Democracy and Socialism in the '90s." One of the topics was, "Toward a Socialist United States?" Jones spoke to a CCDS fundraiser in 2006.

It is becoming increasingly clear that the scandal threatens not only the job of Van Jones but the Obama presidency.

The evidence suggests that a communist network has a direct pipeline into the White House. It is a network that includes the President himself.

So how can Obama fire Jones without putting his own presidency in jeopardy? This is the dilemma that grips the White House.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at cliff.kincaid@aim.org

Priceless. I'll bet Chucky Schumer doesn't go to THIS synagogue.



Thanks to thedweeze for forwarding this priceless gem.

Mike
III

TEMPLE OF BOOM: Rabbi Gary Moscowitz (far right) leads fellow heat-packing holy men in a self-defense drill at a Queens synagogue.

Go ahead, make my high holiday

Mazel-tough guys gunning for terrorists

By REUVEN FENTON and ANDY GELLER
Posted: 3:16 AM, September 4, 2009

It's high noon for the high holidays.

Fearing jihadists will attack synagogues during Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, a group of badass rabbis has developed a program to turn your average shul-goer into a lean, mean fighting machine.

The group, which calls itself the International Security Coalition of Clergy, was founded by Rabbi Gary Moscowitz, who boasts a black belt in karate, teaches martial arts and was an NYPD cop for nine years.

He's teaching others basic and advanced fighting moves -- how to take down a terrorist by the neck, how to use a table as cover from gunfire and how to execute a nifty running somersault while drawing a gun -- that he says can be used by Jews if they're attacked by terrorists during prayer.

"Jews are not like Christians," Moscowitz said. "If I turn my cheek, I'm coming around to make a kick."

Moscowitz said he doesn't think Muslims in general are a threat, but "extremist groups are."

"We're just worried about the safety of the houses of worship that are being threatened with rhetoric on regular basis and extremism," the 52-year- old rabbi said.

Moscowitz said few people took him seriously until May, when the FBI busted homegrown Muslim terrorists for allegedly plotting to blow up synagogues in The Bronx.

Since then, he said, his phone has been ringing off the hook and he created a 100-hour course for synagogue self-defense.

Moscowitz said NYPD officers aren't qualified to guard synagogues because they don't know members of the congregation.

"A terrorist could put a yarmulke on, say, 'Happy holidays,' and blow the place up," he said.

NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said the rabbi had been fired in the early 1990s from the force, but didn't know details. Asked about Moscowitz's criticism of the NYPD, Browne opted for a biblical-like statement.

"Blessed are the tight of lip," he said, "for they shall resist speaking ill of the ill-informed."

The Political Cannibal Just Before the Appetizer.

Thanks once more to typeay, this time for forwarding this Crimestoppers photo from the Ventura County Star.



The Star's caption:

An altercation begins between William Rice, right, in khaki shirt and olive shorts, and an unidentified man wearing black, who authorities say bit off Rice’s little finger. Anyone with information about the biting incident is asked to call Crime Stoppers at 800-222-TIPS.


Typeay writes:

Let's help put the police right onto Mr. Finger-Biter. Somebody knows who, and where, this punk is.


Indeed. Be sure and wear Hellstorm assault gloves if you decide to approach him. He can't chew his way through those.

Mike
III

Hellstorm assault gloves. Guaranteed cannibal proof, or your money back!

"Obama, the Mortal"? Perhaps, but this cornered rat could be supremely dangerous.

Icarus falls to earth.

Charles Krauthammer, writing at RealClearPolitics tells us that Obama the Lightworker has now been revealed to have feet of clay, that he is, in fact, mortal for all to see. Perhaps. My comment follows.

Mike
III

September 4, 2009

Obama, The Mortal

By Charles Krauthammer

WASHINGTON -- What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down further than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post-Nixon pardon)?

The conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by farming out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership. But the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chavista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter Jeremiah Wright?

But forget the character witnesses. Just look at Obama's behavior as president, beginning with his first address to Congress. Unbidden, unforced and unpushed by the congressional leadership, Obama gave his most deeply felt vision of America, delivering the boldest social democratic manifesto ever issued by a U.S. president. In American politics, you can't get more left than that speech and still be on the playing field.

In a center-right country, that was problem enough. Obama then compounded it by vastly misreading his mandate. He assumed it was personal. This, after winning by a mere seven points in a year of true economic catastrophe, of an extraordinarily unpopular Republican incumbent, and of a politically weak and unsteady opponent. Nonetheless, Obama imagined that, as Fouad Ajami so brilliantly observed, he had won the kind of banana-republic plebiscite that grants caudillo-like authority to remake everything in one's own image.

Accordingly, Obama unveiled his plans for a grand makeover of the American system, animating that vision by enacting measure after measure that greatly enlarged state power, government spending and national debt. Not surprisingly, these measures engendered powerful popular skepticism that burst into tea-party town-hall resistance.

Obama's reaction to that resistance made things worse. Obama fancies himself tribune of the people, spokesman for the grass roots, harbinger of a new kind of politics from below that would upset the established lobbyist special-interest order of Washington. Yet faced with protests from a real grass-roots movement, his party and his supporters called it a mob -- misinformed, misled, irrational, angry, unhinged, bordering on racist. All this while the administration was cutting backroom deals with every manner of special interest -- from drug companies to auto unions to doctors -- in which favors worth billions were quietly and opaquely exchanged.

"Get out of the way" and "don't do a lot of talking," the great bipartisan scolded opponents whom he blamed for creating the "mess" from which he is merely trying to save us. If only they could see. So with boundless confidence in his own persuasiveness, Obama undertook a summer campaign to enlighten the masses by addressing substantive objections to his reforms.

Things got worse still. With answers so slippery and implausible and, well, fishy, he began jeopardizing the most fundamental asset of any new president -- trust. You can't say that the system is totally broken and in need of radical reconstruction, but nothing will change for you; that Medicare is bankrupting the country, but $500 billion in cuts will have no effect on care; that you will expand coverage while reducing deficits -- and not inspire incredulity and mistrust. When ordinary citizens understand they are being played for fools, they bristle.

