Sipsey Street Irregulars: 'Gun loving liberals' are welcome to the debate, but who can they vote for?

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

'Gun loving liberals' are welcome to the debate, but who can they vote for?

Any ally in the fight against the forcible citizen disarmament jihad is welcome, but before the Liberal Gun Club can contribute much to that fight, they're going to have to cultivate a brand of politician nearly unheard of these days: the truly "pro-gun progressive" politician. That's a tall order.

4 comments:

Sean said...: It would be like adopting a werewolf into your family, and leaving it to look after your infant, while you shop for groceries. These so called Liberal Gun Owners are false flag, full of shit,Trojan Horses. In the news right now, it shows the govt. is sending these idiots onto the web to disturb and muddy the waters. Duh. Serve two masters?; March 4, 2014 at 8:56 AM
Anonymous said...: Conservatives have the same problem, just to a lesser extent.

100% of Democrats can't be trusted (as even those few with the personal inclination can be coerced by the party platform), and 80% of Republicans (who may give lip service but fail or compromise under the slightest pressure). There are incredibly few absolute constitutionalists for anyone to vote for.

Replace them. Help find and support worthy candidates and vote for them. Where there are no worthy candidates vote anti incumbent and let them know why and what it will take to gain your support.; March 4, 2014 at 9:34 AM
Anonymous said...: Put "Gun Loving Liberal" in the oxymoron bucket along with Tactical Nuclear Weapon and (one of my personal favorites) Cherry Tart.; March 4, 2014 at 12:13 PM
Anonymous said...: Why not start a Coalition of Liberty and just for for "none of the above traitors"

Yank lll; March 4, 2014 at 7:31 PM

"Progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress."

I believe that liberty is the only genuinely valuable thing that men have invented, at least in the field of government, in a thousand years. I believe that it is better to be free than to be not free, even when the former is dangerous and the latter safe. I believe that the finest qualities of man can flourish only in free air – that progress made under the shadow of the policeman's club is false progress, and of no permanent value. I believe that any man who takes the liberty of another into his keeping is bound to become a tyrant, and that any man who yields up his liberty, in however slight the measure, is bound to become a slave. -- H.L. Mencken

"The Fate of Unborn Millions. . ."

"The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army-Our cruel and unrelenting Enemy leaves us no choice but a brave resistance, or the most abject submission; that is all we can expect-We have therefore to resolve to conquer or die." -- George Washington to his troops before the Battle of Long Island.

"We will not go gently . . ."

This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can't be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won't be done. The Founders' Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.

But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.

And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.

-- Mike Vanderboegh, The Lessons of Mumbai:Death Cults, the "Socialism of Imbeciles" and Refusing to Submit, 1 December 2008

"A common language of resistance . . ."

"Colonial rebellions throughout the modern world have been acts of shared political imagination. Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people, protest remains a local affair easily silenced by traditional authority. Usually, however, a moment arrives when large numbers of men and women realize for the first time that they enjoy the support of strangers, ordinary people much like themselves who happen to live in distant places and whom under normal circumstances they would never meet. It is an intoxicating discovery. A common language of resistance suddenly opens to those who are most vulnerable to painful retribution the possibility of creating a new community. As the conviction of solidarity grows, parochial issues and aspirations merge imperceptibly with a compelling national agenda which only a short time before may have been the dream of only a few. For many Americans colonists this moment occurred late in the spring of 1774." -- T.H. Breen, The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence, Oxford University Press, 2004, p.1.

Sipsey Street Irregulars

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

'Gun loving liberals' are welcome to the debate, but who can they vote for?

4 comments:

Blog Archive

Followers