Along the lines of David's point, I submit that incidents like this demonstrate the facade that is forced- mandated "training" requirements as preconditions for "qualifications" imposed upon the right to bear arms. Examples like this prove that the whole infringement is exactly that a pure abridging of a right meant TRULY to function as a barrier between people and our rights.
The fact is - this can happen to ANYONE no matter how "trained" they are. It depends upon one thing and one thing alone. Whether or not a individual abides by the three simple rules or whether they don't. As demonstrated - training doesn't produce one or the other. For only individual responsibility does so.
1 comment:
Along the lines of David's point, I submit that incidents like this demonstrate the facade that is forced- mandated "training" requirements as preconditions for "qualifications" imposed upon the right to bear arms. Examples like this prove that the whole infringement is exactly that a pure abridging of a right meant TRULY to function as a barrier between people and our rights.
The fact is - this can happen to ANYONE no matter how "trained" they are. It depends upon one thing and one thing alone. Whether or not a individual abides by the three simple rules or whether they don't. As demonstrated - training doesn't produce one or the other. For only individual responsibility does so.
Post a Comment