After a disastrous summer -- mistaking his mandate, believing his press, centralizing power, governing left, disdaining citizens for (of all things) organizing -- Obama is in trouble.

Let's be clear: This is a fall, not a collapse. He's not been repudiated or even defeated. He will likely regroup and pass some version of health insurance reform that will restore some of his clout and popularity.

But what has occurred -- irreversibly -- is this: He's become ordinary. The spell is broken. The charismatic conjurer of 2008 has shed his magic. He's regressed to the mean, tellingly expressed in poll numbers hovering at 50 percent.

For a man who only recently bred a cult, ordinariness is a great burden, and for his acolytes, a crushing disappointment. Obama has become a politician like others. And like other flailing presidents, he will try to salvage a cherished reform -- and his own standing -- with yet another prime-time speech.

But for the first time since election night in Grant Park, he will appear in the most unfamiliar of guises -- mere mortal, a treacherous transformation to which a man of Obama's supreme self-regard may never adapt.


Perhaps. But this is the email I sent Krauthammer:

The turning point, certainly, but turning in which direction? Do you suppose that these people, having achieved their life-long dream, will go gently into that political night? If the magic has evaporated, the gloved fist may appear.

Politicians may be blackmailed, incidents fabricated, Reichstags burnt, elections stolen. Don't celebrate Obama's falling poll numbers and apparent loss of control. His psychology alone suggests that this cornered rat could be supremely dangerous.


7 employees dead, 14 injured in explosion at Prvi Partizan



From typeay comes the sad news of a fatal explosion in the Serbian Prvi Partizan ammunition factory.

His comment:

Prayers for the family and friends of those killed or injured. Prvi is one of the main ammunition suppliers still shipping brass cased, boxer primed, reloadable, high-quality ammunition to the USA. It is an excellent, accurate product. I've shot "more than my share" of Prvi. Stand by for supply speed bumps in the ammo market, yet AGAIN.

I second typeay's call for prayers for the victims, and his praise for the quality of Prvi's product.

More selfishly, I also wince at what effect this will have on the continuing ammo shortages and high demand here.

Mike
III

The original article he sent me:

7 dead, 14 injured employees in explosion at Prvi Partizan

04. September 2009. | 07:26 09:31

Source: EMportal, Beta

At least 7 people have died and 14 injured in an explosion at a munitions factory ‘Purvi Partizan' in the Serbian town of Uzice.An investigation into the incident had been launched to determine the cause of the series of explosions.

Four explosions ripped through the Prvi Partizan munitions factory in the evening of Sept. 3, killing seven people, stated the assistant interior minister in charge of emergency situations, Predrag Maric.

At least 14 ipeople were injured in the blast and they are not in a life threatening condition.

The fire that followed the explosions has been localized, Maric said. According to BETA's correspondent in Uzice, the fire brigade received the call at 9:20 p.m. Unofficial sources have said that the explosion took place in the gunpowder propellant production unit.

Serbian Interior Minister, Ivica Dačić, stated that the Uzice explosion happened in four underground tunnels of the factory at 21:30 local time, tanjug news agency reported.

An investigation into the incident had been launched to determine the cause of the series of explosions.

Prvi Partizan, which employs around 600 people, has been Serbia's major ammunition factory for 80 years, producing military and hunting ammunition as well as gun powder and explosives.



A follow-up story:

Five arrested in connection with Prvi Partizan explosion

05. September 2009. | 16:35

Source: Tanjug

In a statement to Tanjug news agency, Dacic said that the five employees have been arrested on suspicion of criminal negligence which put safety at risk.

Serbian First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior Ivica Dacic said today that the results of the investigation held into the explosion that took place at the Prvi Partizan munitions factory killing seven workers show that negligence was the cause of the explosion and five factory employees have been arrested.

In a statement to Tanjug news agency, Dacic said that the five employees have been arrested on suspicion of criminal negligence which put safety at risk.

It is suspected that they did not follow safety protocols while handling dangerous substances which led to the loss of life and property.



Here is the general importer of Prvi Partizan for the US:

TR&Z USA TRADING CO
2499 Main Street
Stratford CT 06615
Phone: +1 203 375 8544
Fax: +1 203 375 8547


And this is Wikipedia's background description:

Prvi Partizan is a Serbian ammunition manufacturer. They produce ammunition in a variety of calibers in various loadings. Founded in 1928[1], they continue to produce ammunition for civilian and military consumers[2]. Their products are available worldwide, including in the United States[3]. Several ammunition articles list Prvi Partizan as one of the few sources of certain unusual cartridges, such as the 7.92x33mm Kurz cartridge used in the StG 44 rifle, and the 7.65x53 Belgian/Argentine Mauser cartridge. In early 2009, Prvi Partizan introduced the 8x50mm Lebel, becoming the first commercial manufacturer in decades to produce it.

Prvi Partizan cartridges carry the headstamp "ППУ"[4]("PPU"), which stands as abbreviation of factory's name in Cyrilic letters, "Први патризан Ужице" ("Prvi partizan Užice"). Prvi Partizan has made ammunition with the head-stamps PP and PPU[4]. The company also makes commercial ammunition for export to Australia, where it is sold under the Highland AX brand.

Prvi Partizan has formed a partnership with the Wolf Ammunition of Russia, manufacturing the "premium" Wolf Gold line.

Ron Paul has CFR worried over Fed? Can we now call him "Black Helicopter Ben" Bernanke?

"NEW! Now Ben's Helicopter Comes in BLACK!"

My thanks to Virginia for forwarding this link from Stephen Yates.

