Monday, March 10, 2014

"No militia means more intrusive law enforcement,"

If a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, then where is ours? Because if a well-regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, it follows that a state lacking such a militia is either insecure, or unfree, or possibly both.

2 comments:

AJ said...

Excellent article. Kind of a surprise to see it in USA Today.

Anonymous said...

It is indeed surprising to see such a well-researched, pro-2A article in USA Today - and I thank and congratulate the editors for publishing it! Kudos to them!

I was also encouraged by the fact that the majority of commenters were also educated on the subject and its history. Kudos to them as well!