Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The half-life of predictions.

As you know, I'm using my insomniac hours and cleaning up the library/office and donating some of my papers to the Birmingham Public Library Archives Division. I found a copy of the 15 January 1910 issue of The Literary Digest among my father's stuff that I got after he died. In an article, "Doubts About the Practicality of the Aeroplane":
"Our skepticism is only as to the utilitarian value of any present or possible achievement of the aeroplane. We do not believe it will ever be a commercial vehicle at all. We do not believe it will find any very large place in the world of sport. We do not believe its military importance is as great as is commonly supposed, or will extend (except accidentally) beyond the range of scouting and courier service."

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

That was a reasonable observation for the day, given the level of technology they had. Heck, back in the 1950's, the CEO of IBM said that in the future, the world would only need 4 or 5 computers.

Anonymous said...

Apparently about a year...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_in_World_War_I

In 1911, Captain Bertram Dickson predicted the military use of (fixed-wing) aircraft and the ensuing development and escalation of aerial combat

:-)

RSR

Anonymous said...

Some people see the future better than others.....

Merle

Anonymous said...

“It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.” ― Yogi Berra

Ed said...

Predictions on any topic could be spot on, completely off, or anywhere between the two extremes. The hindsight enjoyed by historical perspective deludes us into thinking that the sources of these predictions are somehow "smarter" for generating the more correct predictions, which may not be true. There is a proverb that "generals always prepare for the last war", as what has worked in the past is what they can study and know best. The proverb acknowledges that we have little ability to accurately predict the future, yet we insist on somehow being prepared for it. We should instead acknowledge that we cannot accurately predict the future and concentrate on developing the ability to quickly adapt to a rapidly changing situation. 0leo

Roger J said...

When I was growing up, we had a copy of a 1960 Kiplinger's that confidently predicted that, by 1980, the average American would commute by personal chopper, making traffic jams a thing of the past but not, presumably, mid-air collisions. The writer utterly failed to predict the personal computer, but so did most of us. The future is never what we think it will be.