Playing to conspiracy stereotype, the Council on Foreign Relations journal "Foreign Affairs" is clucking its tongue in alarm at little old Ron Paul:

"Congress' ire cuts across party lines, but it has been crystallized by Ron Paul (R-Tex.), an extreme libertarian and longtime foe of the Fed. He has, incredibly, persuaded almost two-thirds of the House of Representatives to co-sponsor a bill that would jeopardize the Fed's independence. The bill is titled, innocently enough, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, which sounds like something everyone should favor. In fact, many have long advocated greater Federal Reserve transparency. And, incidentally, the Fed has become substantially more transparent over the past decade, such as by issuing explanatory statements with each policy decision and revealing more about its internal economic forecasts.

But the cutting edge of the Paul bill is not a call for more transparency; it is a proposal to subject the Fed's decisions on monetary policy and its dealings with foreign central banks and foreign governments to audit by Congress' Government Accountability Office (GAO). Up until now, these activities have been explicitly exempted from audit by the U.S. legal code."


So what does the Council on "Foreign Relations" care about the Fed's transparency? You'd almost think there was a black helicopter lurking somewhere nearby. Maybe now we should address him as "Black Helicopter Ben" Bernanke?

Mike
III

"We allowed ourselves to be shoved back, grumbling, EVEN AS WE HELD THE INSTRUMENTS OF OUR LIBERTY IN OUR OWN HANDS."


My thanks to Amish Tom (a low bow and broad flourish of the boonie hat) for bringing this post at FactsNotFantasy ("Gun Grabbers are On The Move Again") to my attention. In commenting upon it, I restated the principle of the Three Percent more succinctly than I have in the past, I think. (David Codrea keeps telling me how I do drone on.)

Mike
III

My comment:


There was a bumper sticker back in the 70s, "When guns are outlawed, I'll be an outlaw."

The law exists to provide a framework for ordered liberty. Rights are God-given and inalienable (see Declaration of Independence). The rule of law, as expressed by the Founders in the Constitution while sometimes ill-expressed and inefficient, is far preferable to the rule of man.

The Obamanoids (like Dubya and the Clintonistas before them) are far more interested in the rule of man than the rule of law, hence their tearing up of contract law in the auto "bailout" as well as their thirst for gun control.

Amish Tom's post above about the law is harshly stated but unfortunately correct, for as Hobbes observed "a contract without swords" is meaningless. Which is why the Founders inserted that pesky Second Amendment.

Now, the danger here, as it always has been in every trans-tyrannical period in human history, is waiting too long because you're used to doing things "legally" when the tyrant has seized control of the legal system and perverted it to his own ends.

Hitler was "legally" installed in power and quickly began using the Weimar Republic's legal system against it. Gun registration lists, for example, and police files on specific enemies. (Can you say "PATRIOT Act"?)

The anti-Nazi Germans, mesmerized by "the law" and waiting for orders that never came, were scooped up one by one without ANY resistance. Everyone was waiting for the next election, which never came, except on the Nazis' own terms.

(Class, repeat after me: "ACORN." "Amnesty for illegals." "Moving the Census authority into the White House." I think you get the picture.)

Thus we must not wait for the mis-named "Republican" party to get its act together. It never will. If they sold us out in good times, welshing on their promises after 1994, growing the power and scope of government, not only refusing to reign in the ATF and the FBI BUT GROWING THEIR POWER AND LENGTHENING THEIR LEASHES, what may we expect for them in bad times but ineffectual excuses?

The Tea Parties did not come from the GOP, as much as the Dems might wish to imagine it. People are flooding into the streets and the public meetings precisely because they have concluded that the "system," as they have understood it, no longer protects them. Thus, they will make their own arrangements.

Yet the other side cannot see beyond their own world view and assumes that everything is as before and thus, they can order us about and make it stick. This is because they believe in democracy (majority rule, which is three wolves and a sheep sitting down to vote on what to have for dinner) and not the ordered liberty of the Founders' Republic.

The health care debate, then, is like every other debate we have with them. It is not about access to health care, but about government control. But they think now, because of the election, they have the right to abrogate the Constitution (which is not even a concern for them, because as Amish Tom points out above, the only thing they respect is force) and tell the rest of us what to do.

In this situation, there is only one thing to do, one message to get across to the other side. It is not polite. It does not rest upon "legality." It is this, and we must tell this to our opponents as often and as loudly as we can:

"If you try to take our firearms we will kill you."

That IS what we are talking about, isn't it? That is certainly what the Founders said at Lexington and Concord, and later, with the Second Amendment.

We Three Percenters have tried to make that point, but not quite so brutally, with the Doctrine of the Three Percent:

"We will not disarm.

You cannot convince us.

You cannot intimidate us.

You can try to kill us, if you think you can.

But remember, we'll shoot back.

And we are not going away.

Your move."

We must get across to them that ONE TINY BIT MORE OF INFRINGEMENT, and we will NOT obey, hence, when they seek to enforce it and attack those of us who refuse, the bullets begin to fly.

If we can get them to understand that civil war is possible, that their own miserable hides are on the line if they start it, then perhaps they will back off. It is our only hope, the rule of law being knocked flat by travesties such as the Olofson case.

The Second Amendment, in and of itself, is no longer credible as a deterrent because we have not insisted upon its enforcement. The failure has been ours, not the Founders. Not even really the other side's, for the Founders foresaw their arrival as inevitable. They counted on us, the armed citizenry, and we have heretofore let them down. We allowed ourselves to be shoved back, grumbling, EVEN AS WE HELD THE INSTRUMENTS OF OUR LIBERTY IN OUR OWN HANDS. But, as our enemies understood, they meant nothing without the will to use them.

The time has come, my fellow armed citizens, to "stick our guns in the tyrant's face" and back him off a step or three. Nothing less will save us, or our children's and grandchildren's liberty, from the tyrant's boot and the long dark night of collectivism.

We MUST do this.

Here.

Now.

Join us.

Mike Vanderboegh
The alleged leader of a merry band of Three Percenters
sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com

Friday, September 4, 2009

Cleaning up the ATF's Augean stables?



