Sipsey Street Irregulars: Supreme Court Won’t Block Ban On High Capacity Magazines

Friday, March 14, 2014

Supreme Court Won’t Block Ban On High Capacity Magazines

A federal appeals court refused to intervene, and on Wednesday, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who handles emergency appeals from California and eight other Western states, denied a stay without comment.

So why do I have a right to own guns, or high capacity magazines? Because God says so. That settles it for me, whether the constitution recognizes it or not, whether a judge certifies it or not. You may not have my world view, and I’m okay with that. But every man must come to his own conclusions and ascertain the ultimate foundation for what he does and what he believes.

You live on the Serengeti desert in a Machiavellian world of eat or be eaten, with no concept of right and wrong, or you know whereof you act, and you know why what you do and what you believe is morally righteous. And If you were relying on a federal judge to warranty your rights, you’ve been disavowed of that mistaken belief as we speak. Is that clear enough?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...: No matter. F' em.; March 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM
Paul X said...: Again, the drawbacks of a belief in the government religion, are revealed. Time to stop paying attention to tyrants...; March 14, 2014 at 10:57 AM
Unknown said...: Dutchman your so right..
I've decided long ago Im not listening to these phools when it comes to bans...

They are all idiots and dangerous to us all.

Im still waiting for our three percent to reset this country and validate our constitution..

Oh did i mention Im willing and able; March 14, 2014 at 11:02 AM
Anonymous said...: SCOTUS is not our friend. This is demonstrated by the Heller - McDonald conflicts in an attempt to admit rights exist but retain government control over their exercise.

We must stop BEGGING our government like it is the arbiter of permissions and return to instructing it as it's master the way the founders intended.

The choice is simple.
Either we are ruled over by nine robed kings,unelected and unaccountable, or we are Freemen who's liberties overrule the attempts of evil men to usurp them.

Me? I'm a Freeman.... and a III percenter at that.

Mike
III; March 14, 2014 at 3:12 PM
Neil E. Wright said...: A little revolution is in the air: 88% tired of big government’s restrictions
Read more at http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/libertarian/a-little-revolution-is-in-the-air-12151/#WQL28YiY5uL2C8Bd.99; March 14, 2014 at 8:15 PM
Anonymous said...: First off, they are not who they say they are. They are not a legitimate Article III Court since they outlawed federal common law. Bork warned us of them in his book the Temptation of America. They are unelected and unaccountable to boot. They also do not represent the Republic since it has been overthrown by Locke's Doctrine of Dissolution. They are imposters and operating under the color of law. The whole thing is a scam designed to fool the sheep into thinking they are legitimate. They do not have the authority to rule on anything. The Constitution was written in plain English so a 18 year old farm boy could understand it. We do not need anyone to "interpret" it and tell us what it means. Who the hell do they think they are? Drive on the the OBJ.; March 14, 2014 at 8:35 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Friday, March 14, 2014

Supreme Court Won’t Block Ban On High Capacity Magazines

6 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers