Forgive me, Sir, if we collectively tell you to go pound sand. Or not forgive. Eat excrement and expire, anyway.
General Peter Chiarelli Invites Veterans To Violate Their Oath
Chiarelli is now part of the cool kids gang along with all of the other statists. I’m glad to have him as an enemy. But if he rationalizes his own adultery towards his oath to the constitution right after reminding us that he did in fact take such an oath, he makes matters worse by telling us that he has no respect whatsoever for those who served and suffered. He invites veterans to break their oath as well.
My suspicion is that the ranks of veterans isn’t fertile ground for Chiarelli and his gang of cool kids. But it should be enough that he thinks no more of you [veterans] than to surmise that you might be an oath-breaker just like him, and he would sooner see you sent to hell than lose his political fight to control other people and take their liberties.
What contemptible trash. How sad that men such as him were in charge of any campaign at all. They are all as bad as the corrupt politicians they serve, and dear veteran, if you side with them, you’re no better than they are.
12 comments:
Note that past a certain point, they are PROMOTED based upon blackmailability and how closely they hew to being annelids in the spinal dept. They are the latter day Janissaries who have long ago handed their balls to the Pagan Gods of Mordor on the Potomac.
There are a few who I worked for, directly & indirectly that I'd go to Hell with. The rest can just go to Hell.
Not really any different than guys like Luttrell from the SpecOps community that don't believe civilians should own "assault rifles"....as they quickly state that they "support the 2nd Amendment though".
This enrages me. I can never find out how to contact these Bastards, let alone better yet, to actually and proximaly spot one or all of them in person, but it never happens statistical chance being what it is. And these and their like ilk don't travel in my circles. If one of you know how to contact them in a text format such as e-mail please SPEAK UP.
Chiarellis career is at best .... average. But, he's identified himself, so good.
Anon 11:24...we don't own "assault rifles"...we own "Armalite Rifles."
What about my "Assault Baseball Bat"? Because that's exactly the tool I'd like to wrap around his epaulet adorned neck.. Traitors like him are a dime a dozen. Their philosophy: "Secure a pension for me, and to hell with thee". NYPD is chock full of these guys. What they turn a blind eye to though is this - should gov't go full blown annihilation on it's people, Quislings like him are in the second tier to be disposed of; because dictators cannot trust anyone who would turn on his own people. Just ask the SA..
Chiarelli's just one more piece of evidence that Obama and his butt-kissers in the Pentagon are creating an armed force that serves government, not the Constitution. The high command is now composed of social justice warriors, or affirmative action babies -- here's another example.
http://usdefensewatch.com/2016/08/ray-mabus-social-experiment-navy-is-steaming-ahead-to-disaster/
Generals who are leaders no longer exist in the military. 90% are politicians, 9 percent are managers. 1 percent were leaders, but those have been or are being forced out / retired. 26 years military, glad to be out, don't recommend it to anyone.
and Obamy's social justice sisters want to provoke a fight with the Russians! Hilarity too.
There may be a WW before the CW, and there will be starving people everywhere. Beans and bullets now when they're available, because it's all going to be scarce soon enough.
The USSA military might just get another Bull Run.
Well, much as I agree with the assessment that his willingness to discard his oath to defend the Constitution is contemptible, I would like to point out that he has no right to call himself a general. If an enemy is using asymmetric tactics to attack soft targets, further degrading the capacity of those committed to actually defending those targets doesn't make any sense at all.
From a military perspective, the only possible reason to reduce the ability of the general population to resist terrorist attacks (whether motivated by Islam or more idiosyncratic delusions) is because you want such attacks to be more successful, do more damage, and happen more often. Generally governments do this to ensure that they increase their own ability to carry out such attacks at a sustainable cost to themselves.
Or it might be, shocker of shockers, that this traitorous worm understands the military principles in effect perfectly and is simply on the other side....
If he were a real soldier not a desk driver, he would know that "Your mind is your primary weapon." Humans are dangerous predators, not inanimate objects.
War crimes trials are going to be very entertaining I suspect.
Post a Comment