In Greek mythology, Augeas was the King of Elis and was best known for his stables, which housed the single greatest number of cattle in the country and had never been cleaned -- at least until the time of the great hero Heracles. (Also known as Hercules.) In the Fifth of the Twelve Labors of Heracles, the Greek hero was given the task of cleaning out these Augean stables in a single day. Unlike Heracles' previous tasks, this was intended to be both humiliating and impossible, since the livestock were immortal and divinely healthy, thus producing an enormous quantity of cow pies.

In the tale, however, Heracles succeeds in cleaning the stables by rerouting the rivers Alpheus and Peneus to wash out the excrement. This made Augeas furious because he had promised Heracles one-tenth of his cattle if the job was finished in one day. Angry beyond reason, he refused to honor the agreement, and Heracles killed him after completing the tasks and gave his kingdom to Augeas' son, Phyleus, who had been exiled for supporting Heracles against his father. However, the success of his labor was ultimately discounted because the rushing waters had done the work of cleaning the stables, not Heracles, and because the hero was paid. In any case, the cows kept dumping.

I thought about old Heracles, when a good friend sent me a link to this.



From the website:

Managers, Counsel, Internal Affairs and staff of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (BATFE or "ATF") have repeatedly given false testimony, concealed substantial waste, fraud and abuse, abused their lawful authority, and waged systematic campaigns of reprisal against their own employees that dare to speak out. This website is intended by members of the ATF community to promote restoration of integrity, accountability and responsibility to ATF's leadership, and regain the trust of the American taxpayer.

www.CleanUpATF.org is a non-profit organization dedicated to returning integrity, accountability and decency to the management of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE or "ATF").

In recent years, ATF management has become widely and officially known for corruption, self-service, and at times, overt incompetence. Moreover, ATF managers at all levels routinely retaliate or discriminate against employees who make good faith attempts to address significant cases of flagrant abuse, unlawful acts, waste of taxpayer resources, etc. Managers often use the threat or actual imposition of unfounded disciplinary actions, Internal Affairs “investigations”, punitive transfers, and other flagrantly unethical measures to suppress dissension and subvert legitimate complaints about serious abuses.

In the last two years alone, there have been nearly 400 employee complaints. In an organization with only about 5,000 employees, that is a huge drain on resources and adversely impacts the agency's ability to pursue its purported mission of locking up bad guys. Many experienced and skilled field agents spend so much time just trying to cover their rear ends against trivial, bureaucratic internal policies and arbitrary management actions, that they have little time to actually enforce the nation's firearms and other laws.

Recently publicized cases have involved malicious and carefully orchestrated management campaigns to smear, discredit, and professionally destroy agents who have repeatedly risked their lives for ATF and the public, solely in reprisal for the filing of legitimate complaints. In some instances, management has gone so far as to implicitly accuse agents of firebombing their own homes, without the slightest shred of evidence, while refusing to adequately investigate the actual criminal suspects, all for the sole purpose of harassing and cowing ATF’s own people into quiet submission.

The Bureau's leadership has also miserably failed or even deliberately refused to meet its responsibility to protect highly decorated undercover agents from documented threats of murder, rape or other acts of reprisal against themselves and their families by some of the most vicious criminals on the planet.

All of these factors substantially degrade BATFE's ability to accomplish its authorized missions, and constitute an inexcusable misuse of taxpayer resources.


Now, this may strike many of my readers as ridiculous. One called it, "Just like being a shop steward representing concentration camp guards -- he's still a guard. Who cares if he has a bitch with the camp commandant? Why would we want to support somebody who just wants to make an unconstitutional agency more fair and efficient?"

Well, I'll tell you why. The fact of the matter is that WE, all by ourselves, are not ever going to get oversight hearings into ATF misconduct in cases like David Olofson's or Doug Friesen's. Not on our own, not by ourselves. It ain't happening.

And, I will concede that it may well be too late for any hearings to have a material effect on events. However, that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

And these guys are in a perfect spot to shine a light on the cockroaches who run ATF -- the SES, Senior Executive Service. "Waco Jim"? SES. Little Jimmy Vann (alleged named by an ATF secretary because of the size of his member) of the agency's national counsel's office? SES.

So here's what I urge you to do. If you have a congressman or congresswoman who is on any oversight committee, whether they are Republican or Democrat, forward these damning allegations by field agents against the SES crooks to the congresscritters with the demand that they look into these charges. Don't editorialize. Don't criticize the agency's mission. Keep it short and simple. You want the taxpayer's dollars protected and spent wisely. You want these agents' complaints looked into.

Take Bart Stupak, for example. That Michigan Comgressman who represents the UP and some of the "thumb," tries to stay on the NRA "A" list (and yes, I hear your groans, but what matters in this case is not his purity but his utility).

To quote from his website:

Within the Commerce Committee, Stupak serves as the Chairman of the Oversight and Investigation Subcommittee (commonly referred to as “O&I”). Throughout 2006, as the top Democrat on the Subcommittee, Stupak helped spearhead investigations into high-profile issues like online child pornography, security breaches at U.S. nuclear labs, the 2006 Hewlett-Packard pretexting scandal and the BP pipeline rupture at Prudhoe Bay. Stupak’s law enforcement background and his work as an attorney make him uniquely qualified to chair the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, a position he obtained in January of 2007.


So why can't Bart investigate the ATF? Hell, their alleged justification for all their operations is "interstate commerce," right? But don't stop with Bart. Write your congresscritter. Adopt these agent's cause, at least for one letter. For if THEY are able to get an oversight hearing, some GOPer may be able to slide in a panel on Olofson, Friesen, et al., meaning WE get an oversight hearing too.

Remember this, you ideologically-pure warriors. Your cockroach enemy hates the light, ANY light.

So shine it.

It may be that the ATF's Augean stables can never be cleaned. Probably not. That doesn't mean there aren't a few particular turds who badly need flushing in and of themselves.

Mike
III

So, let me ask you something. Do YOU think the ATF is worth 1.1 BILLION taxpayer dollars per year? They do.

Jack Booted Thug Central, or, as "Mad Bob" of the Dogtown Rangers calls it, "The Concrete Asshole of the Universe." The new ATF headquarters in DC.

A tip of the boonie hat and my thanks to BPWZ for forwarding this link to the ATF's Congressional Budget Submission for Fiscal Year 2010. Dated May 2009, it asks for a total of $1,120,772,000.00, of which $1,114,772,000.00 is "Direct Salaries and Expenses." Well paid jack-booted thugs, ain't they?

They also ask for $616,000.00 as part of Operation Gunrunner "to purchase armored vehicles and tracking devices to ensure the safety of ATF personnel."

Supposedly this is to protect their roidal asses when they cross over the border into Mexico. For the money, this is probably just for up-armored Suburbans, and hey, in a billion-plus dollar budget, what's a mere $616,000.00? Chump change. At least they don't have an Air Force of their own anymore.

Of course with ACORN going around to everybody's houses and plugging in their GPS coordinates (as happened to my mother recently in Marion, Ohio)as an alleged part of "the Census," there's no need for direct personal confrontation any more. Just program a cruise missile or Predator, right? (Pity Herod didn't have that technology at his fingertips when he decided to kill all the new-born babies in his kingdom, huh?)

Note: Be sure and get the name, the complete name, from his/her driver's license, of all ACORN volunteers before you refuse to answer their questions. That way, you have as much information on them as, or more, as they are likely to have on you.

Anyway, enjoy perusing the budget request and justifications of the National Bureau of Jack Booted Thugs. After all, it is your tax dollars at work.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Political Cannibalism -- MoveOn.Org morphing to BiteOff.Org -- Obamanoid bites off tip of counter-demonstrator's finger. "Mad Bob" sez "Pack Heat!"

MoveOn.Org Demonstration Gets Out of Hand. No, REALLY out of hand. Like missing fingers "out of hand."

A tip of the boonie hat to "Mad Bob," commander of the fabled hardcore but shadowy Alabama constitutional militia formation known as the Dogtown Rangers, who signs his emails "MOS 1372." He just drew my attention to this story out of California.

Mad Bob's comment?

"Hell, Mike, that sumbitch musta been hongry. And they wonder why our side's starting to pack heat at these turdfests?"

Indeed.

Mike
III

Finger Bitten Off During Health Protest

THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. (Sept. 3) -- One man bit off part of another man's finger when a health care reform demonstration turned violent.

William Rice said doctors did not reattach the bitten-off part of his left pinky after he got in the middle of a Southern California rally Wednesday night that he said was "very scary."

"I didn't go out to demonstrate my beliefs, I happened to be driving by and I stopped to ask people what their purpose was," Rice, 65, said in a telephone interview Thursday. "I had no signs, I was not part of the demonstration."

About 100 demonstrators in favor of health care reform had gathered on a Thousand Oaks street corner for an event organized by MoveOn.org. About 25 counterdemonstrators gathered across the street.

Rice declined to say Thursday which side of the debate he falls on.

Ventura County sheriff's spokesman Eric Buschow said a confrontation erupted after the biter crossed from the MoveOn.org side of the street to the counterprotest, where Rice was standing.

A loud scuffle ensued, punches were thrown, and the tip of Rice's finger was bitten off, Buschow said.

The biter fled before authorities arrived. He could face felony mayhem charges.

"We don't know the identity of the man who bit the finger off," Buschow said. "We want to contact him and get his side of the story."

Buschow said authorities are piecing together the events from witness interviews.

There are conflicting accounts of who started the fight, Buschow said. "There's a question about blurring the line between self-defense and who the primary aggressor was," he said.

Rice was treated at Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center. The top joint of his pinky, including his whole fingernail, was severed, hospital spokeswoman Kris Carraway-Bowman said.

She said his treatment was covered by Medicare.

Rice said he and his attacker did not have a conversation about health care unless "you want to call him screaming in my face that I'm an idiot a conversation."

MoveOn.org spokeswoman Ilyse Hogue said in a written statement that the incident is a "regrettable act of violence" but the group had few facts about the situation.

The group is in favor of health care reform that includes a "public option" providing government-sponsored insurance.

Scuffles and noisy protests over the proposed health care overhaul have broken out at recent town hall meetings hosted by members of Congress across the country.

"Mayors Against Illegal Guns"? How about "Citizens Against Illegal Mayors"?

Dave Workman asks here, "What is an 'Illegal Gun'?"

His point is well taken, but I have a better idea. Why, instead of "Mayors Against Illegal Guns" don't we have "Citizens Against Illegal Mayors"? I mean, Birmingham has an illegal mayor. His name is Larry Langford. This is him here:

He took bribes, say the Feds, in return for steering bond issues.

Oh, Yeah, and this is his confessed bagman, Al LaPierre, former head of the Alabama Democrat Party and Al's lawyer.

This is Bill Blount, the confessed "bond daddy" who bribed Larry using Al, and his lawyer.

Both have rolled on Larry. They are going to testify against Larry. Is Larry shamed? Is Larry going to resign as Mayor? Heaven forfend! He's going to play it all the way out to the bitter end.

Oh, did I mention that Larry is a member of "Mayors Against Illegal Guns"?

Yup. Shore is.

Figures, don't it?

Mike
III

"Operation New Media": Obama's High Tech Enemies List

In the old days, your friendly neighborhood Gestapoman had to work hard to identify enemies of the state.

Then, with the advent of computers and email, government computers could be set to watch for specifically identified "thought criminals," or search email "cc" lists for more potential suspects, or even watch for "key words."

Of course, it used to be that such eavesdropping had to be handled out of politically tricky organizations like the FBI or the NSA. Not anymore. Obama is doing for electronic enemies lists what Richard Nixon did for burglary. He's taking it off the streets and putting it in the White House where it belongs.

Here's the latest from the National Law and Policy Center.

Mike
III

Obama White House Has Secret Plan To Harvest Personal Data From Social Networking Websites

Submitted by Ken Boehm on Mon, 08/31/2009 - 19:07

NLPC has uncovered a plan by the White House New Media operation to hire a technology vendor to conduct a massive, secret effort to harvest personal information on millions of Americans from social networking websites.

The information to be captured includes comments, tag lines, emails, audio, and video. The targeted sites include Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr and others – any space where the White House “maintains a presence.”

In the course of investigating procurement by the White House New Media office, NLPC discovered a 51-page solicitation of bids that was filed on Friday, August 21, 2009.

Filed as Solicitation # WHO-S-09-0003, it is posted at FedBizzOps.com.

Click here to download a 51-page pdf of the solicitation.

While the solicitation specifies a 12-month contract, it allows for seven one-year extensions. It specifies no dollar cap. Other troubling issues include:

extremely broad secrecy terms preventing the vendor from disclosing to the public or the media what information is being captured and archived (page 7, “Restriction Against Disclosure”)

wholesale capturing of comments by non-White House staff on publicly accessible sites
capturing of content of any type (text, graphics, audio, or video)

capturing of comments by both Obama critics and supporters, with no restriction as to how the White House would use the information.


This is the third controversy involving the White House internet operations in less than a month. First, Obama’s New Media operation asked supporters to send information about critics of the White House health care effort to a White House email. This provoked a storm of criticism and the White House retreated. Then large number of people complained of getting email spam from the White House supporting the President’s health care position. Again the White House was forced to back down.

Now the same people at the White House are at it again with an ambitious plan to harvest huge amounts of information from the web and specifically social networking sites.

Given the White House’s recent abuse of its New Media operations, this huge, new secretive program is yet another sign that this Administration is at best indifferent to privacy rights and at worst prepared to violate civil liberties for political purposes.

Perhaps anticipating negative reaction to the invasiveness of the plan, a justification is provided in a Q&A. section of the solicitation. Question #9 reads:

The Presidential Records Act does not require the storage or archiving of non-EOP content, as such is there a specific reason as to why the content provided on EOP related websites in the form of comments is included in these archiving procedures?

Answer: The PRA includes in its definition of presidential records content ―received by PRA components and personnel. Out of an abundance of caution, we are treating comments made by non-PRA personnel on sites on which a PRA component has a presence as presidential records, requiring them to be captured or sampled.

Of course, this interpretation of the Presidential Records Act is so expansive that virtually any communication mentioning the president or the Administration could become subject to collection and archiving under the Act. This is not out of an “abundance of caution,” but out of an over-abundance of power. President Obama should make sure that this plan goes no further.

See also CNN 'Expert' Lamely Claims to 'Debunk' NLPC on White House Data Harvesting From Social Networks.

A "Reasonable Mind" whistling past Bloody Hill & the graveyard of history.

Just a peaceful piece of southwest Missouri prairie today.

Folks, as I couldn't find Lyndon's e-mail address, this snail mail sits in the out box for the postal turtle this morning.

Mike
III

Lyndon K. Pitcock
11618 N. Farm Rd. 231,
Fair Grove, MO 65648

Dear Lyndon,

A link to your letter to the Springfield News Leader was posted on the Keep and Bear Arms web site, and in reading it, I could only shake my head at someone so much a prisoner of his own world view that he does not understand that the ground upon which he believes he firmly stands, and indeed has always stood, is actually the crumbling lip of a precipice.

This is your letter as printed, below. Kindly correct me if this is not what you said.

Reasonable minds will eventually prevail

September 2, 2009

I want to commend Len Eagleburger and Dr. Roger Ray for their letter and "From the Left" article on Aug. 19 . The content of both of their issues can be combined into one. Yes, the Republicans are committing credibility suicide with their bald-faced lies on every front. Especially the health care issue. With Rush Limbaugh constantly comparing the Obama administration to the Nazi culture, and Sarah Palin's fictitious "death panels," the Republicans take it and run with it. Very few of them have not condoned this nonsense with their silence.

The town hall fiascos Len speaks of not only have been proven to be pushed by the insurance lobby, but show the true colors of Republicans such as Sen. Grassley.

The people of the town hall meetings who wish not to have civil debate do not realize that their depredation of our First Amendment rights only erode that right further. The clowns showing up at these town hall meetings sporting loaded weapons are only eroding our Second Amendment rights with their blatant abuse of that right. Reasonable minds will prevail. We will have affordable health care in this country. To not pursue this endeavor is shameful, and at the least, irresponsible.

Lyndon Pitcock Fair Grove


The same piece of real estate, 10 August 1861.

Lyndon, I'm not going to try to argue any of the points above. You presume to have the authority to dictate to the rest of us how we shall act, where we shall go, what we shall do when we get there, how much of our own money we get to keep and how much your side will seize for your "reasonable" and high-minded purposes. I get that. It is only an extension, merely, of what your side in this fundamental political debate over the size and scope of the power of the Federal leviathan has been saying and doing to the rest of us over the past 75 years now.

It is indeed nothing new. But here is what is new.

We refuse to be shoved back any further from the free exercise of our liberty, our right to property and the protections of the rule of law.

Not. One. More. Inch.

This, I know, is beyond your ability to comprehend.

You believe that "reasonable minds will prevail" and your side will succeed once more in shoving another circumscription of our liberty and and an additional theft of our property down our throats. You think because your side won a national election that you get to tell us what to do, regardless of the Constitution and the rule of law as hitherto understood.

Lyndon, I want you to do me, and yourself, a favor.

You are lucky to have, quite close by, the Wilson's Creek National Battlefield Park where a small but ghastly meat-grinder of a battle was fought in the opening days of the last civil war, on 10 August 1861.

I want you to drive there, see the displays in the museum, and then I want you to climb up the aptly named "Bloody Hill." Sit there, please, in the heat of the afternoon, and listen.

If you listen very, very carefully, you can hear the faint echoes of the shots, the screams, the prayers -- the sounds of many men dying -- borne upon the wind as it ruffles the prairie grass.

You may, if you wish, try to drown out those whispers of dead men by chanting "reasonable minds will prevail" over and over again.

But know this. Those men thought so too, right up to the moment they became convinced otherwise by Minie balls and bayonets that "reasonable minds" wouldn't prevail, not until one side or the other killed as many of the other side as it took to win the argument.

Silly, silly man. You think this is about politics as usual. You think, because you completely fail to understand our world view, that this is about an argument of "health care policy."

It is not.

This is about the last of what some other men once called "a long train of abuses and usurpations." This is about us being done with your side pushing us back from our God-given, inalienable rights to life, liberty and property. We understand, if you do not, the existential threat to free men and women that your "reasonable" policies pose.

So, please, do us both a favor and sit on top of Bloody Hill and listen, really listen. You may then become a little less certain about "reasonable minds" and a little more understanding of the unintended consequences of shoving other people around to suit your own perceived "noble" goals. You should listen too to the voices and the anger of the town halls and the Tea Parties rather than denigrate them as a contrived manifestation of the sad-sack GOP, the radio talk-show circuit and the insurance companies.

Nothing could be further from the truth. We are so far past that.

It is precisely the failures of traditional means to protect our liberties through the corrupt and corroded tool that is the ill-named "Republican" Party that people are exercising their own voices and seeing to their own means of self-defense, political and otherwise. But still you cling to the notion because it comforts you in your arrogance and your ignorance. It is when people stop talking, even stop shouting, and start acting, that you have to worry about. Should you silence them by stifling the debate and forcing the issue to your liking over their objections, then -- trust me on this Lyndon -- THEN you will wish you hadn't.

And if you think that civil war cannot once again come to this country, you are whistling past the graveyard of history.

Put simply: Quit shoving, Lyndon, and we won't shove you back. Hard.

Listen, rather, to the ghostly voices in the wind on Bloody Hill.

Sometimes, Lyndon, "reasonable minds" DON'T prevail.

Remember that.

Mike Vanderboegh
PO Box 926
Pinson, AL 35126
sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Tom Coburn praises GOA & disses NRA.

Just received this video link, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hc7d78ixrE from a GOA supporter with this comment:

Coburn laid bare the NRA efforts to derail his parks amendment. That part starts around 7:00 minutes in. Please feel free to post and to distribute.

The Dreaded AR-47.

A tip of the boonie hat to typeay for forwarding me this delicious piece of public ignorance from the Associated Press.



His comment:

I respectfully submit that if you can't tell an AK from an AR, you have no business being either a Police detective, OR an Associated Press news editor.


Indeed.

Mike
III

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes and Marine Veteran David Hedrick Will Be at the 9-12 March on Washington. Join Us There!

Just received this in from Oath Keepers. . .



Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes and Marine Veteran David Hedrick Will Be at the 9-12 March on Washington. Join Us There!

A few days ago a supporter of Oath Keepers donated an airline ticket for Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes to attend the upcoming 9-12 March on Washington DC.

Today, that same supporter also donated a ticket to DC for Oath Keeper Marine veteran David Hedrick, the veteran who took Congressman Baird to task at a town hall meeting. Go here to watch that video.

As a result, Stewart Rhodes has invited David Hedrick to come to the 9-12 DC march as part of the Oath Keepers contingent, and to be a speaker at our dinner that same night, and David has accepted the invitation. We consider David’s action in calling out Congressman Baird on the violation of his oath to be an example of what needs to be done. Oaths should mean something, and when a public servant has violated his oath of office, he should be called on it. And who better to chastise an oath breaker, than an Oath Keeper?

Why You Should Join Us in DC on September 12

FROM STEWART: This march on Washington DC, on September 12, 2009, is shaping up to be an historic event. This march is not just about taxes, socialized medicine, bankster bailouts, or proposed infringement of our right to bear arms. This is a march about liberty, and about our growing resistance to the Leviathan on the Potomac that has grown far beyond the limits of the Constitution, thanks to sell-out oath breaking politicians of both major parties. More Americans than ever before are waking up to this great danger to our Bill of Rights and to the very survival of our Constitutional Republic, and we have seen that awareness manifested in Tea Parties across the nation.

Oath Keepers has been part of that Tea Party movement from the start, beginning with my speech to the Knoxville Tea Party on April 15, 2009, where 4,000 Americans – including current serving military, police, veterans, and patriotic citizens – stood together as one, raised their right hands, and swore an oath to defend the Constitution. It was a powerful experience.

Then, at the invitation of Committees of Safety, we conducted an oath ceremony on Lexington Green, on April 19, 2009, at our first official Oath Keepers gathering. That was a truly stirring experience, with active duty military, police, and veterans standing together on that sacred ground, on that sacred day, to renew our oaths.

Then, on July 4, 2009, Oath Keepers’ representatives spoke at over 30 Tea Party rallies across the nation, each reading aloud our declaration of orders we will not obey and conducting an oath ceremony where active duty and veterans could renew their oaths, and where citizens who had never sworn the oath could do so for the first time.

Well, now the Tea Party movement is marching on Washington DC in grand style and we Oath Keepers feel compelled to join them on September 12, to exercise our right to free speech, assembly, and association to put the oath breaking politicians on DC on notice that we are awake and vigilant, and this Republic will not go quietly into the night.

We have contacted the organizers of the march and rally to offer our services in conducting an oath ceremony and we are waiting to hear back from them. But regardless of whether we conduct such a ceremony as part of the official march and rally, we will certainly conduct an oath ceremony at our dinner later that night.

I urge you to join us there on the Mall in DC if it is at all possible for you to go. I know it is short notice, but now is the time to stand, and this march is the place to do it. We will have a sizeable Oath Keepers contingent there for the entire day, including several state directors and part of our national board of directors.

Unlike the June Gathering of Eagles rally which was unfortunately canceled, this one is a for sure go, and we will be there. David Hedrick and I already have our tickets, as do many other Oath Keepers. Get yours today and join us there!
Oath Keepers Dinner after the Rally on Saturday, September 12

After the rally we will be hosting an Oath Keepers dinner. Guest speakers will be Marine veteran David Hedrick, and current serving LCDR David R. Gillie, USN. We will likely also have several other exciting guest speakers at the dinner, so stay tuned for updates. The time and location of the dinner is still in the works, but you can count on an eventful evening of fellowship with fellow Oath Keepers and other like minded Americans after the rally.

I invite you to join us on September 12, 2009, on the Mall in DC.

Guardians of the Republic, honor your oaths!

Join us!

Stand.

For the Republic,

Stewart Rhodes
Founder of Oath Keepers

Home Schooling Gets a BIG Boost: Obama Plays to Tyrannical Collectivist Stereotype

A cult of personality arises when a country's leader uses mass media to create an idealized and heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships and Stalinist governments. A cult of personality is similar to general hero worship, except that it is created specifically for political leaders. -- Wikipedia.



In 1930's Germany, the new socialist government of Adolf Hitler (NAZI National Socialist Workers' Party) began indoctrinating children in the quasi-military organization, the Hitler Youth, to inform on their parents should they overhear discussions subversive to the policies of the Leader. -- Bart Willruth, "Citizen Informants," at American Thinker, 5 August 2009.


These people have absolutely no concept of what it is about themselves that scares the crap out of traditional Americans. Absolutely none. Either that, or in their arrogance they don't care, or are too stupid to see the unintended consequences.

All of the above?

How else to explain this?

Obama is going to speak to our children who are enrolled in government-run schools, directly and over our heads on 8 September. The link above is the "PreK-6 Menu of Classroom activities" of "President Obama's Address to Students Across America." No president has ever been so full of himself, or so dismissive of parental authority, to try something like this.

None.

Never.

"Every girl belongs to us" -- League of German Maidens poster

A snippet:

As the President speaks, teachers can ask students to write down key ideas or phrases that are important or personally meaningful. Students could use a note-taking graphic organizer such as a Cluster Web, or students could record their thoughts on sticky notes. Younger children can draw pictures and write as appropriate. As students listen to the speech, they could think about the following:

What is the President trying to tell me?

What is the President asking me to do?

What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?




Oh, yeah. Home schooling ought to get a BIG boost out of this.

Folks are already concerned about the unadulterated collectivist propaganda crap that passes for education which is poured into our kids ears every day at these indoctrination centers. Now Obama wants to reinforce that with what can only be perceived as an attempt to create a cult of personality in little kids' heads?

"They're coming for our children and will turn them against us like the Hitler Youth," used to be considered paranoia unsupported by facts.

Good job, Obamanoids. Great plan: Further scare the crap out of people who are already pissed off and uneasy.

Of course if you want to come to DC the following Saturday on 12 September, and join us in telling Obama what he can do with his cult of personality, you'll have plenty of company.

See you there.

Mike
III

If you get an e-mail saying "Your friend raped me" . . .

. . . it is a virus and a nasty one too. It can even appear to come from your own e-mail address -- mine did. Delete it immediately. I sent this warning out to my own list and I might as well post it here too.

These people are despicable.

Mike
III

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Anniversary: When the Einsatzgruppen began to march.

Der einsatz polizei SS.

SEPTEMBER 1, 1939
by W.H. Auden

I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odour of death
Offends the September night.

Accurate scholarship can
Unearth the whole offence
From Luther until now
That has driven a culture mad,
Find what occurred at Linz,
What huge imago made
A psychopathic god:
I and the public know
What all schoolchildren learn,
Those to whom evil is done
Do evil in return.

Exiled Thucydides knew
All that a speech can say
About Democracy,
And what dictators do,
The elderly rubbish they talk
To an apathetic grave;
Analysed all in his book,
The enlightenment driven away,
The habit-forming pain,
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again.

Into this neutral air
Where blind skyscrapers use
Their full height to proclaim
The strength of Collective Man,
Each language pours its vain
Competitive excuse:
But who can live for long
In an euphoric dream;
Out of the mirror they stare,
Imperialism's face
And the international wrong.

Der einsatz polizei SS: A member of Einsatzgruppe D prepares to shoot a Jewish man in Vinnitsa, Ukrainian SSR, Soviet Union, in 1942. The photograph was inscribed: "The last Jew in Vinnitsa."

Faces along the bar
Cling to their average day:
The lights must never go out,
The music must always play,
All the conventions conspire
To make this fort assume
The furniture of home;
Lest we should see where we are,
Lost in a haunted wood,
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been happy or good.

The windiest militant trash
Important Persons shout
Is not so crude as our wish:
What mad Nijinsky wrote
About Diaghilev
Is true of the normal heart;
For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have,
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.

From the conservative dark
Into the ethical life
The dense commuters come,
Repeating their morning vow;
'I will be true to the wife,
I'll concentrate more on my work,'
And helpless governors wake
To resume their compulsory game:
Who can release them now,
Who can reach the dead,
Who can speak for the dumb?

All I have is a voice
To undo the folded lie,
The romantic lie in the brain
Of the sensual man-in-the-street
And the lie of Authority
Whose buildings grope the sky:
There is no such thing as the State
And no one exists alone;
Hunger allows no choice
To the citizen or the police;
We must love one another or die.

Der einsatz polizei SS: An execution of Poles by an Einsatzgruppe in Leszno, October 1939

Defenseless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.

I present Auden's poem here ironically. Auden wrote this poem from the safety of the United States, having left his native Britain when he saw war was coming. This caused him later to be condemned as a coward by his fellow countrymen. He stayed in the United States the entire war.

It is ironic, too, because I want to get across the point that "einsatz polizei" ("special police") who travel around at government orders in "Einsatzgruppen" ("special groups") are not stopped by ineffectual, effete poets, but by determined men with firearms and the guts to use them, who show their "affirming flames" in muzzle flashes.

Einsatz polizei are not just a faded memory from a forgotten war, however. When American administrations try hard enough, they can achieve einsatzgruppen actions too. And no one has yet held them to account. Here's an American government einsatzgruppe at work.

Der einsatz polizei FBI, 19 April 1993.

And the people who did this and who covered it up are now back in power -- at the highest levels.

Two questions.

Do you think they've learned their lesson when they didn't pay a price the first time?

Do you get the point?

Mike
III